March 02, 2013  HLS CONSTITUTION FREE ZONE - Inquiry sent to Rep Mike Shirkey, Rep Matt Lori, and Sen. John Proos

----- Original Message -----
From: C Forster
To: "State Rep Mike Shirkey" <>; "Rep. Matt Lori (District 59)" <>; "John Proos"
Sent: Saturday, March 02, 2013 1:30 PM
Subject: HLS Constitution free zone

    REP Mike Shirkey,Rep Matt Lori and Senator John Proos  What is your view on the HLS constitutional free zone? Are they stepping on states rights?
    Do you think HLS has the right or any authority to strip Michigan of the constitution? Acts like this are what make both of our issues very important.
    Thank You For Your Time.
    Charlie Forster
    Jones Michigan

----- Original Message -----
From: C Forster
To: Rep. Mike Shirkey (District 65)
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2013 7:45 PM

    Hello this is the very reason you must include all legal arms! Most all of the common name  gun makers are owned by one of George Soros's fence
    company's and are or will be made in china.  If you could  get the property tax rate down to what it was in the 1930's and get rid of the Michigan
    income tax  someone might think about coming in. When I was a young man working we had no state income tax! The income tax was put on to pay
    for the bridge and the politicons of the day said when the bridge was payed for the tax would come off or be repealed!!  What is the hold up?
    Maybe we should look up and see when the bridge was paid off and start charging you folks interest on the  monies extorted since. Charlie

    On 03/01/2013 01:48 PM, Rep. Mike Shirkey (District 65) wrote:
    We do not have details on gun manufacturers in MI.  We have no major makers, but are hoping to attract larger manufacturers from other states
    that have excessive gun control laws.  Smaller mom and pop manufacturers that are here may also expand with a better environment; you never
    know where the next Glock may spring from.  The main sponsor of that bill may have additional information if you contact their office.
    In answer to your other question, here is a link to when Mack will be in Michigan:
    Have a safe weekend
The Best Guns And  Freedom Video Around (0nly 7.5 minutes)
In short order, this video slices through the spin and clearly exposes the truth about gun control. So tastefully done it will open the eyes of many a fence
sitter who's started noticing the bad smell coming from DC.  
VIDEO  [link below]
Grace and Peace,
~submitted by Robert L

March 01, 2013  SOME OF YOU STILL DON'T GET IT - by Neil
Just fair warning, this one is a tad bit long, even for me.
My last article garnered a comment from someone I know that proves that I was right when I said that most people couldn’t name even five of the rights
protected by the Bill of Rights. This person, who I won’t mention, but who knows who they are, said that I was nuts because we can still exercise all our
rights. So I asked them to name five of the rights, just as the article said. The first thing they said was freedom of speech, followed by a long pause. So I
prodded, what else? Then they blurted out I plead the fifth. To which I replied, you ought to before you make a bigger fool of yourself than you already
have. Of course that didn’t go over too well, but it proved my point that most people CAN’T name the rights which our Founders felt were so important that
they listed them individually in the Bill of Rights

----- Original Message -----
To: Bonnie
Sent: Friday, March 01, 2013 10:55 AM
Subject: Internet Keeping Kids from Grandparents

    I just read online the headline of how the Internet is keeping kids from it goes besides gaming that is destroying families but it said
    that because kids can find out whatever they need to know from internet they don't need to go to grandma any longer for any wisdom. Sad...

[My thought:  I decided to post this because it speaks volumes to  what has happened across our country. A sense of family, values, virtue, principles and
our American Heritage is no longer being passed along from generation to generation.  Our children are no longer being taught the true history of our
founding but instead are being programmed by the propaganda machine referred to as state (public) schools. So, if our heritage from our parents and
grandparents is being replaced with the Internet, we've truly lost our nation folks. We are just as complicit for failing to protect our children from those that
will use them for profit and power<><]


    ----- Original Message -----
    From: C. Forster
    To: "Senator Debbie Stabenow" <>
    Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 4:47 PM
    Subject: Russia Bans imports of us beef,poultry

    From Charlie Forster [mailing address removed for privacy]  Jones Michigan 49061

    DEFACTO Senator Stabenow,  
    I seen the article in my local farm paper about Russia Banning beef and poultry imports due to Ractopamine additive. The Russians are well within
    their rights to ban not only due to the Ractopamine but also all the GMO grains these animals have digested in their lives. They should also be
    banned in The United States. You may disagree due to your political ties but when  you put this feed out and the mice and rats don't eat it, you know
    something is wrong, And what about all the chemicals they are incorporating in the seeds? This just has to be poisoning our and other people. Oh
    well just go down and enjoy a RoundUp ready steak for supper and rinse it down with some RoundUp ready Soy Milk.  Charlie

RERE GUN LAWS -  Summary from American Rifleman, March 2000, page 20
----- Original Message -----
From: isaiah
To: Bonnie
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 4:54 PM
Subject: Re: rere gun laws

Summary from American Rifleman, March 2000, page 20

    "Haynes, a convicted felon, was convicted of unlawful possession of an unregistered short-barreled shotgun.   He argued that for a convicted felon
    to register a gun was effectively an announcement to the government that he was breaking the law and that registration violated his Fifth
    Amendment protection against self-incrimination.   The court, by an 8 – 1 margin, agreed, concluding: “We hold that a proper claim of the
    constitutional privilege against self-incrimination provides a full defense to prosecutions either for failure to register a firearm…or for possession of
    an unregistered firearm.” (Summary from American Rifleman, March 2000, page 20)  So, when these gun registration schemes are announced, be
    aware that only lawful gun-owners are required to register their firearms.  Unlawful owners are exempted from registration laws due to their
    constitutional protection against self-incrimination."

I think this goes back to when they started the barrel and stock length rules.shot gun 18 and 8 rifle 16 and 8. This was done to discourage the gangsters
short 12 ga pistol etc. BTW one that is cut at the pistol grip and for end will have a bad muzzle jump while one that is just legal length will do a fine job  and
handle fast enough.
~submitted by Gray Beard

From: Melissa
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2013 4:54 PM
To: Bonnie
Subject: Re: FW: info

I have received a response from one of the reps and I have written him back.
Phil Cavanagh,

"there are a number of bills that deal with various aspects of firearm regulation including weapon free zones".  Do you realize that there is a law called the
Dick Act of 1903, which states that there is no law that shall take away the second amendment.  Are all of you, as representatives confused about who put
you in office and why?  There should be absolutely NO LAWS that impede or take away the second amendment, and that includes assault rifles. Where is
your authority?  The people did not give you that power. "While I support the 2nd amendment and all rights guaranteed by the Constitution, I believe that
weapons capable of such mass destruction can be regulated without impinging upon our Constitutional rights."  In this statement I hear a lot of  "I support,
and I believe. There are a lot of I's in your answer, sir.  Again, your opinion is not the reason that you are in the position that you are in and why "WE THE
PEOPLE" are paying your huge salary as many are out of work and can barely feed their children.  OUR OPINION IS THE ONLY OPINION THAT SHOULD
SHINE THROUGH WHEN A BILL OR A DISCUSSION COMES UP IN THE STATE CONGRESS!!  Again, you are confused as to the duty of your stay in office
which is only because others put you there.  We continue to get these type of letters back from representatives that state thank you for your opinion and I
will try to keep it in mind when "I" make a decision.  Please keep this in mind that "WE THE PEOPLE" have sat back and allowed unchecked power to grow
like a cancer but now we are growing in numbers and there will be a major house cleaning of representatives that have THEIR OWN OPINION and
AGENDA'S, which are controlled by lobbyists.  No more!  

Also, where is my letter or statement from you about the DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and a so called, "CONSTITUTION FREE ZONE" in the
state of Michigan.  "WE THE PEOPLE" did not vote on this POWER GRAB and most people do not even understand or know that it exists.  This information
has gone viral and it will catch on.  I am expecting an explanation as to why this has come to fruition and what you sir, Phil Cavanagh have done to stop
DHS whom has no authority whatsoever, via the tenth amendment.  If this is allowed to happen what will you be doing for an occupation and to feed your
children?  I will be looking forward to your detailed explanation to these questions.  I have posted all letters, including mine from Representatives on the
internet for "WE THE PEOPLE" to view.   

Concerned Citizen of the state of Michigan and "WE THE PEOPLE"  -ALL RIGHTS RESERVED AND WITHOUT PREJUDICE  PURSUANT TO  UCC 1-308
This plan is THE fastest, cheapest and easiest way to start a food storage program.  You are done in a weekend. AND there are no hassles with rotating.  
Pack it and forget.  It’s space efficient – everything is consolidated into a few 5-gallon buckets.  You’ll sleep content in knowing that you have a one-year
food supply on hand for your family should you ever need.
~submitted by Gray Beard

[My thought: This could be used for low income families on a fixed income to stretch their ability to feed their family, especially if cuts to food stamps take
place. As a Naturopathy doctor I live by this rule, " I eat to survive, I don't survive to eat".<><]

February 26, 2013  2ND Amendment Preservation Act Email Conversation between Mr. Forster and Rep. Mike Shirkey, District 65  PDF
As with most email dialogues that are forwarded, one must scroll down, then scroll back up while reading for the correct order of the conversation.
I filled out a web form for Congressman Benishek and Representative Kivela for District 1 on both issues. I only received a thank you from Rep.Kivela but
here is the read back from Congressman Benishek    
2nd Amendment    Constitution Free Notice
All the names and email addresses are listed in the Doc above.  Just copy and paste your District Representative.  A big "thank you" to Cathy for the time
spent gathering all the names and addresses.
Ron Paul: “When They Came For The Raw Milk Drinkers…”
February 25, 2013 The Doc Swat Team Milk Raid—While I oppose most gun control proposals, there is one group of Americans I do believe should be
disarmed: ——Federal Agents. The use of force by federal agents to enforce unjust and unconstitutional laws is one of the major, albeit overlooked,
threats to liberty. Too often Americans are victimized by government force simply for engaging in commercial transactions disproved of by Congress and
the federal bureaucracy.
For example, the offices of Rawesome Foods in Venice, California, have been repeatedly raided by armed federal and state agents, and Rawesome’s
founder, 65-year old James Stewart, has been imprisoned. What heinous crime justified this action? Rawesome sold unpasteurized (raw) milk and cheese
to willing customers – in a state where raw milk is legal!  You cannot even drink milk from a cow without a federal permit!
From what I've read they took the farms inventory of thousands of dollars and the farm is now filing for bankruptcy– Where else can a thing like this
happen– besides a
free country like America —-
~submitted by Edge—

[My thought: This is the tyranny that is going on daily across our country and the people cower away and allow innocent hard-working people to lose all
they have because they are competition for the mega corporations. These are the real criminals and I agree with Ron Paul, if anyone should be disarmed
it is these Federal Agencies that are terrorizing innocent Americans that are just trying to survive. We all need to revisit our Declaration of Independence I
think <><]

February 25, 2013      RUGER HAS MADE IT SIMPLE
-----Original Message-----
From: isaiah
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2013 10:17 AM
Subject: Re: Ruger has made it simple

    NOT PUT YOU ON A GUN OWNERS LIST!!!! You do it yourself!! We email and snail mailed both the Notice and the Preservation act. When
    you do it your self it has more meaning than those mass mailings and  they don't even look at them!
    We hope every one will take the time to snail mail three envelopes for each issue and also email. Time is short!!
    I think Ruger is one of those company's bought out by George Soros under one of his Illuminati fence names AND ONE CAN ONLY WONDER
    On 02/25/2013 01:18 AM, XXXXX wrote:
    >   Ruger has made it simple!
    > Go to the link and follow the simple prompts.
    > Ruger has made it easy for you to contact your Local and National Representatives. It only takes about 2 minutes and sends a pro-2nd
    Amendment email to everyone from the president down to your local state reps.
    `submitted by Gray Beard
[My note:  Please everyone, print or copy and paste the Notice and the 2nd Amendment Preservation Act and send them to your District Representatives,
Senators, and Governor, but at least your Representatives, and send them separately so as not to confuse the two very serious issues. Beware of BIG
CORPORATIONS, and it is best to independently as THE PEOPLE to give Congress a DIRECTIVE first hand, not through one of THEIR SUBSIDIARY
CORPORATIONS.  Our Constitutional Rights do not come from CORPORATE POLICIES. If we play their game it is feeding the corporate beast, as THE
PEOPLE, lets stop doing this and let our unalienable rights be the foundation we stand on and demand they honor their oaths or step down from their
"governance" of the people..  This is how we restore our de jure republic. Link for defacto state citizen guide above for your convenience. <><]

"Smart Meters" & EMR: The Health Crisis Of Our Time - Dr. Dietrich Klinghardt  VIDEO   
I sent this to our city manager, Senator Vincent Gregory and Vicki Barnett.  I will, time willing, send to all the representatives. ~submitted by Cathy C

[My note: If you are pregnant, planning to have children, know someone that is, or already have children it would behoove you to watch the above video
for the sake of your child's health as well as your own. Please become proactive in managing your own health and that of your children. Follow Cathy's
lead and do the same, send this information to your representatives.  They need to hear from the people that we are NOT going to quietly go along with
this destruction created by big corporations for profit <><]
National Standards Enforcement Agency/Authority -(NSEA) WISHES TO ALIGN WITH International Common Law Court of Justice -(ITCCS)

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Tom Murphy
Date: Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:24 AM
Subject: NSEA wishes to aline with ITCCS
Notice to Clerk of District Court 2-8013- Full Notice   Clean Water Contingency Program 2012     Sewer Rats  

Dear Secretariat,

Please convey to Kevin Annett our wish for the National Standards Enforcement Agency/Authority’s (“NSEA”) to align with ITCCS so as to convene our
common law courts in alignment with and under the same name of International Common Law Court of Justice.  We at NSEA have developed a notice and
contract document (attached) to serve to all the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTs in America.  Currently, grand jury quorums of a pool of twenty-three
(23) are being formed in every State by our people in every State.  A tribunal of three justices will be selected from the pool [of non-U.S. citizens] to hear
any case regarding crimes against humanity and genocide.

We will be bringing actions against public servants (employees of private corporations impersonating public servants) who are complicit with the crimes of
genocide being perpetrated upon the American people by knowingly contributing to the poisoning of the people’s drinking water resources in violation of
the Public Law 92-500 Clean Water Act.  The UNITED STATES “UNLAWFUL” WASTEWATER INDUSTRY, owned by the Vatican and dba the UNITED
STATES GOVERNMENT and STATE governments, has been operating in violation of the Clean Water Act now for over 40 years.  It is the one crime they
are all guilty of….and it is a “strict liability” statute that attached criminal penalties.  We have already completed an investigative report on Janet
Napolitano, who was found to have a slush fund in the Vatican Bank as the result of your efforts, for extorting of the people of Lake Havasu City of $1.8
Billion dollars when she was Attorney General and Governor of Arizona.  She is going to be one of the first…along with Obama and company.  I also wish
to confirm if the USEPA Administrator Lisa Jackson had a slush fund in the Vatican Bank.

