Do You Know That Being An Entrepreneur Can Help Restore Our Republic?

1835 Original Seal for Michigan

Do You Know That Being An Entrepreneur Can  Help Restore Our Republic?

How can becoming an entrepreneur restore our Republic?  Well, let’s think about this for a moment.  What is our greatest threat?  If you said global corporations you are correct.  Why are they a threat?   Well,.because they control supply and demand globally and pay those that make laws to impose regulations on the people that support their corporations and kill their competition, which is local community businesses.  They can set the laws that control every aspect of our lives, and they do. It is also self-preservation for them.

Being an employee keeps us slave to our employer.  It dictates when we go to work, how long we work, and how much we bring home.  This is not always a bad thing if you are employed by a small business in a local community,or a corporation with integrity, but if you’re working for a global corporation then you are subject to their bottom-line and that corporation dictates to you because you are just a number that can be replaced when there is a change in their bottom-line or a “regime change.”  Regime change means a change in the political ideology of the upper corporate management.

Do these corporations pay good, of course they do but what happens when they downsize?   They start laying off their higher paid employees to bring in new younger employees at a lower wage, but you are still slave to the debt accumulated from that higher wage, that doesn’t go away just because the job does.  This can be seen in all the foreclosured homes which are due to loss of jobs, and the unemployment rate climbs as global corporations continue to make changes with no regard to those they employ even though they are making billions of dollars and have more than anyone needs in one lifetime, but it is about power and control.

Daily more jobs are being lost as global political posturing is ramped up with the TPP.  This is the vulnerability of working for a global entity if you are not at the top of the pyramid globally you are expendable, not to mention that many of these global corporations are also importing their people for these jobs because they work at a reduced rate.

When the “New Deal” first came into being it was thought to be wonderful but what wasn’t taken into account is that we still had a huge base of small businesses across this country. It has squashed many of these businesses and now a couple of generations later most of the small businesses have been regulated out of business by design, especially the family farming industry.  They’ve repeatedly been attacked by the global agricultural corporations.

Continue reading

Treaties Do Not Supersede the Constitution – VERY IMPORTANT!

1835 Original Seal for Michigan

Treaties Do Not Supersede the Constitution

VERY IMPORTANT!

The following qualifies as one of the greatest lies the globalists continue to push upon the American people. That lie is: “Treaties supersede the U.S. Constitution”.

The Second follow-up lie is this one: “A treaty, once passed, cannot be set aside”.

HERE ARE THE CLEAR IRREFUTABLE FACTS: The U.S. Supreme Court has made it very clear that

1) Treaties do not override the U.S. Constitution.
2) Treaties cannot amend the Constitution. And last,

3) A treaty can be nullified by a statute passed by the U.S. Congress (or by a sovereign State or States if Congress refuses to do so), when the State deems a treaty the performance of a treaty is self-destructive. The law of self-preservation overrules the law of obligation in others. When you’ve read this thoroughly, hopefully, you will never again sit quietly by when someone — anyone — claims that treaties supercede the Constitution. Help to dispell this myth.

“This [Supreme] Court has regularly and uniformly recognized the supremacy of the Constitution over a treaty.” – Reid v. Covert, October 1956, 354 U.S. 1, at pg 17.

This case involved the question: Does the NATO Status of Forces Agreement (treaty) supersede the U.S. Constitution? Keep reading.

Continue reading

America was given a Constitutional REPUBLIC, not a Democracy! ~Aaron Russo

America was given a Constitutional REPUBLIC, not a Democracy!

“The American people are living in a matrix. They don’t understand the truth of how things happen in this country. If you ask 100 people on the street what kind of government is America suppose to be 99% of them will tell you a democracy, America is suppose to be a democracy, but that’s a lie. That’s an illusion. The word, democracy” is not written in the Constitution one time, its not in the Bill of Rights, or the Declaration of Independence. The founding fathers “hated” the idea of a democracy. They thought it was the worst kind of government there is, and I agree with them. In a democracy 51% of the people control 49% of the people. If your part of the 49%, you’re not free. America was founded as a Constitutional Republic, and in that Constitutional Republic we have 99% of the people can take away the rights of 1% of the people. You have your rights because you were BORN with them. You have God given Human Rights that nobody can take away from you, not the government, the majority, no matter who they are, I can’t take away your rights, and that’s what our founding fathers gave us. But the psychological operations they do to us they make us believe we’re a democracy and that majority rules, you see, and they want you to believe that. Then they tell you this poll says this many want this and this many want that and and this many want this, and it doesn’t have anything to do with anything, America is not a democracy but ask the most intelligent people what government America is suppose to be and they’ll tell you, they’ll say a democracy because that is what they’ve been brainwashed. They’ve been psy-opted into that. They believe we’re in Iraq, They believe we’re in Iraq to vote democracy. The word democracy, you hear George Bush saying democracy means freedom. No, democracy equals New World Order. Democracy equals slavery. The word democracy is not synonymous with freedom.” ~Aaron Russo

