George Washington: Political Parties

George Washington’s views on political parties in America


Wednesday, December 31, 2014

SAN JOSE, March 9, 2012 – When George Washington became President of the United States in 1789, there were no political parties.

Political parties first emerged during Washington’s first term in office with the Alexander Hamilton’s Federalist Party in 1791 and in the following year, the formation of the Anti-Federalist Party or Democratic-Republicans under the leadership of Thomas Jefferson.

The two political parties formulated their views of how government ought to operate in the new republic.

At the end of Washington’s first term, as he was preparing to retire and go back to Mt. Vernon to just be a farmer again, the leaders of the opposing parties both wanted him to reconsider with Hamilton and Jefferson pleading with Washington to stay on for a second term.

Jefferson is credited as stating: “North and South will hang together if they have you to hang on.”

Washington finally consented to such sentiments and was again the obvious choice of the Electoral College as they re-elected him in February of 1793.

During Washington’s second term, the divisions between the two political parties became defined. A good part of the underlying differences between the two factions centered on the French Revolution (1789-1799). Continue reading

Slavery By Consent

SLAVERY BY CONSENT

Every American citizen needs to see this and understand what has happened to the people of this country.  The war was not fought to free the slaves …that was the lie told to the people to get support… it was about COMMERCE…it’s always about money…the 14th Amendment enslaved all CITIZENS… via the BIRTH CERTIFICATE and US CITIZENSHIP.

The Foreign International BANKERS are enemies of all people and until we open our eyes to see the truth we will never be free men and women and human trafficking will never stop!

People… People… People !!!

 PEOPLE… PEOPLE… PEOPLE!!

The election paragraph 5 the New President gave the control of the government back to the people!!!!

Now is the time for the electors and citizens to do research and learn their duty’s and make this happen.

This takes all state constitution’s back to what they had before President Lincoln!!!

You have to get involved  and take your country back right here at the local level and  work our way up.

This is a one 1 time deal you will never get the chance again!!

Freedom Isn’t Free.

Don’t worry about President Trump , he is not a politician he is a successful businessman. who will take this country out of debt and get it back to what it should be .

We all have to work on this together!!!

Spread far and wide.

Isaiah10

Paragraph five (5):  Today’s ceremony, however, has very special meaning because today, we are not merely transferring power from one administration to another or from one party to another, but we are transferring power from Washington, D.C. and giving it back to you, the people.   ~President Donald J. Trump  Inaugural Address 2017

Full Speech: Donald Trump Delivers Historic Speech in Gettysburg, PA 10/22/16

Full Speech: Donald Trump Delivers Historic Speech in Gettysburg, PA 10/22/16

Today, I unveiled my 100-day plan — a plan that will create jobs and a stronger economy, a plan with a solid strategy to finally defeat and end ISIS, a plan that paves the way for a greater America — an America that WINS again. Believe me, as President I will do more in 100 days than Hillary could in a lifetime — she’s had 30 years and done NOTHING. #ImWithYou! #DrainTheSwamp

Amerigeddon

AMERIGEDDON – FULL MOVIE

Amerigeddon is a 2016 American action film directed by Mike Norris and written by Gary Heavin. The movie describes a fictional attack on the United States by its own government, working in concert with a global terrorist organization

(MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX),
and the United Nations. Heavin has said that he regards the events in the film as a “very real threat”.
The movie was shot on Heavin’s Central Texas ranch and in nearby towns, and the majority of the film’s cast were recruited locally.
The movie was released on 13 May 2016.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mike_Norris_(actor)

David vs Goliath – Trump vs. Establishment

David vs Goliath – TRUMP vs. ESTABLISHMENT

Many of us know this biblical history lesson from yesteryear.
One of the lessons to be learned from this history lesson is how David was able to defeat Goliath, the Philistine giant that could not be conquered by all of Saul’s army.  The people were ‘terrorized’ by this Philistine Giant called, Goliath.

When David, a simple shepherd boy came forward to fight Goliath he was laughed at.  None of Saul’s trained men would go up against Goliath because those that did never returned.  David served Almighty God and feared Him alone.

Saul told them to give this boy his armor to wear so he at least had a chance.  The armor was brought to David and it was put on him but it was heavy, cumbersome, and was not natural to him.  He took it off and told them he could not fight with this armor.
Saul’s men thought certain death would befall David.
David went out to meet Goliath with his simple sling in hand …and praise to Almighty God upon his lips… He let the stone fly and it landed right between the eyes of Goliath and down the giant went…David ran to him and drew Goliath’s own sword and took off his head to assure  he was destroyed.  Victory from terrorism and songs of praise were sung to Almighty God for he delivered them!