The so-called UNITED STATES [INC.] government impersonators are actually doing business as a Vatican owned, co-corporation of the London municipal
wastewater management utility since 1871, also known as the UNITED STATES WASTEWATER INDUSTRY that has been unlawfully operating since July
1, 1973.  Over 35,000 people each month (just in America, NOT including Canada) are dying from just cancer due to toxic/acidic drinking water conditions
as a result of this grave omission/refusal of these Vatican Criminal Genocidests to administer federal health code, the at-source containment and control
required by the congressionally mandated regulations of the Clean Water Act, and that is JUST the beginning.

Since 40% of all municipal revenue nationally was the result to wastewater management revenues, Nixon, a member of the bar…who is in fact the ones put
in power to protect the Vatican/Crown/City of London/IMF investments, specifically the largest industry in the world, the $500 Billion dollar a year UNITED
STATES WASTEWATER INDUSTRY, put the BAR in charge of all “courts,” in actuality… mere “administrative agencies” having ZERO judicial authority.  
The people NEVER gave judicial powers to “private corporations.”  The U.S. courts, from the UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, UNITED STATES
DISTRICT COURTS, the STATE SUPERIOR COURTS and MUNICIPAL COURTS are the “gate keepers” charged to “get rid of” any action that would
threaten their criminal UNITED STATES WASTEWATER INDUSTRY racketeering influenced corrupt organization (“R.I.C.O.”) run enterprise.

The BAR is charged with protecting and maintaining the unlawful wastewater management practice of poisoning the people feeding their other primary
criminal enterprises, i.e. insurance, health care and pharmaceutical, all to create unjust enrichments and ill-gotten gains.   If they had complied with the
Clean Water Act of 1972 [spurred by JFK], they would have been out of business by 1985, the year all public sewers were to be outlawed as the primary
national goal of the United States Congress as defined in the Clean Water Act.

Further, as a member of the “wastewater industry” since 1972, I am a federal witnesses to their unlawful practice of knowingly unlawfully discharging 65
plus known toxic pollutants/hazardous substances associated with domestic sewage, listed on the USEPA Toxic Pollutant List, uncontained and
uncontrolled (as mandated by the Clean Water Act), at every onshore facility in north America, including Canada, such to be operating in compliance with
the requirements of the congressionally mandated standards of performance and pretreatment requirements of the Clean Water Act.  However, only
approximately 20 onshore facilities are containing and controlling these poisons.  This mission of genocide, premeditated murder upon the people of
America and Canada, is controlled by the Vatican “sewer rats.”  They have knowingly, with intent to harm, converted every home, i.e. or building having a
toilet, into a “chemical and biological weapon of mass destruction,” unlawfully discharging poisons by exfiltration and direct discharge into our nations
drinking water resources.  Now, you have exposed them to be what we have been claiming.

We have already conveyed to the public in several documentations over the past two years (see attached) the enemy is the Vatican, International
Monetary Fund, City of London, the Crown, and the Guild of London from which comes all members of the BAR who are controlling America right now,
killing, stealing and destroying “us.”

What you have recently done is awesome!  Thank you!

We at NSEA.US wish to support and expand the mission of ITCCS into the true united states for America.  In order to do that, we wish to provide the name
of our court in Section 3.4 of the “notice-contract” (attached) which will be sent to the district courts, to be defined as: The International Court of Record of
Justice.  NSEA has already executed a joint powers agreement with the 11th tribe of the Cherokee Republic and have been adopted as an Elder advisor to
the tribe.

Accordingly, “International” is also the proper identification of venue for our court of record.  We wish to align with you and your program and assist in your
pursuit of justice.  We could implement the “North America Reclamator Program.”  The program would restore government, clean water, good health and
economic stability throughout North America.  Additionally, our “New Water Source Utility” has been approved to receive “debt forgiven funds” of up to
$180 Billion available to implement technology that transforms raw sewage into pure potable healthy water and generates enough electricity to sustain a
home.  However, we must first get these government imposters out of our way.  This is why the people must be able to convene their common law courts.

We would also hope that the alignment of NSEA and ITCCS could also bring a certain level of benefit to your efforts.  For us, we see the relationship to be
very beneficial to both parties and in the interest of mankind at large.  For this reason, we wish to have your blessings on our using the name of the court,
International Common Law Court of Record.

Please contact me pursuant to the information below to discuss further.

Keep up the good work and may God bless you,

Tom Murphy
Private Attorney-General
National Standards Enforcement Authority
“an in capita sovereign body authority of the people”
~submitted by Cathy C

From: isaiah
Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2013 9:59 AM
To: Bonnie Frownfelter
Cc: Governor Rick Snyder; Senator John Proos; State Rep Adam Zemke; State Rep Al Pscholka; State Rep Alberta Tinsley - Talabi; State Rep Amanda
Price; State Rep Andrea LaFontaine; State Rep Andrew Kandrevas; State Rep Andy Schor; State Rep Anthony Forlini; State Rep Aric Nesbitt; State Rep
Ben Glardon; State Rep Bill Lavoy; State Rep Bill Rogers; State Rep Bob Genetski; State Rep Brad Jacobsen; State Rep Brandon Dillon; State Rep Brian
Banks; State Rep Bruce Rendon; State Rep Charles Brunner; State Rep Charles Smiley; State Rep Cindy Denby; State Rep Collene Lamonte; State Rep
Dale Zorn; State Rep Dan Lauwers; State Rep Dave Pagel; State Rep David Knezek; State Rep David Nathan; State Rep David Rutledge; State Rep Dian
Slavens; State Rep Douglas Geiss; State Rep Earl Poleski; State Rep Ed McBroom; State Rep Eileen Kowall; State Rep Ellen Lipton; State Rep Frank
Foster; State Rep Fred Durhal; State Rep Gail Haines; State Rep George Darany; State Rep Greg MacMaster; State Rep Gretchen Driskell; State Rep
Harold Haugh; State Rep Harvey Santana; State Rep Henry Yanez; State Rep Hugh Crawford; State Rep Jase Bolger; State Rep Jeff Farrington; State
Rep Jeff Irwin; State Rep Jim Ananich; State Rep Jim Stamas; State Rep Jim Townsend; State Rep Joel Johnson; State Rep John Kivela; State Rep John
Olumba; State Rep John Walsh; State Rep Jon Bumstead; State Rep Jon Switalski; State Rep Joseph Graves; State Rep Joseph Haveman; State Rep Kate
Segal; State Rep Ken Goike; State Rep Ken Yonker; State Rep Kenneth Kurtz; State Rep Kevin; State Rep Kevin Daley; State Rep Klint Kesto; State Rep
Kurt Heise; State Rep Lisa Lyons; State Rep Marcia Hover Wright; State Rep Margaret O'Brien; State Rep Marilyn Lane; State Rep Martin Howrylak; State
Rep Matt Lori; State Rep Mike Callton; State Rep Mike McCready; State Rep Mike Shirkey; State Rep Nancy Jenkins

Dear Michigan elected official,
adopt the below document as soon as possible
Thank you
Charlie Forster
Jones MI

    STATE 2ND AMENDMENT PRESERVATION ACT, which shall be known and may be cited as the “2nd Amendment Preservation ACT.” To
    prevent federal infringement on the right to keep and bear arms; nullifying all federal acts in violation of the 2nd Amendment to the
    Constitution of the United States. WE The People of Michigan ENACT AS FOLLOWS:

    SECTION 1: We The People OF Michigan find that:
    A. The 2nd Amendment to the Constitution of the United States reads as follows, “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a
    free state, the
    right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”
    B. All federal acts, laws, orders, rules or regulations regarding firearms are a violation of the 2nd Amendment

    A. We The People OF Michigan declares that all federal acts, laws, orders, rules, regulations – past, present or future – in violation of the 2nd
    Amendment to the Constitution of the United States are not authorized by the Constitution of the United States and violate its true meaning
    and intent as given by the Founders and Ratifiers; and are hereby declared to be invalid in this State,and shall not be recognized by any
    county, are specifically rejected by that county, and shall be
    considered null and void and of no effect in this county.

    B. It shall be the duty of the Sheriff of each County to take all measures as may be necessary to prevent the enforcement of any federal acts,
    laws, orders, rules, or regulations in violation of the 2nd Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.

    SECTION 3 This Second Amendment Right to bear arms applies to ALL arms and ammunition for said arms. The citizenry per the second
    amendment is given the right to bear all weapons made available to the military, and ammunition to said weapons is to be readily available,
    this cannot be infringed upon. ''If the Government is allowed to have it the people (the employers) may have it."
    Current Michigan Constitution
    § 6 Bearing of arms. Sec. 6. Every person has a right to keep and bear arms for the defense of himself and the state.

    § 4 Militia.
    Sec. 4. The militia shall be organized, equipped and disciplined as provided by law. History: Const. 1963, Art. III, § 4, Eff. Jan. 1, 1964.Former
    constitution: See Const. 1908, Art. XV, §§ 1-3.

      Charlie Forster       &          Bonnie Frownfelter
      Jones Mi 49061                  Munising, MI 49862

[My note: Please copy and paste the above ACT and present it to your townships and counties councils/commissioners to create an Ordinance to adopt
this Act for the protection of the peoples rights, then give notice to the county sheriff so he is informed and can enforce the ordinance. This is being sent
to all the above by USPS.<><]


----- Original Message -----
From: Donald F
To: undisclosed recipients:
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 9:41 AM
Subject: Seat belt ticket

Well it happened. The ticket that I said if I ever got, I would be really angry. This is the most Un-Constitutional nonsense ever!
Imagine a cop having nothing better to do than peak through your vehicle windows and see if you have your seat belt on! Tell me WE are not just a
resource to milk for money?! This fits under the "unreasonable search and seizure" category doesn't it? A cop can say, "It didn't look like you had your
seat belt on, so what else is going on today?" That's bull crap!!! We are not free, why do we keep deluding ourselves?
So, I'm driving through the little town of Mancelona like I do 3 times a week for the last 10 years. Barney Fife is sitting at a gas station facing the highway,
waves to a "buddy" heading north, turns to look my way as I was passing at just the perfect time, I was heading south, and whips out behind me. You know
that feeling you get when you know for sure it's you they are coming for. Another guy was right on my tail with a full size pick-up so the LEO couldn't see
me right away from the time he pulled out, so I had pulled my belt on knowing that was the only reason he could pull me over. I thought, "there ya go ya pot
licker, got it on now". He lights em up, I pull over and he says, "I'm enforcing the seat belt law today and you have to have it on before I see you didn't,
license and registration" or something like that. I told him "I have a CPL", he says "OK". I give him "my papers" he heads back to "generate some revenue"
with his pen.
When he comes back to my window I thought I'd share my feelings with him, I said, "When you became a "Peace Officer" (look up the difference between
that and a LEO if you don't know) did you ever think you would be nothing more than a revenue generator?" His eyes bugged out and he got real nervous,
he realized he wasn't talking to a sheep. He said, "Our department only gets $3 per seat belt fine" I said, "I don't care, do you know there are real criminals
around here, Meth Labs, drug dealers, and here you are wasting your time with me, a tax paying, law abiding Citizen, why don't you go and catch some
real bad guys!?" Somewhere in my ranting  I told him that I "wear my seat belt religiously and I would see him in court" because I had it on, I figured it's his
word against mine. He wanted to tell me a story about safety and try to be my "buddy" and I said, "Just give me the ticket, I don't need to listen to your
preaching". Then he got that shocked look again and with shaking hands pointed at the ticket to explain what I needed to do, about calling this number
and marking the boxes, you know.
I felt pretty good about enlightening him about "bull crap laws" and how one Citizen anyway, ain't gonna take it. Now I have to go and fight this crap in
court, anyone have any experience at this and want to give me some advice?
If WE as a people don't get mad as hell and fight this crap WE are going to be corralled into a pen and charged with "chewing gum in bondage"!
If you still don't "get it", as I have a diverse audience here and you think "what's the big deal Don, pay the ticket and move on". Please tell me that, so I can
remove you from my mailing list, there really is no hope for you and you really should just go get your "chip" now and save the Powers that Be alot of
Just thought you might like to enjoy a story that happened "close to home". Taking any advice offered. Your friend, Don    

]My note: If anyone has any suggestions for Don to assist him in court please contact me and I will get you in touch with him.  Let's help one another folks
to restore our de jure republic of, by, and for the people. The  POLICE STATE,  called Michigan needs to be dismantled. <><]

Displaying 1 - 2 of 2
NOTICE TO ALL MEMBERS OF THE MICHIGAN CONGRESS As our elected representatives, the people of this state of Michigan present this notice to all
branches of Congress and local government that have sworn an Oath to support the Constitution of the United States including the Bill of Rights and the
Michigan Constitution. This notice is to let all members of congress and local government know you are very close, if not already, in violation of the oath of
office taken at the time of your employment by the people of Michigan. It would be a mistake to interpret the peoples silence prior to this notice as
acquiescence to this repugnant UN-constitutional decree. HLS does not have the constitutional authority to render Michigan a constitution free zone.Entire
From Detroit Free Press & The Detroit News on 2013-02-24  [Runs for seven days in print and online


As our elected representatives, the people of this state of Michigan present this NOTICE to all branches of Congress and local government that have sworn
an Oath to support the Constitution of the United States including the Bill of Rights and the Michigan Constitution. This notice is to let all members of
congress and local government know you are  very close, if not already in violation of the oath of office taken at the time of your employment by the
people of Michigan.  

It would be a mistake to interpret the peoples silence prior to this notice as  acquiescence  to this repugnant UN-constitutional decree. Homeland Security
(HLS) does not have the constitutional authority to render Michigan a constitution free zone.   Read complete


Original message
From: isaiah
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 12:39 AM
To: xxxxxx xxxxxx
Cc: xxxxx xxxxxx

FYI this is the one from  Indiana
Make ours very similar!
IF the Fed wants to cut grants or sharing funds we can cut out all their income!!