Who controls the polls and voting? Those that control the pols and voting also control the outcome… and the numbers they give are a LIE…. GRASSROOTS AMERICA does not approve and support the corruption, immorality, and degradation this country has fallen to… it is another illusion… created to control people by majority rule.  They can do this because the “majority” of Americans do not know or understand WHO WE ARE… first and foremost… and it is more than just being American!

Declaration of Grievances

1835 Original Seal for Michigan

The Most Dangerous Force on Earth is
 100 Million Armed Americans with Nothing Left to Lose!

 

 

DECLARATION OF GRIEVANCES
and UNCONSTITUTIONAL ACTIONS THAT SHALL RESULT IN ARMED RESPONSE
(An Ultimate Line in the Sand)

TO:
All Federal, State, and Local Elected
and Appointed Officials and Employees;
All Public and Private Media Outlets
From:
WE THE PEOPLE, the Free Citizens of these United States, of the Several Sovereign States, and of the Counties, Cities, and Towns in those states;
Subject:
Notice of Non-Compliance, Declarations and States of War, and
Citizen’s “Rules Engagement.”
BE ADVISED:
WE THE PEOPLE, the citizens of these United States of America, individually and collectively, hereby proclaim certain specified and unspecified usurpation’s, laws, regulations, policies, practices and actions of elected, and non-elected public servants and employees are unconstitutional, unlawful abuses and excesses of power, control, and manipulation, often to the detriment, safety and security of citizens, and without just cause or legitimate, lawful authority; and that such violations will no longer tolerated.
Henceforth, any and all violations of the Constitution of the United States of America as written, amended, and ratified by the several states, by any public servant, whether elected, appointed, or employed by federal, state, or local government shall be deemed to be unlawful acts and as such shall be prosecuted and tried in appropriate judicial jurisdictions.
To Wit:
Any and all violations of the Constitution of the United States of America through and by legislative action, collusion, coordination, cooperation, financing, monetary management or assistance, or other mutually beneficial legislation, actions, contracts, or agreements;
Any and all laws, mandates, legal requirements, codes, and penalties enforced against any public or private commercial entity or enterprise that causes or forces said entities or enterprises to violate in actuality or in effect the Constitution of the United States of America;
Any Executive Action or Order, either at the federal or state level, that forces any and all political appointees, staff, or employees to violate the Constitution of the United States of America or act in such a manner that the constitutionally protected, God-given, natural human rights of the citizens of the United States of America are violated or denied, or that puts the safety, security, and lives of said citizens in possible or imminent danger and jeopardy.
NOW BE IT KNOWN:
WE THE PEOPLE, the citizens of these United States of America, after countless and repeated offenses and violations of our rights, both individually and collectively, as guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States of America
HEREBY DECLARE:
We will no longer comply with any law, Executive Order, regulation, code, treaty, or other mandate that violates our constitutional rights, forces us to violate the constitutional rights of our fellow citizens, or puts our lives and well-bring in jeopardy or imminent danger, or violates and invades our privacy or property without a warrant issued by impartial judicial authority.
We will, when aforementioned violations and actions are attempted with, and by, the use of armed force or aggression, oppose and deny said force and aggression with armed response, as is our right and duty under the Constitution of the United States of America.
Any action or attempted action by any government entity to use any armed aggressor force or any armed military unit(s), whether foreign or domestic, to control or force compliance of American citizens, will be met with armed resistance. Any and all such actions WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ACT OF WAR AGAINST THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, AND A STATE OF WAR SHALL EXIST;
Any action or attempted action by any government entity to declare a general state of “Martial Law” without due process and lawful justification, or without a clear failure of state or local government to fulfill their function to protect the citizens, WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ACT OF WAR AGAINST THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AND A STATE OF WAR SHALL EXIST;
Any action or attempted action by any government entity, whether by legislation or Executive Order, to “Suspend the Constitution of the United States of America” SHALL BE CONSIDERED AN ACT OF WAR AGAINST THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AND A STATE OF WAR SHALL EXIST;
Any action or attempted action by any government entity, whether by legislation or Executive Order, to specifically disarm, deny, confiscate, or otherwise violate the right of citizens to keep and bear arms, as guaranteed by the Second Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, SHALL BE CONSIDERED AN ACT OF WAR AGAINST THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AND A STATE OF WAR SHALL EXIST;
Any action or attempted action by any government entity, whether by legislation or Executive Order, to arrest, detain, or hold beyond a lawful period, without warrant, due process, or probable cause and without access to or representation of legal counsel, for any reason, any citizen or group of citizens, in any jail, prison, work camp or facility, or detention center or camp, without the express permission or request of the citizens, SHALL B E CONSIDERED AN ACT OF WAR AGAINST THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AND A STATE OF WAR SHALL EXIST.
BE IT FURTHER KNOWN:
American Citizens’ Rules of Armed Engagement
If representatives of a government agency, or members of an armed force, come to you or otherwise engages in any activity that denies or deprives you of your constitutionally protected, God-given natural human rights, and does so with violence or the threat of violence, and further, does so without a warrant issued upon presentation of probable cause by lawful judicial authority, armed resistance and engagement is authorized.
When, due to an unprovoked assault upon your person that puts your life in immediate jeopardy or has the potential to inflict great and serious bodily harm, armed resistance and the use of deadly force is authorized.
When, due to an unprovoked assault upon other persons that puts their lives in immediate jeopardy or has the potential to inflict great and serious bodily harm, armed resistance and the use of deadly force is authorized.
_____________________________________________

