Looking to revamp the state constitution… NO…NO…and NO!!!

1835 Original Seal for MichiganDo we trust the government to do this?  There is so much corruption that you can be sure if the Constitution was amended it would reflect the edicts of the District of Criminals rather than the people!  Laws are to be bound by the Constitution and Bill of Rights, we do not change our Constitution to reflect the laws made for the government which is controlled by the “ruling” elite.  If we were to change our Constitution this is the one that it should be changed to 1835 MICHIGAN CONSTITUTION Amended and Ratified  by some of the people with no politician involvement.  VISIT THIS SISTER-SITE

“We the People are the rightful master of both congress and the courts – not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution.”            ~Abraham   Lincoln

 

Looking to revamp the state constitution  original source

LANSING (AP) — A group that researches public policy in Michigan says it’s time to erase parts of the state constitution that are no longer enforced.

The U.S. Supreme Court recently legalized same-sex marriage. The decision killed an amendment to the Michigan Constitution that recognized marriage as between a man and a woman.

The Citizens Research Council of Michigan says there are many parts of the constitution that have been overturned and have no legal standing. But they remain in the document because only voters can remove them.  [How can this be..overturned…no legal standing… says who?]
 
They include a voting age of 21, term limits for members of Congress and restrictions on who can vote on property taxes. [Maybe we need to revisit these parts and bring them back and NULLIFY what was put in place to overturn them??]

Eric Lupher of the Research Council says the constitution should “reflect reality.” The Legislature can ask voters to make changes in the document. [Yes, but the reality should reflect our Constitution, not change our Constitution to reflect un-constitutional laws]

(Copyright ©2015 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.)

LEAVE TO APPEAL

1835 Original Seal for MichiganThis e-mail is only going out to a few folks who might actually read it and share the information about the property rights cause with friends. Our judicial system is constitutionally bankrupt but we must use the system to expose it to everyone who wants to reestablish liberty in America. To have a case heard by the MI Supreme Court you must ask their permission, this process is called LEAVE TO APPEAL!  This LEAVE is not the actual BRIEF that must be filled if you are GRANTED permission to go before the MI Supreme Court it is just to present why you think this case is important and why they should hear your case. There is only about a 5% chance the case they will agree to hear the case and that is ok because this is a step in the overall exposure process. Below is just the introduction to the leave to appeal. Attached is the actual leave that was filed with the court. The attached also have both the opinion of the circuit and appeals courts. I have highlighted a couple statements in the Appeals Court OPINION I think you will find very interesting.

“Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn’t pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same.” –Ronald Reagan

Greg

GROUNDS   (INTRODUCTION)   MCR 7.302 (B)
This Constitutional and statutory case against the State could affect hundreds of thousands of acres of private property and property owners within the exterior boundaries of Michigan. Plaintiff’s / Appellant’s sought declaratory relief to prevent defendant Department of Environment Quality (DEQ) from entering the property to inspect for wetlands and to require wetland permit with restriction if State so desired.
The state has properly admitted they do not have any Holds, Liens, Monetary, Proprietary or Contractual interests in the physical Property which the Plaintiffs / Appellants is the Assign and holds fee simple patent with no reservation, as evidenced by chain of title. However, the state and lower courts claims PA 451 of 1994, MCL 324.30301 gives jurisdiction over the person and police powers are granted to them by Art. IV § 52 of Michigan Constitution to enter, inspect, and require permits. The Court has also stated this kind of entry and requirement for a permit would not constitute a taking.
The term “property” embodies more than just physical, corporeal assets; it can include intangible entities, such as rights and interests.[1]   The patent 4829 Grants all rights, privileges, immunities, and appurtenances of whatsoever nature, to heirs and assigns forever.” In its precise legal sense, property is nothing more than a collection of rights;[2] indeed, “property,” in law, is not the material object itself, but is the right and interest or domination rightfully obtained over such object, with the unrestricted right to its use, enjoyment, and disposition.[3] The right to exclude others, as well as their property, is one of the most essential sticks in the bundle of rights that are commonly characterized as property. [4] Our case was brought to defend the right to exclude other from the property, to retain control of resources and defend the right not to have to enter into any permitting scheme (contract) with the state for rights already secured.
Art. I § 14 Jury trials “The right of trial by jury shall remain, but shall be waived in all civil cases unless demanded by one of the parties in the manner prescribed by law.  So far, this case has been bantered around on the states home court by trustees and actors of the state, and now needs to be addressed by a jury, the ones who authorize the state to exist, and the ones whose properties are at risk.
The Declaration of Independence clearly states:
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,…”

LEAVE TO APPEAL SUPREME COURT searchable PDF DOCUMENT
Continue reading