Here is the language of the ordinance:

An Ordinance, which shall be known and may be cited as the “2nd Amendment Preservation Ordinance.” To prevent federal infringement on the right to
keep and bear arms; nullifying all federal acts in violation of the 2nd Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. THE BOARD OF

SECTION 1: The Franklin County Board of Commissioners finds that: A. The 2nd Amendment to the Constitution of the United States reads as follows, “A
well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” B. All federal
acts, laws, orders, rules or regulations regarding firearms are a violation of the 2nd Amendment
A. The Franklin County Board of Commissioners declares that all federal acts, laws, orders, rules, regulations – past, present or future – in violation of the
2nd Amendment to the Constitution of the United States are not authorized by the Constitution of the United States and violate its true meaning and intent
as given by the Founders and Ratifiers; and are hereby declared to be invalid in this county, shall not be recognized by this county, are specifically
rejected by this county, and shall be considered null and void and of no effect in this county.
B. It shall be the duty of the Sheriff of this County to take all measures as may be necessary to prevent the enforcement of any federal acts, laws, orders,
rules, or regulations in violation of the 2nd Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. SECTION 3 EFFECTIVE DATE A. This act takes effect
upon approval by the Franklin County Board of Commissioners
copy and paste the following to an email and send to county council members or commissioners in your township or

    LOCAL 2ND AMENDMENT PRESERVATION ORDINANCE - _______________________________County, Michigan.
    An Ordinance, which shall be known and may be cited as the “2nd Amendment Preservation Ordinance.” To prevent federal
    infringement on the right to keep and bear arms; nullifying all federal acts in violation of the 2nd Amendment to the Constitution of
    the United States. THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF __________________ COUNTY DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:

    SECTION 1: The _______________________ County Board of Commissioners finds that: A. The 2nd Amendment to the Constitution of
    the United States reads as follows, “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to
    keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” B. All federal acts, laws, orders, rules or regulations regarding firearms are a violation of
    the 2nd Amendment

    A. The ________________County Board of Commissioners declares that all federal acts, laws, orders, rules, regulations – past,
    present or future – in violation of the 2nd Amendment to the Constitution of the United States are not authorized by the Constitution
    of the United States and violate its true meaning and intent as given by the Founders and Ratifiers; and are hereby declared to be
    invalid in this county, shall not be recognized by this county, are specifically rejected by this county, and shall be considered null
    and void and of no effect in this county.
    B. It shall be the duty of the Sheriff of this County to take all measures as may be necessary to prevent the enforcement of any
    federal acts, laws, orders, rules, or regulations in violation of the 2nd Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. SECTION 3
    EFFECTIVE DATE A. This act takes effect upon approval by the _____________________County Board of Commissioners.  DOC   PDF

~submitted by Gray Beard

[My note:  this is what everyone in  Michigan should start working on in their townships and counties, (change county to township in above form, and
commissioners to the terminology used in your area if different).  People really need to start showing up to the council (commissioners) meetings in their
township and counties.  As you meet people at these meetings form jural assemblies of the people to transition the “corporate commissioners” into a de
jure republic voice of, by, and for the people instead of the machine it now is to further the
corporate/socialist/communist/democratic/progressive/collectivist control agenda.<><]

From: isaiah
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 11:22 AM
To: undisclosed-recipients:
Subject: resolution VS Ordinance
The paper was calling it a Resolution but the actual wording is Ordnance.   The thing to remember is that a resolution has no force of law. The ordnance
will give the twp the opportunity to instruct the county sheriff to remove the Feds.  See if you can get an ordnance adopted in your area.  Mine is looking at
Resolution vs. Ordinance
Gilberton, PA is a small borough in Schuylkill County, with a population of about 840, but the little community took a big stand Thursday night.  “It`s about
time that the little guy stands up to the government and says we don`t want any change. This is the purpose of this. We want to continue to have our
Second Amendment rights, the right to bear arms and the right to choose,” said Mayor Mary Lou Hannon of Gilberton.

Borough council members unanimously passed a resolution in support of the Second Amendment at a packed council meeting. The resolution is also in
opposition to any local, state or federal regulations of firearms.

The resolution was the borough police chief’s idea and supported by dozens of folks who packed into the council meeting room, who applauded when
council members approved it.
~submitted by Gray Beard


State Rep. Tom McMillin today introduced legislation that prevents the federal government from imposing federal standards, curriculum and testing on
local schools, all of which constitute unfunded - and mostly undefined - mandates.

House Bill 4276  removes the state from participation in the Common Core State Standards Initiative, which McMillin said is a federal attempt to take
decision-making abilities from state and local school officials.

"We are expected to blindly accept these standards from the federal government, which thinks it knows what Michigan schoolchildren need in terms of
curriculum better than we do," said McMillin, R-Rochester Hills. "This is an obvious overreach by the federal government into our classrooms and we
should join the other states that have opted out of the initiative.
The federal government should not dictate what is taught in every classroom in the nation,
especially in Michigan.
~submitted by Cathy C

[My thought:  This is a good start for Michigan to start enacting the Tenth Amendment, but it needs to be enacted across the board for all unconstitutional
over-stepping powers by the Federal Corporation government and not just the ones that step on certain toes. The local communities should take back the
control of their schools and curriculum from the state. <><]


I suggest everyone take a look at the operating Constitution of Michigan, which is the 1963 Version, the later rulings are included with reference at the
bottom of each section. Two points of interest,  first the watered down generic oath of office, Article XI reads:

    Sec. 1. Oath of Public Officers.  "I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support the Constitution of the United States and the constitution
    of this state, and that I will faithfully discharge the duties of ________________________ according to the best of my ability."

They will "support", what happened to protect, defend, or uphold the Constitution?  Absolutely no accountability with such an ambiguous word as
"support."  but given the fact that this is clearly a Corporate Contract and not a Constitution of, by, and for the people of Michigan it really is not
surprising.  Second point of interest is found in Article IX:

    Sec. 1. Taxes for state expenses. The Legislature shall impose taxes sufficient with other resources to pay the expenses of state
    Sec. 2. Power of taxation, relinquishment.  The power of taxation shall never be surrendered, suspended or contracted away.

Notice how generic their oath of office for the people is, but how absolutely clear the intent of securing our financial resources for their existence is. No
ambiguity there   How many people in Michigan have even read this Corporate Contract, or recognize it as such.

No wonder Michigan was picked to become a "pilot police state", and perhaps that is the very reason the first implementation of fluoride into drinking water
was introduced in Grand Rapids first, before it went throughout the state and on to other states.  Now Michigan is a "
Constitution Free Zone" by decree
from Homeland Security, and what legislation has been put in place by our Michigan Congress to "support" the Constitutional Fourth Amendment, since
they have the "support" of the Tenth Amendment to do so. They are paid to represent the people of Michigan and to "SUPPORT" the Constitution, so it is
their duty to create Legislation to "Support" the Constitutional Rights of the people, that is their job.  We should not have to lobby for such protection, not
when it comes to the Bill of Rights.  The people of Michigan are already so oppressed due to the POLICE STATE statues, codes and laws, not to mention
the over-regulating of everything for so long that the duty of the Michigan Congress should be to spend time nullifying these repugnant laws for the
people, as the representatives of the people.

The Tenth Amendment is all the authority Congress needs to nullify repugnant unconstitutional laws coming out of DC, and if they are not going to do this
when it is THEIR JOB and DUTY to do so, then perhaps a RECALL is in order.

I suggest the people read the three constitution below and contrast the difference, the first is the operating 1963 used by the defacto corporate congress
of Michigan, the second is the original 1835 Constitution, and the third is the 1835 Revised, Ratified Constitution for the De Jure Republic for Michigan.
1963 Constitution operating today by defacto Michigan Congress
1835 First Constitution for Michigan, obtaining statehood
1835 Original Constitution Revised and Ratified
for the De Jure Republic for Michigan (Of course it is only provisional)
Citizen Guide to Defacto State Government - This is the current guide for the citizens of Michigan from the defacto Michigan Congress

When I put together the NOTICE to the members of Congress in Michigan, which I'm working on now, it needs to be sent out by you and others in your
area as well, and this can be by email.  I will be sending the notice  to all members via email and USPS mail, as well as a portion will be published but for
the sake of expense readers will than be directed to a web page set-up for it for more information.  This is a group effort that all the people need to let their
representatives know what is expected from them as "paid" representatives for the people.  I will send out information and try to make it as easy as
possible to take action.  The only way we are going to be able to transition our de jure republic of, by, and for the people back into existence to protect our
"Immunities" from an over-stepping tyrannical defacto Federal Government, and as it would appear, the defacto state level as well  is to implement them
at our township level by building jural assemblies of the people, and expand out from there.  That is where, we the people have the greatest power.<><


Using data provided by the U.S. Census Bureau, the ACLU has determined that nearly 2/3 of the entire US population (197.4 million people) live within 100
miles of the US land and coastal borders. The government is assuming extraordinary powers to stop and search individuals within this zone. This is not just
about the border: This " Constitution-Free Zone" includes most of the nation's largest metropolitan areas.  (Are You Living In A Constitution Free Zone?
See the interactive map >>)
We urge you to call on Congress to hold hearings on and pass legislation to end these egregious violations of Americans' civil rights.

Federal Reserve audit exposes major securities fraud and the embezzlement of $16 trillion

An audit of the Federal Reserve has revealed that the privately owned Federal Reserve secretly doled out more than $16 trillion in zero interest loans to
some of the largest financial institutions and corporations in the United States and throughout the world.  The non-partisan, investigative arm of Congress
also determined that the Fed acted illegally.  In fact, according to the report, the Fed provided conflict of interest waivers to its employees and private
contractors so they could keep investments in the same financial institutions and corporations that were given emergency loans.  The report is evidence
that reveals major securities fraud in the embezzlement of $16 trillion by the Federal Reserve.
$16 trillion is 10 times more than what the U.S. Congress authorized and Bush ($700 billion) and Obama ( $787 billion) signed off on.  The Federal
Reserve was only authorized by Congress to use $1.487 trillion in federal tax dollars in bailouts.  The Federal Reserve embezzled another $14.5 trillion.
The Congressional report determined that the Fed secretly hide most of the embezzled money into their own banks.  The rest the Fed unilaterally
transferred trillions of dollars to foreign banks and corporations from South Korea to Scotland.  Foreign banks and corporations which the Federal
Reserve bankers had a personal financial interest or stake in.

    From: isaiah
    To: Bonnie
    Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2013 6:55 PM
    Subject: Re: Insurance

    A thought for you,  can you put a question on one of the web pages and see if others are having troubles  with their ins co?
    Is there anyone out there having troubles with your homeowners or country estate insurance ?
    if so reply here?  EMAIL

You Can't Ban Evil

This young lady hits the nail on the head, telling a side of the gun control issue that unfortunately most have either never thought about or pretend to be
ignorant as to the real purpose behind the 2nd Amendment!  (You know for a fact that the self-serving politicians in Washington know the intent and
purpose of the 2nd Amendment but want to exercise their power and control over us and are afraid their corrupt regime might be overthrown some day!)
Take a couple minutes to listen to what a very bright young black woman has learned...

February 15, 2013  Oath Keepers » Stewart Rhodes Speaks at Albany New York Gun Rights Rally on February 12

Oath Keepers Founder Stewart Rhodes gave a fiery speech to approximately 3,000 New York gun owners, urging them to refuse to comply to the “SAFE
Act,” to refuse to disarm, to nullify at every level. He also urged them to make sure their county was a “Molon Labe” county, asking them “is your county a
‘come and take it’ county, or is it a ‘bend over and take it’ county? Which is it?! Find out now!” He told them to make sure all the gun owners and veterans
in their county are ready to stand up, and will commit to refuse to comply, and then go to the sheriff and the police chief of their town and put them on
notice that they are expected to choose sides. He told the crowd to use April 19, 2013, the upcoming anniversary of the battle of Lexington and Concord,
in 1775, as the deadline for their sheriff, police chiefs [and all other oath sworn public servants] to choose sides — “are they patriots, or are they
redcoats?” at the rally Oath Keepers had the effigies of Cuomo, Schumer, Bloomberg, and other oath breaking traitors dressed up in red coats, with signs
hanging around their necks saying “Oath Breaker,” “Red Coat” and “Traitor”
Then retired New York State Police (Highway Patrol) officer John Wallace, a member of Oath Keepers, led thousands of New Yorkers in an oath
renewal/oath taking ceremony, pledging to defend the Constitution and to not disarm  

[My thought:  It is my hope there can be peaceful resolution, that all the newly sworn oath keepers will take this oath back to their communities to help more
people to STAND UP and claim what is already ours,and always has been, but to do so with a calm, firm RESOLVE using their VOICE to kick the
progressives out of their communities and reinstate new laws of, by, and for the people in accordance with the Constitution - Bill of Rights, standing on first
our God given Rights, next our Declaration of Independence given to us by our very wise forefathers. We do NOT ACQUIESCE, and all we have to do is


----- Forwarded Message ----
Sent: Thu, February 14, 2013 11:20:09 AM
Subject: One Easy Lesson
Greetings and Salutations on this Happy Valentine's Day,

We all have busy/full lives.  If you have not taken the time to become familiar with UN Agenda 21/Sustainability/Place Making/Smart Growth/Walking
Community, etc., you Need to do so.  Go to the site at the very bottom.

I have previously sent out info regarding this topic, made two presentations to my local Boyne City Commissioners, and more.  I just came upon this site
and found it concise as well as an excellent source for additional related info.  There is so much information out there, but requires some digging/time.

The common rebuttal by those that are knowingly or unknowingly involved is that it is partisan, we just use the same terms, fear mongering by the Tea
Party, a conspiracy theory, the UN has no control over us, etc.

Many who are strongly into conservation and the environment are finding they have been infiltrated and being used by this agenda.  Many groups and
ideas initially had good intentions which were introduced and talked about with very nice community friendly verbiage, but are really being manipulated by
ICLEI and others often through acquiring grants only after becoming a member.   Grant writing, if you have not noticed, has become a new art form.   

Follow the money, as some of it comes from our tax dollars through the EPA and other agencies in our government.  Did they need Congressional
Approval?   Other money comes from foundations like the Kellogg Foundation, Tides Foundation, and other huge money pots.  Just research the sources
of their funding.

This is very organized, tenacious, well funded and wears Many Masks.  Behind the Green Mask is a book written by Rosa Koire whose web site www.    is found on the site at the bottom.

Our potus plans much more for his  (O for A) You heard or heard about his plans for the future on many topics in his S of the U.   
One is the Environment (made into the new religion).  He plans on changes even if Congress does not comply.....yet more Exec. Orders.  People will be
entering our communities or people already there using the avenues already in place to start small and grow.  Just like the population, where do you begin
to indoctrinate, with the easiest and the youngest of us, our children.  Make sure you know what your children/grandchildren are learning in school,
reading, and watching on TV (now there is another interesting topic).  So this idea has and is going to get stronger, so be very aware of what is going on in
your communities, counties, state regions, states, etc.  When you can and need to...Speak Up.  Being Forewarned is Forearmed    Nothing worse than
being Blindsided.   This is only one of many issues.  Scary!
•        one easy lesson - What Is Agenda 21
All part of Agenda 21 policy. Economic Prosperity? Public Private Partnerships (PPP). ... ICLEI – Local Governments for Sustainability (formally, ...
Be Well, God Bless You and Yours,  and  God Bless America          Carole
Carpe Diem,   

    1828 Definition ACQUIESCE, v.i. acquiess'. [L. acquiesco, of ad and quiesco, to be quiet; quies, rest.]

    1. To rest satisfied, or apparently satisfied, or to rest without opposition and discontent; usually implying previous opposition, uneasiness, or
    dislike, but ultimate compliance, or submission; as, to acquiesce in the dispensations of providence.

    2. To assent to, upon conviction; as, to acquiesce in an opinion; that is, to rest satisfied of its correctness, or propriety.

    Acquiesced in, in a passive sense, complied with; submitted to, without opposition; as, a measure has been acquiesced in.1913
    DefinitionAcquiesce (acquiesce)
    v. i. ((?))
    [imp. *** p. p. Acquiesced (&?]); p. pr. *** vb. n. Acquiescing (&?])] [L. acquiescere; ad + quiescere to be quiet, fr. quies rest: cf. F. acquiescer.

    1.To rest satisfied, or apparently satisfied, or to rest without opposition and discontent (usually implying previous opposition or discontent); to
    accept or consent by silence or by omitting to object; -- followed by in, formerly also by with and to.
    They were compelled to acquiesce in a government which they did not regard as just.
    De Quincey.