Signed____________________________________
Date___________ Location­___________________

Note from the author
Please do not erroneously label the foregoing document as a threat; it is not. It is a “line in the sand” that, hopefully, will be understood by all for precisely what it is. The widest possible distribution of this document is authorized, including personal and mass emails, with specific emphasis to all government personnel and agencies at all levels and functions, citizens’ organizations, and the entire spectrum of media outlets and Internet sites including Face Book, Twitter, You Tube and other social media.
Douglas Lamb
Patriot Militia Call Sign FIREHAWK
Director, WRAM
=========================================
Welcome to the WRAM Action Center
Below is information every Militia Member and Patriot Soldier MUST know. Some entries are long, some are short, but ALL are important in the coming fight for our return to freedom!
===========================================
I recommend checking these sites daily!
http://www.shtfplan.com
http://www.thecommonsenseshow.com/
http://alt-market.com
http://economiccollapsenews.com
http://personalliberty.com/
http://wramsite.com/?xg_source=msg_mes_network

Continue reading

Stewart Rhodes Oath Keepers Ask Police To Do What Is Right

Published on Dec 15, 2014

Stewart Rhodes of Oath Keepers “Lighting the Lamp of Liberty” event in Washington D.C. 11/17/2014 warns of rogue individuals in government abusing their power. He also asks sheriffs and peace officers to stand against the tyranny and abuse of individuals rights. He talks about Bundy Ranch and how bloodshed was closer than most realized. He also warns that the possibility of civil war is real.

View more videos at: WWW.CSPOA.ORG

LEAVE TO APPEAL

1835 Original Seal for MichiganThis e-mail is only going out to a few folks who might actually read it and share the information about the property rights cause with friends. Our judicial system is constitutionally bankrupt but we must use the system to expose it to everyone who wants to reestablish liberty in America. To have a case heard by the MI Supreme Court you must ask their permission, this process is called LEAVE TO APPEAL!  This LEAVE is not the actual BRIEF that must be filled if you are GRANTED permission to go before the MI Supreme Court it is just to present why you think this case is important and why they should hear your case. There is only about a 5% chance the case they will agree to hear the case and that is ok because this is a step in the overall exposure process. Below is just the introduction to the leave to appeal. Attached is the actual leave that was filed with the court. The attached also have both the opinion of the circuit and appeals courts. I have highlighted a couple statements in the Appeals Court OPINION I think you will find very interesting.

“Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn’t pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same.” –Ronald Reagan