Why do I tell you this story…because in this modern era Trump is David taking on Goliath, the System (Establishment).   Continue reading

Transcription-Donald Trump- Acceptance Speech

Full Transcription of Republican Nominee Donald J. Trumps Acceptance Speech

Friends, delegates and fellow Americans: I humbly and gratefully accept your nomination for the presidency of the United States.

Who would have believed that when we started this journey on June 16, last year, we — I say we because we are a team — would have received almost 14 million votes, the most in the history of the Republican party?

And that the Republican Party would get 60 percent more votes than it received eight years ago. Who would have believed it? The Democrats on the other hand, received 20 percent fewer votes than they got four years ago, not so good.

Together, we will lead our party back to the White House, and we will lead our country back to safety, prosperity, and peace. We will be a country of generosity and warmth. But we will also be a country of law and order.

Our convention occurs at a moment of crisis for our nation. The attacks on our police, and the terrorism in our cities, threaten our very way of life. Any politician who does not grasp this danger is not fit to lead our country.

Americans watching this address tonight have seen the recent images of violence in our streets and the chaos in our communities. Many have witnessed this violence personally. Some have even been its victims.

I have a message for all of you: The crime and violence that today afflicts our nation will soon — and I mean very soon come to an end. Beginning on January 20th 2017, safety will be restored. Continue reading

Constitutionally Guaranteed Right

Thursday, September 26, 2013 [original date]

Constitutionally Guaranteed Right Cannot Be Converted Into A Crime

Miller v. US (5th Circuit) 230 F. 2d. 486 (1956) “The claim and exercise of a constitutional right cannot thus be converted into a crime”
Miranda v. Arizona 384 US 436 (1966)
“Where rights are secured by the constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them.”
Hale v. Henkel 201 US 43 (1906)
“…There is a clear distinction…between an individual and a corporation…The individual may stand upon his constitutional rights as a citizen. He is entitled to carry on his private business in his own way…He owes nothing to the public so long as he does not trespass upon their rights. Upon the other hand, the corporation is a creature of the state…it’s powers are limited by law.”
Byars v. United States 273 US 28 (1927)
“…it is the duty of courts to be watchful for the constitutional rights of the citizen, and against any stealthy encroachment thereon.”
Marbury v. Madison (1 Cranch 170) 5 US 137 (1803)
“…a legislative act contrary to the constitution is not law…an act of the legislature repugnant to the constitution is void.”
Norton v. Shelby County 118 US 425 (1886)
“An unconstitutional act is not law…it imposes no duty…it is, in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed.”
Mugler v. Kansas 123 US 623 (1887)
“The supreme court of the United States is, however, the final expositor and arbiter of all disputed questions touching the scope and meaning of that sacred instrument [the US Constitution], and its decisions thereon are binding upon all courts, both state and federal.”
Ex Parte Young 209 US 123 (1908)
“The Eleventh Amendment provides no shield for a state official confronted by a claim that he had deprived another of a federal right under the color of state law…when a state officer acts under a state law in a manner violative of the federal constitution. And he is, in that case, stripped of his official or representative character, and is subjected in his person to the consequences of his individual conduct. The state has no power to impart to him any immunity from responsibility to the supreme authority of the United States.”
Staub v. Baxley 355 US 313 (1958)
“…an ordinance which makes the peaceful enjoyment of freedoms which the constitution guarantees contingent upon the uncontrolled will of an official – as by requiring a permit or license which may be granted or withheld in the discretion of such official – is an unconstitutional censorship or prior restraint upon the enjoyment of those freedoms.”
United States v. Jackson 390 US 570 (1968)
“If a law has ‘no other purpose…’ than to chill the assertion of constitutional rights by penalizing those who choose to exercise them, then it [is] patently unconstitutional.”
Cohens v. Virginia (6 Wheaton) 19 US 264 (1821)
“A law cannot exceed the authority of the lawgiver. We have no more right to decline the exercise of jurisdiction which is given, than to usurp that which is not given. The one or the other would be treason to the constitution. The several state legislatures and judiciaries, are all bound by solemn obligation of an oath, to support the federal constitution;…willfully legislating in violation of that constitution…[is] guilty of perjury. [309]”
Post borrowed from:  http://www.titanians.org/right-to-travel-is-guaranteed/