    1.To concur upon conviction; as, to acquiesce in an opinion; to assent to; usually, to concur, not heartily but so far as to forbear opposition.
    Syn. -- To submit; comply; yield; assent; agree; consent; accede; concur; conform; accept tacitly.
How is the DEFACTO US CORPORATE GOVERNMENT able to do all they do?  Because
by our SILENCE, we ACQUIESCE.  It is time to speak up, and
let them KNOW we do NOT ACQUIESCE peaceably, but with firm RESOLVE.


DHS Nullifies Fourth Amendment Rights of Millions of Americans  
The Fourth Amendment to the US Constitution reads:
“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated,
and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the
persons or things to be seized.”
The Department of Homeland Security doesn’t believe in the Fourth Amendment and has recently issued statements to that affect. They are claiming that
if you live within 100 miles of the international border that they have the right to search all electronic devices, including cell phones and laptop and tablet
computers without probable cause or first securing a warrant. The 100 mile distance is being referred to as the border security search zones.

This would include cities such as San Diego, Escondido, El Centro, Yuma, Tucson, Las Cruces, Carlsbad, El Paso, Brownsville, Seattle, Grand Forks,
Toledo, Cleveland, Erie, Buffalo, Rochester, Syracuse, and Montpelier to name just a few.

But wait, it gets even better! If you live anywhere in Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Hawaii, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, New Hampshire, New Jersey
or Rhode Island, DHS says the search zones encompass the entire state. Let’s not leave New York, Pennsylvania and Virginia out of the fun, because
large areas of these states are also being designated as search zones.

If you live anywhere in any of the designated search zones, the feds claim to have the right to invade your privacy and conduct an unconstitutional search
of your private possessions without any probable cause or warrant. If you ask me, this sounds a lot like the Gestapo under Adolf Hitler in Nazi Germany,
which is what I compared the Department of Homeland Security to in an earlier article. This just helps to reinforce my claims.  
Read more:
~submitted by Cathy C

February 14, 2013    Dr. Edwin Vieira on The Militia - NewsWithViews.TV

Published on Feb 7, 2013
While most of the recent gun-control debate is focused on the individual right to bear arms could it be that we are focusing on the wrong battle?
Constitutional expert Dr. Edwin Vieira joins us to explain that not only is the "Militia" not a four-letter word, but that our Founders determined that it was
"necessary for the security of a free state." Allow Dr. Vieira to explain to you why the need for a "well-regulated militia" is the backbone to the right to keep
and bear arms. You will never again look at this issue in the same way.
[My note:  This is the most informative information yet concerning our Second Amendment Right, please take the time to listen]


    1828 Definition:   UNA'LIENABLE, a. Not alienable; that cannot be alienated; that may not be transferred; as unalienable rights.
    1913 Definition Unalienable (unalienable)
    a.  Un*al"ien*a*ble (?)

    1.Inalienable; as, unalienable rights.
    Swift. -- Un*al"ien*a*bly, adv.
[Notice the change in the enunciation from 1828 to 1913, but remember the definition and what this word means]

Need your ACTION

Circulate this to as many people as you can to sign and send out ASAP
"They deserve a vote,” Obama said last night in his SOTU speech. They being the gun control activists.
Well, us anti gun control activists also deserve a vote…well congressmen Stockman, and Broun have answer the call to
Click on this link to contact your congressman telling them to support corgessmen Stockman, and Broun.  see if you can blast this out…’s going viral on FB
Lots of people are talking about stuff to do, but not many are taking action…now is the time for action….

[We also deserved a vote, Mr. Obama, but we didn't get it from Harry Reid!]

~submitted by Cathy C


I know many people have a great deal of difficulty comprehending just how many wars are started for no other purpose than to force private central banks
onto nations, so let me share a few examples, so that you understand why the US Government is mired in so many wars against so many foreign nations.
There is ample precedent for this.
The United States fought the American Revolution primarily over King George III's Currency act, which forced the colonists to conduct their business only
using printed bank notes borrowed from the Bank of England at interest. After the revolution, the new United States adopted a radically different economic
system in which the government issued its own value-based money, so that private banks like the Bank of England were not siphoning off the wealth of the
people through interest-bearing bank notes.
~submitted by Bulldog75

WHEN TO SHOOT A COP [Please watch the video before making a snap judgement based on this title]

----- Original Message -----
From: xxxxx  xxxxxxxx
To: undisclosed recipients:
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 9:44 PM
Subject: When to shoot a cop?

I'm not advocating that, but be honest, if there is never a situation where that may be needed, you might as well prepare to get on the "cattle cars" now!
[My thought:  This was sent to me by someone and they will remain anonymous due to the fear this title invokes in many.  Is there a time to shoot a cop,
lets rephrase it with
"Is there a time to defend oneself from the criminal intent of another?"  The title is suggestive and provokes fear in many
people, and the reason for this is that people are programmed to read, "one liners" from email and text messages that they no longer read the essence of
what is truly being said.  Before you along with many others make a quick judgement based solely on the title,  please listen to the video and what it is
saying.  This person is exercising his First Amendment Right.  He is not advocating anything nor suggesting anything other then truth.  People have a
RIGHT to defend themselves, whether it is with a fist, knife, gun, or ball bat, and it doesn't matter if it is against a home invader that is a drug dealer,
plumber, or that's right police officer that is corrupt and stepping outside his oath of office and breaking the very laws taken to defend the people, but now
is using that position to harm their life, or that of their families. a people need to bring back truth, honor, and justice to our nation, and especially
our state (Tenth Amendment). If we expect to be free we must accept the responsibility of "self-governance" that comes with that freedom, and part of that
responsibility is holding ALL criminals accountable, no matter their office or position.  NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW, NOT EVEN THOSE THAT ARE IN
In closing I will make this statement, "violence begans violence so it should never be the first choice for resolution, but defending one's life, family, or
neighbor from
unjust lethal force is not violence defined by criminal intent, it is Self-Defense, and that is the GOD GIVEN RIGHT of a FREE


Critical condition....
"It is the sacred principles enshrined in the United Nations charter to which the American people will henceforth pledge their allegiance.” George H. W.
Bush, addressing the General Assembly of the U.N. February 1, 1992.....he said WHAT???  
~submitted by Judd


Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 5:40 AM
Subject: Fwd: Rights are protected by Constitution - not provided by Constitution!

There is an un-known number of Americans that support the truths told in this man's letter below. That un-known number is not small by any means.  This
subject is being pushed to a head by our government for reasons other than the latest school shooting.  The government is merely taking advantage of
that tragedy to move forward with plans they already had in place.  As I continue to receive thousands upon thousands of similar pieces to the one I am
forwarding below, I know that our country is headed for real problems as written below.  These Americans are not afraid to defend their rights and our
current government seems hell-bent on proceeding with an unconstitutional plan to remove their/our rights, so what do you think will ultimately happen
here?  Which side of this stand-off will you end up on?  Think about where this problem has come form originally!  Did guns get us into this Government
against the people situation?  Did guns cause our elected leaders to stop doing their jobs of protecting our nation and us?
Here is what Wikipedia has to say about the author:

    Dean Garrison (born 1955) is a contemporary American author and crime fiction novelist. He was born in Michigan , grew up in the Indiana , Illinois ,
    and Texas , and received his B.A. degree from Ferris State University in Big Rapids, Michigan . Garrison is a Crime Scene Technician in West
    Michigan . His research in the fields of crime scene investigation and Shooting Reconstruction are widely published in forensic journals under the
    name "D.H. Garrison, Jr."

    Subject: If They Come for Your Guns, Do You Have a Responsibility to Fight?
    Posted on January 3, 2013 by Dean Garrison
    I feel a tremendous responsibility to write this article though I am a little apprehensive. Thinking about the possibility of rising up against our own
    government is a frightening thing for many of us. I am not Johnny Rambo and I will be the first to admit that I do not want to die. The reason I feel
    compelled to write this, however, is simply because I don’t think the average American is equipped with the facts. I feel that a lot of American citizens
    feel like they have no choice but to surrender their guns if the government comes for them. READ MORE
~submitted by Richard
Guns Across America Rally - Michigan Jan 19th 2013
GAA Rally January 19th 2013 State Capitol Building, Lansing Michigan. Freedom lovers and defenders of our Constitution turned out to stand and be
counted in a peaceful and civil demonstration in support of the 2nd Amendment. You're looking at the safest place to be in Michigan on this particular
afternoon... Among responsible and law abiding gun owners! There are three parts , this is number two

Anti-Gun Rally Held in Southfield
Listen carefully to the last gentleman speaking and what he has to say, very important message. This was recorded by Fox News
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 4:37 AM
Subject: The Creator's "remedy"
    "WHY won't those in seats of power respect our documents?  Because sadly, once any new officials get into any offices (including even those who
    are truly well intended) they are quickly but secretly "made aware" of much more than our Constitutional minds previously understood regarding the
    power that is really calling the shots.  On the surface they WANT you to think that the Constitution can still save us, as this keeps us peasants from
    searching for and discovering the real layers where the criminal "slave" system really operates". READ MORE
~submitted by Dwaine

February 11, 2013  ATTENTION - Constitutional Sheriff's Leadership Call   

Anyone interested in learning how Constitutional Sheriff's Association will be attempting to unite the people in the nearly 3,100 counties in local groups.
We will be establishing websites for each county where the people will be able to educate themselves and discuss critical local issues. To restore America
we need to begin by restoring our counties. Please listen to the call live by calling (347)884-9499 or click on the following link and listen to the archived
show at your convenience.
The show is schedule for Tuesday, February 11, 2013 at 6:00 PM Pacific Standard Time  
Leadership Call for the Constitutional Sheriff's Association
~submitted by WRAM

Please share this article from the Wall Street Journal  on the Constitutionality of Gun control.

Thanks much!


Gun Control and the Constitution
The courts would no more allow government to undermine the Second Amendment than the First..

Could there be a better illustration of the cultural divide over firearms than the White House photograph of our skeet-shooting president? Clay pigeons are
launched into the air, but the president's smoking shotgun is level with the ground. This is not a man who is comfortable around guns. And that goes a
long way toward explaining his gun-control agenda.

Lack of informed presidential leadership aside, there is a gulf between those Americans who view guns as invaluable tools for self-defense, both against
private wrongdoers and a potentially tyrannical government, and those who regard that concept as hopelessly archaic and even subversive. For them,
hunting is the only possible legitimate use of firearms, and gun ownership should be restricted to weapons suited to that purpose.

But while the level of the policy discourse leaves much to be desired, its constitutional dimensions are even more dimly recognized, much less seriously
engaged. Yet the debate over guns, as is the case with many other contentious issues in American history, cannot be intelligently pursued without
recognizing its constitutional dimensions. The Supreme Court's 2008 decision in Heller v. District of Columbia confirmed that the Second Amendment
means what it says: "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."

After Heller and its follow-on case, McDonald v. Chicago, which applied the Second Amendment rights to the states, what government cannot do is deny
the individual interest in self-defense. As a legal matter, that debate is settled.

The president and his allies seem to have missed the message, as demonstrated by his continued insistence that most of the American people, including
many hunters, support his proposed gun-control measures. Even if that claim were true, constitutionally protected rights are guarded with particular vigor
precisely when public opinion turns against them. Meanwhile, the president's continued appeals to emotion, capitalizing on a series of tragic mass
shootings, also ill-fit what ought to be a serious and dispassionate discussion.

While the courts are still sorting out Heller's implications, politicians should not assume that they have a free hand to restrict private gun ownership.
Decades of case law interpreting and applying the other provisions of the Bill of Rights show that there are hard-and-fast limits on gun control.

The general framework is straightforward and certainly well-known to those who have studied (let alone taught) constitutional law. The government cannot
abridge constitutionally protected rights simply to make a symbolic point or because it feels that something must be done. Any measure must be justified
by a legitimate government interest that is compelling or at least important. At the same time, any regulation must be "narrowly tailored" to achieve that

On that basis, in a recent case the Supreme Court struck down a federal ban on depictions of animal cruelty, rejecting the government's argument that it
had any legitimate interest in banning pictures and videos associated with crimes, and finding—even assuming the government's interest—that the statute
swept up too much protected speech. In this way, judicial balancing requires a careful weighing of the government's interests against the individual's, with
a thumb on the scale in favor of the individual.

But you wouldn't know that from the current gun-control debate. Several states, for example, are considering gun-insurance mandates modeled after those
for automobile insurance. There is no conceivable public-safety benefit: Insurance policies cover accidents, not intentional crimes, and criminals with illegal
guns will just evade the requirement. The real purpose is to make guns less affordable for law-abiding citizens and thereby reduce private gun ownership.
Identical constitutionally suspect logic explains proposals to tax the sale of bullets at excessive rates.

The courts, however, are no more likely to allow government to undermine the Second Amendment than to undermine the First. A state cannot circumvent
the right to a free press by requiring that an unfriendly newspaper carry millions in libel insurance or pay a thousand-dollar tax on barrels of ink—the real
motive, in either case, would be transparent and the regulation struck down. How could the result be any different for the right to keep and bear arms?

The same constitutional infirmity plagues the president's plan. Consider his proposal for a new "assault weapons" ban, targeting a class of weapons
distinguished by their cosmetic features, such as a pistol grip or threaded barrel. These guns may look sinister, but they don't differ from other common
weapons in any relevant respect—firing mechanism, ammunition, magazine size—and so present no greater threat to public safety. Needless to say, the
government has no legitimate interest in banning guns that gun-controllers simply do not like and would not, themselves, care to own.

Also constitutionally suspect are restrictions on magazine size. There is no question that a limit of 10 rounds (as the president has proposed) or seven (as
enacted by New York state last month) would impair the right to self-defense. A magazine with 10 rounds may provide adequate protection against a single
nighttime intruder. But it may not: What if there are two intruders?

Further compounding the constitutional problem is the fact that the benefit of such limits is questionable. For a practiced and calm shooter, swapping
magazines takes no more than a couple of seconds. And a swap may not even be necessary if the shooter has multiple guns, as in several mass
shootings in recent years.

While some limit on magazines may be constitutionally permissible, one that falls below the capabilities of guns in common usage for self-defense is
probably not. The most popular guns for self-defense take 15 or so rounds in their default configurations. Given the uncertain benefit of restricting
magazine size, not to mention the tens of millions of "high capacity" magazines in circulation, something near that number may be a constitutional minimum.

And while there is no question that procedural requirements like background checks are permissible, that does not mean that the government may place
an undue burden on the right of law-abiding citizens to protect themselves. Excessive waiting periods, registration fees and the like are all subject to
scrutiny, lest they infringe on constitutionally guaranteed rights.

At bottom, the Constitution requires sensible and effective regulation of guns that respects and upholds this most fundamental right. Policies motivated by
nothing more than discomfort with firearms, often born of a lack of experience, fall far short.