Greg

GROUNDS   (INTRODUCTION)   MCR 7.302 (B)
This Constitutional and statutory case against the State could affect hundreds of thousands of acres of private property and property owners within the exterior boundaries of Michigan. Plaintiff’s / Appellant’s sought declaratory relief to prevent defendant Department of Environment Quality (DEQ) from entering the property to inspect for wetlands and to require wetland permit with restriction if State so desired.
The state has properly admitted they do not have any Holds, Liens, Monetary, Proprietary or Contractual interests in the physical Property which the Plaintiffs / Appellants is the Assign and holds fee simple patent with no reservation, as evidenced by chain of title. However, the state and lower courts claims PA 451 of 1994, MCL 324.30301 gives jurisdiction over the person and police powers are granted to them by Art. IV § 52 of Michigan Constitution to enter, inspect, and require permits. The Court has also stated this kind of entry and requirement for a permit would not constitute a taking.
The term “property” embodies more than just physical, corporeal assets; it can include intangible entities, such as rights and interests.[1]   The patent 4829 Grants all rights, privileges, immunities, and appurtenances of whatsoever nature, to heirs and assigns forever.” In its precise legal sense, property is nothing more than a collection of rights;[2] indeed, “property,” in law, is not the material object itself, but is the right and interest or domination rightfully obtained over such object, with the unrestricted right to its use, enjoyment, and disposition.[3] The right to exclude others, as well as their property, is one of the most essential sticks in the bundle of rights that are commonly characterized as property. [4] Our case was brought to defend the right to exclude other from the property, to retain control of resources and defend the right not to have to enter into any permitting scheme (contract) with the state for rights already secured.
Art. I § 14 Jury trials “The right of trial by jury shall remain, but shall be waived in all civil cases unless demanded by one of the parties in the manner prescribed by law.  So far, this case has been bantered around on the states home court by trustees and actors of the state, and now needs to be addressed by a jury, the ones who authorize the state to exist, and the ones whose properties are at risk.
The Declaration of Independence clearly states:
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,…”

LEAVE TO APPEAL SUPREME COURT searchable PDF DOCUMENT
Continue reading

The Appeals Court Opinion Has Arrived

THE APPEALS COURT OPINION HAS ARRIVED

From: “Greg Groninger” <ggron@charter.net>
Date: February 5, 2015 at 11:15:16 AM EST
To: <ggron@charter.net>
Subject: The Appeals Court Opinion Has Arrived

So we can all be clear, the case we are talking about here is Groninger et al v. MI. Dept. of Environmental (DEQ).  The DEQ is just like the kid in the schoolyard who likes to start fights knowing Big Brother (Attorney General Bill Schuette and his office) will step in and protect Little Brother (DEQ). Bill Schuette’s office will tell you – by statute – it is his job to defend lawsuits against state agencies. What?? Attorney General Bill Schuette seems to not understand that his FIRST DUTY is to the Constitution of the United States (the supreme law of the land) and the Michigan Constitution. Constitutions are written to protect the rights of the minority from the majority.

To sum up the opinion, the court denied us a jury trial or any trial for that matter.   I would say the opinion also shows the State trustees to be constitutionally and morally bankrupt.

Attached to this e-mail is a copy of the opinion and I have highlighted only five points, of the many points, that could be commented on in this six-page opinion. To make this easy, start on page four. However, before you start reading, let me say this: Do not be confused or intimidated by all the case citation used in this opinion. Many of these citations can be summed-up by one citation used in a case where the fed’s sued the State, U.S. ON BEHALF OF SAGINAW TRIBE v. STATE OF MICHIGAN 106 F.3d 130 (1997). “The defendants (State) follow the familiar model of contemporary legal argument by taking out of context a snippet of language from a Supreme Court opinion and manipulating it to reach a chosen result. They seize on language from…”  Yes, the Attorney General’s office is good at doing this and the court seems to have bought right in.

Comments on points numbered in the opinion.  Please see opinion, then read comment below.

Point #1: When did the Constitution stop being the supreme law of the land? Article VI, § 1, Cl. 2 “This Constitution, … shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby,…”  The State feels “However, the clause is not absolute, but “must be accommodated to the inherent police power of the State to safeguard the vital interests of its people.”  Sounds like we are being told we live in a police state and the Constitution is not relevant. To see where they think they get their police power authority, see point #4

Point #2: It is clear the State does not understand – or wants to twist the meaning of – FEE SIMPLE.  Black’s Law Dictionary (2nd, Edition, pg. 487) Fee Simple- “Absolute is an estate, which is limited absolutely to a man and his heirs and assigns forever, without any limitation or condition.” Seems to me when the DEQ wants to come on to my property and determine IF I can or cannot build a driveway this would be a “limitation or condition”.

Consider Black’s Law Dictionary (2nd, Edition, pg. 955) what is property. – Property, “Rightful dominion over external objects; ownership; the unrestricted and exclusive right to a thing; the right to dispose of the substance of a thing in every legal way, to possess it, to use it, and to exclude everyone else from interfering with it.”