Messrs. Rivkin and Grossman practice law in the Washington, D.C., office of Baker Hostetler. Mr. Rivkin served in the Justice Department and the White
House Counsel's Office in the Reagan and George H.W. Bush administrations.
~submitted by Gray Beard

February 09, 2013    Dr. Benjamin Carson's Amazing Speech at the National Prayer Breakfast with Obama Present

Dr. Carson addresses some of the issues facing America today by using sound reasoning and common sense solution, very refreshing... WATCH HERE

February 08, 2013   Carl Miller - The Constitution And The Bill Of Rights
    Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 5:41 PM

    I have studies in many subjects. Carl Miller is my champion! Look on youtube for him on constitutional rights. [emphasis added]
    Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone
~submitted by Tim P

[My note: I looked for Carl Miller on youtube and of course found him, he's here in Michigan!  He shares a lot of information in simple language.   VIDEO 1   
2  3 ]


Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 11:02 AM
Subject: Gun control

Governor Snyder,

This is a  request to sign a bill into law a bill  prohibiting any Federal gun control Laws or Regulations that are not in harmony with the Second Amendment
to the Organic Constitution of the United States.
ANY AND ALL DOCUMENTS OR LAWS REPUGNANT TO THE ABOVE DOCUMENT shall be rendered Null N Void and None Enforceable in the Township
and County described.
There is No delegation of power to any member of government to infringe on the Second Amendment!! Thus the term Shall Not Be Infringed!

Note ,The term in the Second Amendment “A Well Regulated Militia.”
Well Regulated has nothing whats so ever to do with any type of government control!
The term means that you are proficient in the use of your arms !
The definitions at the time can be found on this web site
( along with a lot of other good information.
Home page

Some food for thought in some other Nations like Switzerland where it is a requirement to have a military type weapon's and ammunition in every home and
are required to attend regular training crime is near non existent.
Grey Beard

[My note: It would be great if everyone would email, send a letter, or call with this request to protect the people from the over-stepping power of the
Federal Government, reference  the Tenth Amendment and also scroll down to UNODA Article, then go to the
Militia page and scroll to read the DICK

From the
Tenth Amendment Center:
    The Tenth Amendment was intended to confirm the understanding of the people at the time the Constitution was adopted, that powers not granted
    to the United States were reserved to the States or to the people. It added nothing to the instrument as originally ratified.” – United States v.
    Sprague, 282 U.S. 716, 733 (1931).

    The founding fathers had good reason to pen the Tenth Amendment.

    The issue of power – and especially the great potential for a power struggle between the federal and the state governments – was extremely
    important to the America’s founders. They deeply distrusted government power, and their goal was to prevent the growth of the type of government
    that the British has exercised over the colonies.

    Adoption of the Constitution of 1787 was opposed by a number of well-known patriots including Patrick Henry, Samuel Adams, Thomas Jefferson,
    and others. They passionately argued that the Constitution would eventually lead to a strong, centralized state power which would destroy the
    individual liberty of the People. Many in this movement were given the poorly-named tag “Anti-Federalists.”

    The Tenth Amendment was added to the Constitution of 1787 largely because of the intellectual influence and personal persistence of the Anti-
    Federalists and their allies.

    It’s quite clear that the Tenth Amendment was written to emphasize the limited nature of the powers delegated to the federal government. In
    delegating just specific powers to the federal government, the states and the people, with some small exceptions, were free to continue exercising
    their sovereign powers.

    When states and local communities take the lead on policy, the people are that much closer to the policymakers, and policymakers are that much
    more accountable to the people. Few Americans have spoken with their president; many have spoken with their mayor.

    Adherence to the Tenth Amendment is the first step towards ensuring liberty in the United States. Liberty through decentralization.

The Bill of Rights is under attack, not just the Second Amendment but all of them in some form or another. They all must stand or none can stand and the
over-reaching power of the Federal Corporate Government is chipping away at them, we need to stop this chipping by NOT COMPROMISING ON ANY OF


Texas lawmakers have decided they want to rein in a controversial public school curriculum content and management system that at one point taught
“Allah is God."

Most of the state’s classrooms, some 80 percent, are using the
CSCOPE program that also has raised eyebrows because educators had refused to allow
parents and others to see what being taught.

Twenty-five state representatives now have signed onto a proposed oversight statute that would target CSCOPE, the online system that set up firewalls
and passwords so that parents would not be able to see the curriculum.

Bill author State Rep. Steve Toth said, “It’s imperative that we bring CSCOPE under the direction and oversight of the locally elected members of the State
Board of Education. Repeated instances of impropriety along with a decidedly liberal leaning agenda makes this move of the utmost importance. ISDs all
over the State of Texas have been misled as to what CSCOPE is and what it contains. We’ve got to get this right.”

[My thought:  This could be very good for the rest of the country because most of our nations curriculum begins in Texas, but we need parents attending
the school board meetings and find out what their children are "really" being taught. It is our responsibility as parents, NOT the "village" or the UN to decide
for us.  We must become actively involved in our children's education, and it has been that inactively that is one of the variables in so many of our children
graduating without the ability to read or comprehend what is being read.  Michigan can do this too but we need parents that will stand up and say,
"enough".  When our schools started programming propaganda in the 70's by moving away from proper education, that is when many parents decided to
home-school their children. It was good for their children and their education, but unfortunately it did nothing to undo what was taking place in our schools
and now we see the results of that shift away from true education to social programming.<><]

February 06, 2013 [More action being taken by the people]  121101-Citizens Grand Jury Indictment
----- Original Message -----
To: xxxxx xxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2013 9:23 AM
Subject: Fw: Federal Court Indicts [attachment linked above]

This transgression makes Watergate look like something from the sandbox.
This is only the tip of the berg.

"If you are willing to sell your freedom for short term financial security, real or perceived, the willingness to sell your very soul can’t be far behind."    
Joe Bannister
"When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken, or cease to be honest." Unknown
Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for dinner.  Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote.


Small Arms
Insurgents, armed gang members, pirates, terrorists - they can all multiply their force through the use of unlawfully acquired firepower. The illicit circulation
of small arms, light weapons and their ammunition destabilizes communities, and impacts security and development in all regions of the world.

A worldwide scourge
The illicit trade in small arms, light weapons and ammunition wreaks havoc everywhere. Mobs terrorizing a neighbourhood. Rebels attacking civilians or
peacekeepers. Drug lords randomly killing law enforcers or anyone else interfering with their illegal businesses. Bandits hijacking humanitarian aid
convoys. In all continents, uncontrolled small arms form a persisting problem.

COMMON SENSE IMPLEMENTED:  First, where does the United Nations (UN) get the right to interfere with a Sovereign People (Americans) and our
RIGHTS? By their own words "ILLICIT TRADE" they are saying there is NO PROTECTION for the people, but yet they want to take the weapons that LAW
ABIDING PEOPLE would have for protection of self and their family.  Carefully read the above two paragraphs which are directly from UNODA, link above.  
Now really think about this for a moment and answer this question:  Do you really think a ban on small arms will keep you safe from "ILLICIT GUN
TRADE"?  Do you think this illicit trade will stop?  Now think about "Fast and Furious", the US CORPORATE GOVERNMENT GAVE WEAPONS TO THE
MEXICAN DRUG CARTEL, really think about that for a moment. Do you really want only the GOVERNMENT AND THE DRUG LORDS OR LAW BREAKERS
There is going to be another vote in March on the UN Small Arms Gun Ban.  Contrast this against  Switzerland that has the lowest crime rate in the world,
is it because their guns are banned?  No, it is just the opposite, every home has a rifle and/or a handgun, that is at least about 99% of them, contrast that
with Chicago that has some of the most stringent gun laws in the country and  crime is very high, and look at what Australia  has to say since their guns
have been banned

NO AMERICAN should be supporting this or any ban on weapons of any kind in our country, and if they do , they are NOT AMERICANS in the true sense
of the word, because it is not only our Bill of Rights, but it is also COMMON SENSE for our own protection. There are Americans that are US citizens only to
conduct commerce; then there are US citizens that are married to the system in ideology and perhaps even took an Oath to the UNITED NATIONS, and in
their mind it supersedes their Constitutional Oath to the people, such as politicians and
provocateurs to do their bidding (Agent (Provocateur Law &
Legal Definition ... Disrupt the activities of radical political groups in the U.S)

We already have all the laws we need against criminals having guns, but yet they still have them, and they still will if they are banned.  Has anyone heard
of the 'Black Market'!  Look back at history, the first act that took place before complete tyranny of the people BY THEIR OWN GOVERNMENT was a
banning of guns, the ability to protect themselves. Contrary to what some people choose to believe this CAN happen in America and is.

If common sense doesn't speak to your heart, then let me share this information:  

    "Reid v. Covert, 354 U.S. 1 (1957), is a landmark case in which the United States Supreme Court ruled
    that the Constitution supersedes international treaties ratified by the United States Senate."

With this ruling the DEFACTO UNITED STATES CORPORATE GOVERNMENT would once again be ignoring the LAW if they attempt to enact the UNITED
NATIONS Small Arms Treaty that is in conflict with our Constitutional BILL OF RIGHTS that BIND THE OVER-STEPPING REACH OF THE GOVERNMENT
against the American people.  Then follow the above case with the below information:
    BLACK, J., Judgment of the Court - SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES - 354 U.S. 1 - Reid v. Covert

    Article VI, the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution, declares:

    This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof, and all Treaties made, or which shall be made,
    under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; . . .

    There is nothing in this language which intimates that treaties and laws enacted pursuant to them do not have to comply with the provisions of the
    Constitution. Nor is there anything in the debates which accompanied the drafting and ratification of the Constitution which even suggests such a
    result. These debates, as well as the history that surrounds the adoption of the treaty provision in Article VI, make it clear that the reason treaties
    were not limited to those made in "pursuance" of the Constitution was so that agreements made by the United States under the Articles of
    Confederation, including the important peace treaties which concluded the Revolutionary [p17] War, would remain in effect. [n31] It would be
    manifestly contrary to the objectives of those who created the Constitution, as well as those who were responsible for the Bill of Rights -- let alone
    alien to our entire constitutional history and tradition -- to construe Article VI as permitting the United States to exercise power under an international
    agreement without observing constitutional prohibitions. [n32] In effect, such construction would permit amendment of that document in a manner
    not sanctioned by Article V. The prohibitions of the Constitution were designed to apply to all branches of the National Government, and they cannot
    be nullified by the Executive or by the Executive and the Senate combined.

    There is nothing new or unique about what we say here. This Court has regularly and uniformly recognized the supremacy of the Constitution over a
    treaty. [n33] For example, in Geofroy v. Riggs, 133 U.S. 258, 267, it declared:

    The treaty power, as expressed in the Constitution, is in terms unlimited except by those restraints which are found in that instrument against
    the action of the government or of its departments, and those arising from the nature of the government itself and of that of the States. It
    would not be contended that it extends so far as to authorize what the Constitution forbids, or a change in the character of the [p18]
    government, or in that of one of the States, or a cession of any portion of the territory of the latter, without its consent.

    This Court has also repeatedly taken the position that an Act of Congress, which must comply with the Constitution, is on a full parity with a treaty,
    and that, when a statute which is subsequent in time is inconsistent with a treaty, the statute to the extent of conflict renders the treaty null. [n34] It
    would be completely anomalous to say that a treaty need not comply with the Constitution when such an agreement can be overridden by a statute
    that must conform to that instrument. Reference

So, how do we combat such blatant corruption of our BILL OF RIGHTS by those that are suppose to be protecting them?  Well, here is one way that
people are taking action.  This was sent to me today:

    From: isaiah
    Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2013 6:24 AM
    To: undisclosed-recipients:
    Subject: this is going to my local boards, give me your input

    The below should be done in every twp and county and state.

    February 8 2013

    TO Newberg Township and Cass County Board Commissioners,

    A open request to adopt An ordnance prohibiting any Federal gun control Laws that are not in harmony with the Second
    Amendment to the Organic Constitution of the United States.


    NOTE: The term in the Second Amendment, “A Well Regulated Militia.” Well regulated has nothing whatsoever to do with any
    type of government control!
    The term means that you are “proficient in the use of your arms!”
    The definitions at the time can be found on this web site (  along with a lot of
    other good information.
    home page
    Some food for thought in some other Nations where it is a requirement to have a military type weapon and ammunition in every
    home and they are required to attend regular training the crime is near non existent, Switzerland is one and they have the
    lowest crime rate in the world.

This is what it takes people, we are the solution, and its right where we are, and we must, with RESOLVE demand our RIGHTS be protected, and. what
good is the UN Small Arms Ban if each local township, city and/or state has laws making it null and void?  The same can be done for all the other atrocities
that are being carried out on the American people. We...the people, which is "of, by, and for the people" can get it done if we come together in our own
communities to protect our own RIGHTS.  It is lawful, and our DUTY to do so, reference
"The Declaration of Independence:
    The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,

    "When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the
    political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the
    earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle
    them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes
    which impel them to the separation.

    We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by
    their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit
    of Happiness.— That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving
    their just powers from the consent of the governed,— That whenever any Form of Government
    becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to
    institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in
    such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence,
    indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and
    transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to
    suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they
    are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same
    Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty,
    to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.— Such has
    been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains
    them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great
    Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the
    establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a
    candid world." [ Read the Facts by scrolling down on the DOI Document]

My final note is, I pray every American will ponder the information presented and each individual will search their heart for TRUTH and stand on that truth,
because that is what separated America from the rest of the world, not the US Government, but the SOVEREIGN PEOPLE and the RIGHTS given to us by
OUR CREATOR.  This is why so many migrated to America, something that most all natural Americans do not understand, but soon will if this self-
destructive course we're on is not diverted.
A very wise person said, "The cork won't pop until pressure is applied at the bottom".  Are we going to lawfully and peaceably "pop the cork" and "release
our freedom out of the hands of those that are attempting to take them, instead of honoring their oaths to protect them? <><


    -----Original Message-----
    From: isaiah
    Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2013 12:11 PM

    I see several writers on this news site talking about the organic constitution . The issuer you fail to see is the fact that the constitution is not in
    control or law at this time!. You are living under a corporate charter, see act of 1871, and the Emergency war powers Act of 1933!!
    The criminals in Washington DISTRICT OF CRIMINALS are not going to give up their GRAVY TRAIN . The only thing that can be done is the people
    all have to come together and enforce the Declaration of Independence and abolish this whole and complete form of government and start over new.

Article:  Nullification Deniers:  What James Madison Really Said posted on

    This is The Age of Ignorance. Our “intellectuals” can’t think. Our “scholars” parrot each other. The self-educated fixate on idiotic theories. Our
    People despise Truth and disseminate lies.
    Nullification deniers such as Matthew Spalding of Heritage Foundation, Jarrett Stepman of Human Events, law professor Randy Barnett, David
    Barton of Wallbuilders, and history professor Allen C. Guelzo, say that nullification by States of unconstitutional acts of the federal government is
    unlawful and impossible. They make the demonstrably false assertions that:
    • States don’t have the right to nullify unconstitutional acts of the federal government because our Constitution doesn’t say they can do it;
    • Nullification is literally impossible;
    • The supreme Court is the final authority on what is constitutional and what is not; and The States and The People must submit to whatever the
    supreme Court says; and
    • James Madison, Father of Our Constitution, opposed nullification.
    Their assertions contradict our Declaration of Independence, The Federalist Papers, our federal Constitution, and what James Madison, Thomas
    Jefferson, and Alexander Hamilton really said. CONTINUE  READING
~submitted by Gary Beard

----- Original Message -----
From: Teri H
To: Teri H
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2013 4:11 PM

Today a friend called to say that when his wife went down to their bank, Nashville Bank in Tenn. to renew the equity line of credit on their home she came
home and told him to go up to the bank and sign the papers. His name has never been on the loan so he went to the bank to straighten everything out.
When he got there and he was given the papers his wife had signed he found that on the bottom of every page in BOLD type it said that:


Fortunately my friend is far to savvy to have fallen for that. He threw a fit and demanded the bank explain what they thought they were trying to pull. The
loan officer called the main branch and then said, well we could take that off of there....( DUH! )
have been waiving all their rights to due process under the law and our Constitution. If the smaller banks like Nashville Bank are attempting this kind of
entrapment you can bet the BIG BANKS LED THE WAY!
If you have inadvertently signed such a document in the last three days get your butt back down to the  bank and exercise your three day right to
This is unconscionable and cannot be tolerated. If the fraudster banks can get you to renew your loans and or mortgages with language like that in the
documents they have carte blanche ability to STEAL EVERYTHING YOU HAVE and you have NO POWER TO STOP THEM AND NO RECOURSE

"A nation...cannot survive treason from within...the traitor ...wears the face of his victims,...and he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of
all men. He rots the soul of a nation—he works secretly...he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to be feared......."
Cicero, 42 B.C.E.

February 04, 2013  Henson Ong at Gun Violence Prevention Public Hearing - Hartford, CT - VIDEO
Mr. Ong is a Legal Immigrant that CHOSE to become an American.  Please watch/listen to the video (link above) and learn.  He showed up to support his
chosen country and defend the RIGHTS he has as an American citizen. We...the people that are natural born to our rights haven't a clue why they are in
place or exactly what they mean and how important they are, but those that were born in other countries completely understand and are standing to
defend them. It is time all people stand together and set aside our differences to understand what TRUE FREEDOM looks like for everyone.  The defacto
corporate system created this division and continues to do so to keep our focus off them and what they doing.  It's not working for them anymore, people
have had enough! Please
New York State Resistance
With no soundtrack - Complete 33 minute video is here - Non-Compliance Resistance Evident at Buffalo vs New York State Q & A Forum on the
Arms Bill

[This is how it is done folks, but we have to show up to the meetings in numbers.  We have the power of the people. Also, a reference is made to "brown
shirts" for those that are younger and do not know what this reference is, since so much history has been removed from textbooks, he is referring to
Hitler's Brown Shirt, NAZI POLICE FORCE.  
Former Michigan Supreme Court Justice Diane Hathaway pleads guilty to bank fraud  READ
Ronald Reagan's church put this together to commemorate the birthday of Ronald Reagan.
Boy, how far have WE slipped in just a few short years!
~submitted by DF
[My thought:  This is an excellent speech and every American should listen to it a few times, then go to the Video Resource (fifth down on page), and
watch the video of JFK's speech, contrast the two and what they are saying.  Since President Reagan, our country's values have slide into the gutter, and
corruption is at all levels for all to see and no action is taken against it, except to make laws taking the rights from the virtuous people that do not need
them.  The people can restore value to our nation by restoring Almighty God and giving His Commandments back to the people, and mainly our children.
We...the people can do it by restoring our religious values, and at the same time our de jure republic in our local communities. The people at the local
levels need to kick out the UN agenda that is being implemented by the defacto US Corporate government.  We, the people need to stand shoulder to
shoulder defending our RIGHTS, ALL OF OUR RIGHTS FOR ALL PEOPLE.  We must defend all the Rights and not just the ones that individually we are
partial to.  All our rights stand, or all our rights will most certainly fall, and they are for all people, because if all are not free, nobody is truly free<><]
To: xxxxx xxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2013 10:03 AM
Subject: ... Too Great not to Share  [this email had numerous pictures that could not be shared here due to space, and the message was to pray for our
military because of this below statement:]

    The ACLU has filed a suit to end prayer from the military completely. They're making great progress.. The Navy Chaplains
    can no longer mention Jesus' name in prayer thanks to the ACLU and others.

[The senders comment:]
It is very apparent that the ACLU is more interested in pushing an atheistic agenda instead of being truly concerned
with our rights.  Keep this prayer request moving through your email list.
~submitted by Steve

[My thought and reply: The ACLU would not be able to do this if the people in the military protested against it, until the people stop allowing this usurpation
of their rights it will continue.  Ronald Reagan said this about our First Amendment:

    "The First Amendment was not written to protect people and their laws from religious values, it was written to
    protect those values from government tyranny."   WATCH VIDEO

The "people:" are key to everything, just as the defacto is attempting another gun grab they will continue to completely remove Almighty God as well, but

We can pray for our military as most do, but ultimately it is only within their power to change it, and might I add
they take an oath to uphold the
n, but yet they are allowing their own FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHT to be taken, or someone else's of a different faith.  It is those that are directly
affected by these edicts that need to stand up and say "NO", just as it was when parents allowed prayer to be taken out of our schools, now look at the
mess they are in, they can't learn the Ten Commandments but they can learn how to properly apply a condom, such disgrace to our country, and the
education of our children.<><]

February 01, 2013   A Letter From The SPECIAL FORCES COMMUNITY Concerning The Second Amendment
Excerpt from the letter:
    “The purpose of the Second Amendment is to secure our ability to oppose enemies foreign and domestic, a guarantee against disorder and
    tyranny. Consider the words of Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story”: ‘The importance of this article will scarcely be doubted by any persons, who
    have duly reflected upon the subject. The militia is the natural defense of a free country against sudden foreign invasions, domestic insurrections,
    and domestic usurpations of power by rulers. It is against sound policy for a free people to keep up large military establishments and standing
    armies in time of peace, both from the enormous expenses, with which they are attended, and the facile means, which they afford to ambitious and
    unprincipled rulers, to subvert the government, or trample upon the rights of the people. The right of the citizens to keep and bear arms has justly
    been considered, as the palladium of the liberties of a republic; since it offers a strong moral check against the usurpation and arbitrary power of
    rulers; and will generally, even if these are successful in the first instance, enable the people to resist and triumph over them."  
Further down it reads:
    "So, what do we believe will be effective? First, it is important that we recognize that this is not a gun control problem; it is a complex sociological
    problem. No single course of action will solve the problem. Therefore, it is our recommendation that a series of diverse steps be undertaken, the
    implementation of which will require patience and diligence to realize an effect. These are as follows:

    1. First and foremost we support our Second Amendment right in that “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the
    right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed”.

    2. We support State and Local School Boards in their efforts to establish security protocols in whatever manner and form that they deem necessary
    and adequate. One of the great strengths of our Republic is that State and Local governments can be creative in solving problems. Things that work
    can be shared. Our point is that no one knows what will work and there is no one single solution, so let’s allow the State and Local governments with
    the input of the citizens to make the decisions. Most recently the Cleburne Independent School District will become the first district in North Texas to
    consider allowing some teachers to carry concealed guns. We do not opine as to the appropriateness of this decision, but we do support their right
    to make this decision for themselves.

    3. We recommend that Assisted Outpatient Treatment (AOT) laws be passed in every State. AOT is formerly known as Involuntary Outpatient
    Commitment (IOC) and allows the courts to order certain individuals with mental disorders to comply with treatment while living in the community. In
    each of the mass shooting incidents the perpetrator was mentally unstable. We also believe that people who have been adjudicated as incompetent
    should be simultaneously examined to determine whether they should be allowed the right to retain/purchase firearms.

    4. We support the return of firearm safety programs to schools along the lines of the successful “Eddie the Eagle” program, which can be taught in
    schools by Peace Officers or other trained professionals.

    5. Recent social psychology research clearly indicates that there is a direct relationship between gratuitously violent movies/video games and
    desensitization to real violence and increased aggressive behavior particularly in children and young adults (See Nicholas L. Carnagey, et al. 2007.
    “The effect of video game violence on physiological desensitization to real-life violence” and the references therein. Journal of Experimental Social
    Psychology 43:489-496). Therefore, we strongly recommend that gratuitous violence in movies and video games be discouraged. War and war-like
    behavior should not be glorified. Hollywood and video game producers are exploiting something they know nothing about. General Sherman
    famously said “War is Hell!” Leave war to the Professionals. War is not a game and should not be “sold” as entertainment to our children.

    6. We support repeal of the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990. This may sound counter-intuitive, but it obviously isn’t working. It is our opinion
    that “Gun-Free Zones” anywhere are too tempting of an environment for the mentally disturbed individual to inflict their brand of horror with little fear
    of interference. While governmental and non-governmental organizations, businesses, and individuals should be free to implement a Gun-Free
    Zone if they so choose, they should also assume Tort liability for that decision.

    7. We believe that border states should take responsibility for implementation of border control laws to prevent illegal shipments of firearms and
    drugs. Drugs have been illegal in this country for a long, long time yet the Federal Government manages to seize only an estimated 10% of this
    contraband at our borders. Given this dismal performance record that is misguided and inept (“Fast and Furious”), we believe that border States will
    be far more competent at this mission.

    8. This is our country, these are our rights. We believe that it is time that we take personal responsibility for our choices and actions rather than
    abdicate that responsibility to someone else under the illusion that we have done something that will make us all safer. We have a responsibility to
    stand by our principles and act in accordance with them. Our children are watching and they will follow the example we set.

    The undersigned Quiet Professionals hereby humbly stand ever present, ever ready, and ever vigilant.
    1100 Green Berets Signed this Letter
    We have a list of all their names and unlike any MSM outlets we can confirm that over 1100 Green Berets did sign. The list includes Special Forces
    Major Generals & Special Forces Command Sergeants Major down to the lowest ranking “Green Beret”. [Read Entire Letter Here: LINK  PDF]
~submitted by Cathy C
Who is Our Sheriff Working For?
When a society allows its political leaders to pass unjust laws the people suffer. When only just laws are enforced, the people's lives, liberty and property
are respected. In a where just laws prevail the result is peace, prosperity and freedom.
In a society that embraces only just laws the court system promotes equal justice, but when unjust laws are passed and enforced injustice prevails and the
Courts destroy the justice they were created to provide..When unjust laws become commonplace the government becomes the usurper of power and
begins to extend special benefits and privileges to certain groups and individuals at the expense others.
Any law that violates the principles spelled out in the Constitution are unjust. The Sheriffs have been elected to protect our rights and were to be the
guardians of our liberty and the defender of our Constitution. It was stated years ago that it is sometimes necessary for a patriot to defend his country from
his government. The Constitution was written to control the government not to control the people.
A County Sheriff must decide whether he or she will honor their oath or be an administrative assistant to the President of the United States. The Sheriff
can not serve two masters. He must take his marching orders from the people or the President.. It is up to us to elect righteous men or women to serve as
our County Sheriff.
As a resident of the county, we have a right to know if our Sheriff had their fingers crossed when they promised to uphold the Constitution. We need to
contact every single County Sheriff in the land and find out who they are working for.
~submitted by WRAM

n of the U.S. as well as our State of Michigan . I was wondering if you were going to join these Sheriffs listed in the media below, from around the Country
that have stated such? One Un-Constitutional mandate by the Federal Government in D.C. will be to ban our Right to Keep and Bear Arms for example.
Specifically, "assault rifles" which is a bogus label designed to create fear, when we know that any semi-auto rifle would qualify as an "assault rifle" in
operation. You and I know the legislation will include many, many firearms that are not even remotely considered "assault rifles" as we have seen them do
in the past. I ask that you gentlemen make a statement to the Citizens of Charlevoix County and to the folks passing Un-Constitutional laws in D.C. that you
too will not be letting them enforce Unlawful laws against the Citizens of your County that you have sworn to protect and serve and that pay you for that
elected duty. I also encourage you to belong to CSPOA  Please
write me back with your views on this matter as I would hate to be one of many Citizens in other counties of the U.S. where their Sheriffs have sided with
violating their Sworn Oath of Office and kowtowing to Un-Constitutional laws. Thank you for your diligence on this matter.
xxx xxxxx
This is Charlevoix County eMail and should be used for County business only.
    From: Chuck Vondra <>
    To: xxxxxx xxxxxx
    Sent: Fri, January 25, 2013 1:42:16 PM
    Subject: RE: Does Charlevoix Co. Have Constitutional Sheriffs?
    As far as I am concerned this is real simple. We abide by the oath we have taken to uphold the constitution of this state and the United States . We
    are not federal agents and do not take direction from them. My boss is the elected Sheriff of Charlevoix County. We follow the laws that empower
    him as Sheriff.
    From: xxxxxx xxxxxx
    To: Chuck Vondra
    Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 9:46 PM
    Subject: Re: Does Charlevoix Co. Have Constitutional Sheriffs?

    Thank you for your timely response. I appreciate your answers. What or where exactly are those "laws that empower him as Sheriff"? Could I find a
    copy of those somewhere? Did you receive the booklet I left at your office awhile back, about The Constitutional Sheriff written by Ex-Sheriff Richard
    Mack? Have you had a chance to read it? What did you think of the booklet, and these enclosed links of the original e-mail I just sent? Are you
    willing to join a group like CSPOA? Thanks for your time Chuck, I appreciate it. xxx  
~submitted by DF
January 31, 2013  THE LAW
From: Cathy C
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2013 10:14 AM
To: undisclosed recipients:
Subject: The Law

That brings me to what I wish to share today on this subject. I received an article from via email
earlier today and it is so VERY important to our understanding, both of what we are doing and why our country is such a putrid pool of corruption run by
self-serving lawyers/judges today. I am going to paste the article here and interject my comments in red as I usually do. I don’t know who the original
author is or I would certainly cite credit to him or her. Instead I have included the url to the site the article originally came from…..

Click on the link posted in the above for some more education.  Taken from the site  Very informative and might I say the
"truth" will set you free.


Below are two Supreme court cases of interest, but would be ruled too old to be used in court today!!

Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 7:42 AM
~submitted by Gray Beard
[For sake of space I put the Decisions in a PDF file (link above), and to comment on the writers statement, "ruled too old to be used in court today", then
The Dick Act would be too old, and where that leave our Founding Documents?  That is the argument used by the Progressives to make "NULL AND
VOID" our Bill of Rights, and the Ten Commandments are even older, must be why they were thrown out as well, so sad! <><]

January 30, 2013  Geneva Conventions treatment of civilians, prisoners of war (POWs) and soldiers
----- Original Message -----
From: isaiah
To: undisclosed-recipients:
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 12:05 AM
Subject: Geneva Conventions treatment of civilians, prisoners of war (POWs) and soldiers

Due to the actions of the occupiers in every state of the union, we need to review the GC there has been a Declared War In and Upon Every
State in the Union, not just a police action.  War on Crime, War on Poverty, War on Terrorism, War on Drugs.

We are at the very least "Injured Casualties"...if arrested "Prisoner of War"!

The War's on Terrorism around the globe are not declared, a bypass of the GC Treaties is accomplished!

Only on the North America can we resoundingly say a War of some sorts is in a Theater of War Actions that you reside in!
Geneva Conventions in overview
    The Geneva Conventions are a series of treaties on the treatment of civilians, prisoners of war (POWs) and soldiers who are otherwise
    rendered hors de combat, or incapable of fighting. The first Convention was initiated by the International Committee for Relief to the
    Wounded (which became the International Committee for the Red Cross and Red Crescent). This convention produced a treaty designed to
    protect wounded and sick soldiers during wartime. The Swiss Government agreed to hold the Conventions in Geneva, and a few years later,
    a similar agreement to protect shipwrecked soldiers was produced. In 1949, after World War II, two new Conventions were added to the
    original two, and all four were ratified by a number of countries. The 1949 versions of the Conventions, along with two additional Protocols,
    are in force today.