Black’s Law Dictionary (2nd, Edition pg. 694) “LAND, in the most general sense, comprehends any ground, soil, or earth whatsoever; as meadows, pastures, woods, moors, waters, marshes, furzes and heath. The word “land” includes not only the soil, but everything attached to it, whether attached by the course of’ nature, as, trees, herbage, and water, or by the hand of man as buildings and fences.”

Point #3 This statement by the courts is very telling as to how they feel about private property. “Additionally, plaintiffs Groninger have not shown any reduction in the value of their property because defendant may enter the land to inspect whether it is wetland nor have they shown that any failure to issue a permit would reduce the value of their property. Even if they did, “[a] reduction in the value of the regulated property is insufficient, standing alone, to establish a compensable regulatory taking.”  The State Trustees are saying to us, we can take it if we want it and the Constitution cannot stop us.

Point #4: The Attorney General Bill Schuette is claiming the Michigan Constitution Art. IV § 52 gives the state police power over private property.

Art. IV § 52 states the following: “The conservation and development of the natural resources of the state (society of men) are hereby declared to be of paramount public concern in the interest of the health, safety and general welfare of the people. The legislature shall provide for the protection of the air, water and other natural resources of the state from pollution, impairment and destruction.”  (added by gdg)  STATE, n. Black’s Law Dictionary (2nd, Edition pg. 1105) “A body politic, or society of men, …”OF, Webster’s Dictionary 1828:  “From or out of; proceeding from, as the cause, source, means, author or agent bestowing.”

Does this sound like the state trustees were given any police powers over your private property or just the property owned by all of us, the Michigan society of men?  Will they next say they have the police power to come and develop your land?

The State is a society of men, not a land mass. This means the boundary of Michigan is the defining line of who can be a member of the society of men we call the State of Michigan.

Point #5 “Plaintiffs make a number of other arguments, which fail principally because defendant is a state regulator empowered by a state statute.” Seems they did not have any comments about the IX Amendment “The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.” It is very apparent; if it is not clearly called out in the Constitution, it belongs to the people undiminished.

Folks, it is up to us, the society of men, to stop this unconstitutional taking of your private property. All these folks (Attorney General, Judges, Governor, State Legislators…) who work for us, took an Oath before we allowed them to work for us.  We must hold them to their Oath’s; it is our duty to our children and grandchildren. What you are seeing is one of the most powerful tools the state uses to move the agenda of Agenda 21 forward in our great State.

What can you do?  Call, write or do both the Michigan Attorney General and let him know how you feel. His contact information is below. If you do not know, what Agenda 21 is then please looking into it.

Samuel Adams, who famously uttered,
“It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires in the minds of men.”

Greg Groninger

CONTACT INFORMATION FOR ATTORNEY GENERAL
Bill Schuette
Michigan Attorney General
525 W. Ottawa St.
P.O. Box 30212
Lansing, MI 48909
(517) 373-1110
e-mail  SchuetteB@michigan.gov

Restore Constitutional Carry

Below is a post for the “Restore Constitutional Carry” petition.  You can sign the petition but it would be a much better action to contact your local representative personally.  I’ve not known of any petitions that were given much attention, most are usually ignored, however, if a representatives constituents were to contact them directly that isn’t so easily ignored.  They need to know first person what you want them to do concerning this and if you’re proactive then they have to listen and will if they know your paying attention and going to hold them accountable.  Having said that, below is the link to take you to the page to sign the petition if you so desire.

Dear Fellow Patriot,

Fingerprint databases. Statist licensing schemes. Hefty fees.

The never-ending bureaucratic application and reapplication process. Plastic-coated permission slips.

Sometimes it seems the roadblocks and regulations anti-gun activists and their political allies have thrown up to discourage law-abiding Michiganders from carrying a concealed firearm are endless.

Well, guess what? They meant it that way.

The gun-grabbers know good and well that criminals don’t ask for permission to legally carry a firearm!

Their overbearing and unconstitutional “regulations” and “requirements” are meant to do nothing more than undermine the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding citizens just like you.

I don’t know about you, but I think it’s time Michigan Second Amendment supporters said, “Enough is enough!”

Please take a moment to sign this petition to your state lawmakers right away.

For Freedom,

Dudley Brown, Executive Director, National Association for Gun Rights

Dudley Brown

President

National Association for Gun Rights

Formatting Issues

I apologize for the delay in getting these new pages updated.  I’m working on a couple of different devices and trying to transfer information from the original website is creating problems because I’m  trying to copy and paste to avoid all the extra typing.  There is conflict in the formatting.  I hope to have it all worked out by tomorrow.  Thank you for your patience and check back for updates.

Michigan Free De Jure State Website