    Convention I: This Convention protects wounded and infirm soldiers and medical personnel against attack, execution without judgment,
    torture, and assaults upon personal dignity (Article 3). It also grants them the right to proper medical treatment and care.

    Convention II: This agreement extended the protections mentioned in the first Convention to shipwrecked soldiers and other naval forces,
    including special protections afforded to hospital ships.

    Convention III: One of the treaties created during the 1949 Convention, this defined what a Prisoner of War was, and accorded them proper
    and humane treatment as specified by the first Convention. Specifically, it required POWs to give only their name, rank, and serial number to
    their captors. Nations party to the Convention may not use torture to extract information from POWs.

    Convention IV: Under this Convention, civilians are afforded the protections from inhumane treatment and attack afforded in the first
    Convention to sick and wounded soldiers. Furthermore, additional regulations regarding the treatment of civilians were introduced.
    Specifically, it prohibits attacks on civilian hospitals, medical transports, etc. It also specifies the right of internees, and those who commit acts
    of sabotage. Finally, it discusses how occupiers are to treat an occupied populace.

    Protocol I: In this additional Protocol to the Geneva Conventions, the signing Nations agreed to further restrictions on the treatment of
    "protected persons" according to the original Conventions. Furthermore, clarification of the terms used in the Conventions was introduced.
    Finally, new rules regarding the treatment of the deceased, cultural artifacts, and dangerous targets (such as dams and nuclear installations)
    were produced.

    Protocol II: In this Protocol, the fundamentals of "humane treatment" were further clarified. Additionally, the rights of interned persons were
    specifically enumerated, providing protections for those charged with crimes during wartime. It also identified new protections and rights of
    civilian populations.
    •        The United States has ratified the four Conventions of 1949, but has not ratified the two additional Protocols of 1977.
    •        Disputes arising under the Conventions or the Protocols additional to them are settled by courts of the member nations (Article 49 of
    Convention I) or by international tribunals.
    •        The International Committee of the Red Cross and Red Crescent has a special role given by the Geneva Conventions, whereby it
    handles, and is granted access to, the wounded, sick, and POWs.
~submitted by Gray Beard

[My thought: Please pay attention to this statement from above: "there has been a Declared War In and Upon Every State in the union, not just a police
action.  War on Crime, War on Poverty, War on Terrorism, War on Drugs".   Now, read the definition of War from the 1828 dictionary:

    1828 Definition WAR, n. [G., to perplex, embroil, disturb. The primary sense of the root is to strive, struggle, urge, drive, or to turn, to twist.]

    1. A contest between nations or states, carried on by force, either for defense, or for revenging insults and redressing wrongs, for the
    extension of commerce or acquisition of territory, or for obtaining and establishing the superiority and dominion of one over the other. These
    objects are accomplished by the slaughter or capture of troops, and the capture and destruction of ships, towns and property. Among rude
    nations, war is often waged and carried on for plunder. As war is the contest of nations or states, it always implies that such contest is
    authorized by the monarch or the sovereign power of the nation. When war is commenced by attacking a nation in peace, it si called an
    offensive war, and such attack is aggressive. When war is undertaken to repel invasion or the attacks of an enemy, it is called defensive, and
    a defensive war is considered as justifiable. Very few of the wars that have desolated nations and deluged the earth with blood, have been
    justifiable. Happy would it be for mankind, if the prevalence of Christian principles might ultimately extinguish the spirit of war, and if the
    ambition to be great, might yield to the ambition of being good.[emphasis added<><]

Please take a moment to reflect on what was said above, compare it to the definition of WAR, then in truth look at what is happening across America; and
the turmoil it is in. Poverty, Crime, Terrorism, and Drugs are increasing expotentially even in our rural communities due to the policies coming from the US
CORPORATION, aka, DEFACTO US GOVERNMENT, which is a  SUBSIDIARY of the UNITED NATIONS,  which openly and publicly declared WAR on the
people of America.  Their war on crime, poverty, terrorism, and drugs are actually responsible for escalating these social ills to a critical degree of chaos
and hardship for the American people, all the while taking more and more of our liberties under the guise of fighting these wars to protect the people.  
We...the people do NOT need their kind of protection. These are wars the people did not ask for, and wars that have been going on for years to plunder
our nation of its wealth and to remove the RIGHTS OF THE PEOPLE. These internal wars are what is destroying freedom and liberty for the people in
order to give CORPORATIONS total control of wealth and power over the people.  These are wars that will NEVER END because they (CORPORATE
DEFACTO GOVERNMENT AKA US/UN) are the most guilty of them all, its called "job security.". Look around, we are a WAR TORN COUNTRY!

SOLUTION:  Yes, there is a solution, but it has to come from the people.  We as the American people need to flood our council, school board,
commissioner meetings. We need to audit the books of every public office and start writing new "By-Laws" in our Townships, cities, and counties.  We
need to peaceably declare war on the defacto corporation according to our Bill of Rights, Constitution, and Declaration of Independence, that gives us the
right to dotso. It is time for the people to stand together and perform our CIVIC DUTY.  To reinstate the balance of powers that is in the hands of the
people, we know what is taking place is wrong, we know the corruption is everywhere and we know we are being RULED by CORPORATE EDICTS that
have replaced our de jure republic common law, so why do we continue to look the other way?  <><]

January 28, 2013      Freedom, Life, Liberty  - TREASON FROM THE BENCH
From: Freedom Warrior PAG
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2013 1:04 AM
To: dejure
Subject: Freedom, Life, Liberty

Hi Bonnie,

I strongly urge you to listen to this audio recording describing how all these judges are committing treason from the bench.
Also describing how the Constitutional sheriff's are the only lawful militia law enforcement authorized to serve and protect the People, especially from a
tyrannical government such as this one.
It also teaches how all presidential "executive orders" and legislation do not apply to the People, but only apply to the administration (government
employees) within the 10 square miles of the corporate "UNITED STATES" and all its subcorporations. It shows all the laws that prove it!
Please get this out to all the sheriff's on the list as well as every American! It is important they educate themselves regarding our god-given NATURAL
rights as they apply to the People.
The government has no authority or jurisdiction over the masters; We the People
Here is the link:


Please pass it on and encourage the People, Sheriff's and others to educate themselves.

-Freedom Warrior
  -  When they play Taps, do you know the words?


When I  was young I learned how to play a trumpet.  My grandfather was a
former member of the Army Band and taught me how to  play Taps and the words
I forgot most of the words.   This is interesting to know.   The final
salute to fallen soldiers.   A terrific story of its beginning.
~Cathy C

January 27, 2013    Does Charlevoix Co. Have Constitutional Sheriffs?
From: xxx xxxxxx
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 12:03 AM
To: Don Schneider
Cc: Chuck Vondra
Subject: Does Charlevoix Co. Have Constitutional Sheriffs?

Dear Sirs,
There is a tremendous amount of Oath violating of the Constitution of the United States going on today by politicians in Washington D.C.  My
understanding is that you gentlemen took an Oath to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the U.S. as well as our State of Michigan . I was
wondering if you were going to join these Sheriffs listed in the media below, from around the Country that have stated such? One Un-Constitutional
mandate by the Federal Government in D.C. will be to ban our Right to Keep and Bear Arms for example. Specifically, "assault rifles" which is a bogus
label designed to create fear, when we know that any semi-auto rifle would qualify as an "assault rifle" in operation. You and I know the legislation will
include many, many firearms that are not even remotely considered "assault rifles" as we have seen them do in the past. I ask that you gentlemen make a
statement to the Citizens of Charlevoix County and to the folks passing Un-Constitutional laws in D.C. that you too will not be letting them enforce Unlawful
laws against the Citizens of your County that you have sworn to protect and serve and that pay you for that elected duty. I also encourage you to belong
to CSPOA  Please write me back with your views on this matter
as I would hate to be one of many Citizens in other counties of the U.S. where their Sheriffs have sided with violating their Sworn Oath of Office and
kowtowing to Un-Constitutional laws. Thank you for your diligence on this matter.
xxx xxxxx
This is Charlevoix County eMail and should be used for County business only.
    From: Chuck Vondra <>
    To: xxxxxx xxxxxx
    Sent: Fri, January 25, 2013 1:42:16 PM
    Subject: RE: Does Charlevoix Co. Have Constitutional Sheriffs?
    As far as I am concerned this is real simple. We abide by the oath we have taken to uphold the constitution of this state and the United States . We
    are not federal agents and do not take direction from them. My boss is the elected Sheriff of Charlevoix County. We follow the laws that empower
    him as Sheriff.
    From: xxxxxx xxxxxx
    To: Chuck Vondra
    Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 9:46 PM
    Subject: Re: Does Charlevoix Co. Have Constitutional Sheriffs?

    Thank you for your timely response. I appreciate your answers. What or where exactly are those "laws that empower him as Sheriff"? Could I find a
    copy of those somewhere? Did you receive the booklet I left at your office awhile back, about The Constitutional Sheriff written by Ex-Sheriff Richard
    Mack? Have you had a chance to read it? What did you think of the booklet, and these enclosed links of the original e-mail I just sent? Are you
    willing to join a group like CSPOA? Thanks for your time Chuck, I appreciate it. xxx  
~submitted by DF

January 25, 2013   Massachusetts State House Firearms Rally 1/19/2013 - Amazing Chinese-American Perspective
Excellent Speech!
Published on Jan 20, 2013
January 19th, 2013
This gentleman was kind enough to share his perspective on the second amendment and its importance in keeping us a free society. His perspective is
like no other, as he has seen first hand the powerful fist of tyranny when allowed to act with impunity.
~submitted by Richard B

With all the protesting taking place across this nation I hope many will participate on February 8th in Lansing at the capital building.  Also, we need to
flood the phone lines and email boxes of all those that are in office to serve the people, and remind them of this.  If we don't like what is happening within
this country then WE must all stand together to correct it.  If we do not defend our Bill of Rights, then our Constitution and Declaration of Independence
will be made "null and void", think long and hard what that will mean.  

There is blatant evidence of the defacto corporate (fed) governments intentions just by the "trampling" they have already done to our rights, and we've
said nothing.  The new buzz phrase they are using to program the people through mind control is "Gun Violence", do NOT fall for this.  It is "PEOPLE
VIOLENCE" and this is what needs to consistently be brought to the forefront.  And this PEOPLE VIOLENCE is from their immorality and corruption that
spread across our land.  Switzerland has the lowest crime rate in the world, WHY?  BECAUSE THE WISE GOVERNMENT OF SWITZERLAND REQUIRES
We cannot continue to target crime by making more laws for those that do not break the law...this is insane!  The defacto Corporate DC government is
insane, they keep doing the same thing over and over expecting different results, or do they really expect different results?  Perhaps all of the politicians
should be declared "mentally incompetent to serve" and relieved from duty by the people.  If we do not return COMMON SENSE from ABSOLUTE TRUTHS
to this country, well, God have mercy on us all, for we truly are a wretched lot and we'll be deserving of the most certain consequences of our choices.  

We must be mindful of the words they use and why they are using them, and alert others.  It is programming, brainwashing or mind control, whatever you
want to call it and it started with "political correctness".  That was when we lost our First Amendment Right and we didn't even realize it.  Will we also give
them our Second Amendment Right as well?  It is so simple, the people just have to stand up and tell them, "NO INFRINGING ON THE SECOND
AMENDMENT IN ANY FORM FOR NO REASON".  Do not fall for their words of "caring" because if they did care they'd stop giving the delusion of doing
something by taking more rights away from the law abiding citizens. They'd restore common law and actually seek justice for the victims of criminal actions,
no matter the political position or wealth of the perpetrator.  This would be 'caring' about the people they are in office to serve.

Even if you don't own guns, you should be very thankful that others do to protect you.  You've heard of "home invasion" correct? If you haven't, here is a
quick lesson, a home invader comes into your home "WHILE YOU ARE HOME", unlike the burglar's of yesteryear that waited until nobody was home. A
home invader will come into your home and terrorize your family and do what they will to you and your children according to their own desires, and they
stay as long as they want. Not having a gun in the house gives them complete power over you, now if your neighbor has a gun and realizes something
isn't right, well, he could come to the protection of your family.  This is also why it is so important to develop relationships with your neighbors.  Home
VIDEO with a good ending because of a gun. You see mainstream media does not report ALL the lives that are saved because of armed citizens,
the truth would not fit well with their UN agenda to ban guns in America.

This is merely another political power grab, but it is the most serious for all Americans; remember the science lesson about the frog in water, this attempt
to infringe on our Second Amendment  right in any way is the boiling point.  Get everyone you know to make the calls to Lansing and give them a
"directive" to defend "We..the people" of Michigan and our SECOND AMENDMENT RIGHT, UNINFRINGED UPON PERIOD.  The FREE states have the
authority to stop the power grabs of the UN controlled US Federal Corporation government, and the free state is its "people".  It's our TENTH
AMENDMENT.  Sheriff Mack says, "the sheriff is the highest governmental authority in his county. Within that jurisdiction – inside his county – the sheriff
has more power than the governor of his state. Indeed, the sheriff has more power in his county than the President of the United States. In his county, he
can overrule the President and kick his people out. Remember, the President has few and limited powers." We are in the eleventh hour, it is time for all to
find out exactly who the sheriff  is in our counties and "recall" them if they are not going to do honor their constitutional oath to defend and protect the
rights of the people in their county. <><

January 24, 2013   My Personal Pledge of Resistance Against Any Attempt to Disarm Us by Means of an "Assault Weapons Ban"

From: xxxxx
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 10:42 AM
To: Senator Debbie Stabenow
Subject: Re: My Personal Pledge of Resistance Against Any Attempt to Disarm Us by Means of an "Assault Weapons Ban"

Us senator from Michigan  Debbie Stabenow,    [this email is a response to the letter received from the Senator, below]
It has nothing to do with hunting you are in fact trying to dis arm the wrong people. You have to dis arm the criminals and the government morons that go
around doing these horrendous acts to further government agenda's.
If you don't want we the people armed you must first disarm the criminals and the cabal in Washington District of Criminals.
Your mentor Adolf Hitler proved gun control doesn’t work. We see that some of your people are now infiltrating the public schools see article below and
put a stop to it and lift their tax status.  We know they have a 501 c3 tax status.

""Tell the Truth and Shame the Southern Poverty Law Center
The homosexual activist group, Southern Poverty Law Center, has attempted to infiltrate the public school system with their newly designed entry-level
“diversity” program called “Mix It Up” day. The goal of “Mix It Up” day is to force the acceptance of homosexuality into public schools – even at elementary
and junior high levels. They listed schools on their website that were “participants” of “Mix It Up” day. However, the SPLC was.......
by Bradlee Dean""
bcc to list circulate far and wide

On 01/23/2013 06:07 PM, Senator Debbie Stabenow wrote:  
~submitted by Gray Beard

January 23, 2013  Letter from Sheriff Tim Mueller to VP Biden - Perhaps this should be printed and sent to all Sheriffs in Michigan
Sheriff Tim Mueller is defending the citizens of Linn County Oregon against the unconstitutional laws that DC is proposing against our Second Amendment
Right.  He is giving notice to Mr. Biden that he will not enforce the laws in his county.  View LETTER
~submitted by Gray Beard
The idea of suspending the Constitution was first presented in the mid 1980s during the Reagan administration.   No less a thug than the drug-dealing,
murder-ordering, terrorist-supporting Oliver North was knee deep in the program.   Since then every US president - George Bush Sr, Bill Clinton, George
Bush Jr, and Barack Obama - have steadily created oppressive laws and legal systems to "fight terrorism" while simultaneously violating basic
Constitutional rights.   Simultaneously with this, the US military has received training on how to suppress the rights of and even attack US citizens on US
soil. US police have been increasingly militarized and new armed federal agencies have spouted like weeds.   Why?   Doesn't the US have enough serious
problems to attend to without the need to laboriously create new "programs" to fight non-existent or government manufactured problems?   Instead the
ONLY thing the US government has done consistently over the last 30 years (besides wage illegal wars and give Wall Street criminals a "get out of jail
free" card) is create new secret "internal security" laws, bureaucracies, infrastructure and armed bodies.

["Internal Security" perhaps for their own protection from those that are learning the truth about what they've been doing for the past 30 years, please watch this short
footage that comes from their own words
The link above will provide some UCC information that might be useful for those that are seeking personal remedy from the admiralty "fictional system".  
Our de jure republic is completely separate from UCC, which is the defacto system of commerce.  We use it because it is the only system to conduct
business with when FRN's are involved.  Our De Jure Republic is of, by, and for the people, and Constitutionally is separate from the defacto system.  It is
about freedom NOT COMMERCE, and it is for ALL NATURAL BORN PEOPLE OF AMERICA, not just Secured Party Creditors seeking remedy using the
UCC System.
Grinding America Down (Full Movie) FREE to watch for a limited time on Vimeo

January 21, 2013
Proposed Michigan Law Would Protect Gun Owners  - Pistol sales and permit records would not be subject to FOIA
By TOM GANTERT | Jan. 19, 2013 |
    Michigan's handgun owners could get an extra layer of privacy protection if a newly introduced Senate bill is passed and signed into law.
    Senate Bill 49 was introduced by Sen. Tom Casperson, R-Escanaba, and would keep state databases containing information on issued licenses
    private. It also would keep them from being subject to the Freedom of Information Act.
    Concealed pistol licenses in Michigan already are protected as private information under state law. However, pistol sales records and pistol sales
    permits are now protected only by case law, said Ryan Mitchell, a legislative staffer who researched the law for Sen. Mike Green’s office. It was
    ruled in the 1999 Michigan Supreme Court Case, Mager vs. the Michigan State Police, that pistol sales records and pistol sales permits were private
    information, but no law specifically says that.
    The Supreme Court ruling only gives the state police the option to deny FOIA requests, and doesn’t mandate it, said Patrick Wright, senior legal
    analyst for the Mackinac Center for Public Policy. Wright said if the state police wanted to, they could release the information.
    The state Supreme Court has the final authority but it would have a hard time justifying overturning the state law, Wright said.
    Language in the proposed bill states the information is confidential and "shall not be disclosed."
    “This really makes these protections concrete and sets them in stone." Mitchell said. "You don't want to be broadcasting to criminals the location of
    legally-owned firearms."
    Steven Dulan, a Lansing attorney and member of the NRA and the Michigan Coalition for Responsible Gun Owners applauded the bill.
    "This is a useful step from protecting Michigan gun owners from abuses similar to what happened in New York," Dulan said, adding that people who
    don't own guns also benefit from gun ownership being kept confidential because it forces "predators to think twice before breaking into anyone's
    Dulan was referring to the national furor created when The Journal Newsnewspaper in New York published the names and addresses of gun permit
    holders in their circulation area and included an online map showing the location of the homes of the gun owners.
    Since then, at least one person blames the map for his home being burglarized and there are reports that prisoners have told guards that they
    know where they live thanks to the newspaper. The state of New York legislature passed a law that allows gun owners a way to keep that
    information private.
    Mackinac Center legislative analyst Jack McHugh said the controversy generated by the newspaper publishing the names could make Senate Bill
    49 one of the first Public Acts passed in 2013.
    "The stars are aligned for this bill," McHugh said.
~submitted by Cathy C

    John Maynard Keynes: "If governments should refrain from regulation ... the worthlessness of the money becomes apparent and the fraud
    upon the public can be concealed no longer." [Perhaps, just perhaps, this is what they are attempting to conceal]

    Founding Father James Madison
    "The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the Federal Government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State
    Governments are numerous and indefinite. The former will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace negotiation, and
    foreign commerce;…The powers reserved to the several states will extend to all the objects, which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern
    the lives, liberties and properties of the people, and the internal order, improvement, and prosperity of the state." Federalist Papers No. 45  

    "Liberty has never come from the government. Liberty has always come from the subjects of government. The history of liberty is the history
    of resistance. The history of liberty is a history of the limitation of governmental power, not the increase of it." ~Woodrow Wilson

    The second amendment states: "A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and
    bear arms shall not be infringed."

    "The right of the people to keep and bear...arms shall not be infringed. A well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained
    to arms, is the best and most natural defense of a free country..." ~James Madison

    "I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials." (George Mason) Debates and other Proceedings of the
    Convention of Virginia,...taken in shorthand by David Robertson of Petersburg, at 271, 275 (2d ed. Richmond, 1805).

    "What, Sir, is the use of a militia? It is to prevent the establishment of a standing army, the bane of liberty. ... Whenever Governments mean
    to invade the rights and liberties of the people, they always attempt to destroy the militia, in order to raise an army upon their ruins." (Rep.
    Elbridge Gerry of Massachusetts, spoken during floor debate over the Second Amendment)

    "Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom of Europe. The supreme power in
    America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any
    bands of regular troops that can be, on any pretense, raised in the United States" (Noah Webster in a pamphlet aimed at swaying
    Pennsylvania toward ratification) Noah Webster, "An Examination into the Leading Principals of the Federal Constitution...", in Paul Ford, ed.,
    Pamphlets on the Constitution of the United States, at 56(New York, 1888).
    More Quotes

Whatever your personal feelings are on this issue, this really has nothing to do with guns.  Guns are just a tool being used.

    This is an agenda that is being forced upon the American public contrary to anything that our forefathers envisioned.  
    It is very important for you to follow the links in this article to get the sense of the underlying agenda.  The worst part is
    that the "powers to be" will not stop at anything to push their agenda.

    It has been so long forgotten as to who really they are accountable to. Article Link

    "If you are willing to sell your freedom for short term financial security, real or perceived, the willingness to sell your very soul can’t be far behind."    ~Joe Bannister
    "When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either quit being mistaken, or cease to be honest." Unknown
    "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote!" ~Benjamin Franklin
~submitted by Steve

    Excerpts from speech:
    "Mr. President, it is natural to man to indulge in the illusions of hope. We are apt to shut our eyes against a painful truth, and listen to the
    song of that siren, till she transforms us into beasts. Is this the part of wise men, engaged in a great and arduous struggle for liberty? Are we
    disposed to be of the number of those, who, having eyes, see not, and having ears, hear not, the things which so nearly concern their
    temporal salvation? For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost, I am willing to know the whole truth; to know the worst, and to provide
    for it."  

    "Sir, we have done everything that could be done, to avert the storm which is now coming on. We have petitioned; we have remonstrated; we
    have supplicated; we have prostrated ourselves before the throne [US Federal/Corporate Government], and have implored its interposition to
    arrest the tyrannical hands of the ministry [US President] and Parliament [US Congress]. Our petitions have been slighted; our
    remonstrances have produced additional violence and insult; our supplications have been disregarded, and we have been spurned, with
    contempt, from the foot of the throne [US Federal/Corporate Government!"

    "The war is actually begun! The next gale that sweeps from the north [UN/DC] will bring to our ears the clash of resounding arms! 4 Our
    brethren are already in the field! Why stand we here idle? What is it that gentlemen wish? What would they have? Is life so dear, or peace so
    sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me,
    give me liberty or give me death!"   READ COMPLETE SPEECH

    1828 Definition LIB'ERTY, n. [L. libertas, from liber, free.]

    1. Freedom from restraint, in a general sense, and applicable to the body, or to the will or mind. The body is at liberty, when not confined; the will or
    mind is at liberty, when not checked or controlled. A man enjoys liberty, when no physical force operates to restrain his actions or volitions.

    2. Natural liberty, consists in the power of acting as one thinks fit, without any restraint or control, except from the laws of nature. It is a state of
    exemption from the control of others, and from positive laws and the institutions of social life. This liberty is abridged by the establishment of

    3. Civil liberty, is the liberty of men in a state of society, or natural liberty, so far only abridged and restrained, as is necessary and expedient for the
    safety and interest of the society, state or nation. A restraint of natural liberty, not necessary or expedient for the public, is tyranny or oppression.
    civil liberty is an exemption from the arbitrary will of others, which exemption is secured by established laws, which restrain every man from injuring
    or controlling another. Hence the restraints of law are essential to civil liberty.

    The liberty of one depends not so much on the removal of all restraint from him, as on the due restraint upon the liberty of others.

    In this sentence, the latter word liberty denotes natural liberty.

    4. Political liberty, is sometimes used as synonymous with civil liberty. But it more properly designates the liberty of a nation, the freedom of a nation
    or state from all unjust abridgment of its rights and independence by another nation. Hence we often speak of the political liberties of Europe, or the
    nations of Europe.

    5. Religious liberty, is the free right of adopting and enjoying opinions on religious subjects, and of worshiping the Supreme Being according to the
    dictates of conscience, without external control.

    6. Liberty, in metaphysics, as opposed to necessity, is the power of an agent to do or forbear any particular action, according to the determination
    or thought of the mind, by which either is preferred to the other.

    Freedom of the will; exemption from compulsion or restraint in willing or volition.

    7. Privilege; exemption; immunity enjoyed by prescription or by grant; with a plural. Thus we speak of the liberties of the commercial cities of Europe.

    8. Leave; permission granted. The witness obtained liberty to leave the court.

    9. A space in which one is permitted to pass without restraint, and beyond which he may not lawfully pass; with a plural; as the liberties of a prison.

    10. Freedom of action or speech beyond the ordinary bounds of civility or decorum. Females should repel all improper liberties.

    To take the liberty to do or say any thing, to use freedom not specially granted.

    To set at liberty, to deliver from confinement; to release from restraint.

    To be at liberty, to be free from restraint.

    Liberty of the press, is freedom from any restriction on the power to publish books; the free power of publishing what one pleases, subject only to
    punishment for abusing the privilege, or publishing what is mischievous to the public or injurious to individuals.

    1828 Definition PAT'RIOTISM ,n. Love of one's country; the passion which aims to serve one's country, either in defending it from invasion, or
    protecting its rights and maintaining its laws and institutions in vigor and purity. Patriotism is the characteristic of a good citizen, the noblest passion
    that animates a man in the character of a citizen

January 18, 2013   GUN OWNERS OF AMERICA

    From: isaiah
    Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 5:49 AM
    To: McSawyer
    Subject: : Obama Goes Nuts and Offers Anti-gunners Wish List

    The background check is voluntary and up to the dealer to decide to do it!! The catch is  if the dealer does not do the back ground check  he
    is adding himself to a possible liability.
    Where would the government get the funds to do any of this when they are broke now?  If the people would have Rallied in Washington
    DISTRICT OF  CRIMINALS as was requested  on 1/7/2013 and abolished
    this rogue government None of this would be a problem at all! It is time folks to come and stand together and take this country back.
             -----Forwarded Message-----
    From: Gun Owners of America
    Sent: Jan 18, 2013 12:38 AM
    To: Curtis  
    Subject: Obama Goes Nuts and Offers Anti-gunners Wish List  ARTICLE
~ submitted by Gray Beard   
My thought:

January 16, 2013  El Paso County Board of Commissioners Takes a Stand

    Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 9:35 AM
    Subject: El Paso County Board of Commissioners Takes a Stand
    El Paso County in Colorado has unanimously passed a resolution that in El Paso County the legislation known as NDAA will not be enforced.
    The Board has taken this action in order to keep the oath that they took to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution against all enemies
    both foreign and domestic. They collectively see this legislation as being a flagrant violation of the Constitution.
    Please share this link with the members of your City Council as well as the members of your County's Board of Supervisors.
    El Paso County's Board of County Commissioners Nullify NDAA  READ MORE
~submitted by Cathy C

My thought:  Good for El Paso at least the people are aware there is a problem, but unfortunately this single act is not going to fix the core problem, it is
treating one of the symptoms, does this mean to not do it, absolutely NOT!  What I'm saying is the defacto congress are giving a token to the people to
appease them, but meanwhile the TSA, HLS and the Patriot Act still exist.  So, it is another movement forward in their agenda with only a very small step
backward towards their goal.

Please, please discern truth, and look at FREEDOM from the eagle's perspective.  He soars high and can see for miles, his ability to see ALL enables him
to find what he needs for survival.  Approach life in the same way, rise above the moment of urgency and constant confusion that is created and look
further back in time to the original seed of destruction, then bring that forward to our country and when it was planted to grow into what we have today.  
This sounds cryptic but it is only for those seeking real solutions  anchored in truth. Taking action based on truth is where our freedom lies, and many
people believe they know the truth, and perhaps they do, but usually it is a very small piece surrounded in much deception, but the micro bit of truth is the
focus to the exclusion of all the deception it is wrapped in.  To heal our land we need to restore the corner stone, the foundation  that all truth originates,
all else is "busy work", vain and empty, sprouting nothing of real substance .  

Creating state legislation to make null and void the "Emergency War Powers Act of 1933, and all E.O. forward from that point would be more effective to
bind the far-reaching arm of the "police state", and/or at the very least, make null and void the Patriot Act, NDAA, and Obamacare in the states, and any
new gun law legislation/E.O. that will be passed. Meanwhile, they continue to play the groups like a fiddle to the completion of their agenda, and there is
only one way to freedom, and it isn't by asking the government/ taskmaster if we can have our rights back, but by restoring the one true King that loves all
people.  The King that does not control, but gave us Free Will, to choose to do what is right or what is wrong, but it is our choice and not the governments
to decide. It is the governments responsibility to adhere to the BINDERS that were placed on them by the law of this land that was established by the Ten
Commandments (which were reduced to Two), our Bill of Rights and if these are not adhered to we have the Declaration of Independence for remedy.  All
we need to do is proclaim our "free will in truth", and take the "right action" to stop the destruction of our nation and restore the sanctity of  life with equal
rights for ALL people and religions.  The "majority rule, also known as Mob Rule" does not have a say in this, our De Jure Republic does not allow for
MOB RULE, this is why our founders gave us a REPUBLIC and NOT a Demon-ocracy.  Take a good long look at the war-torn countries all around the
world under the deception of "Demon-ocracy", then do the research for yourselves, and search for truth in all things. Remember this, true healing cannot
be found until one is "sick and tired" of being, sick and tired.  Equally one cannot be free until one steps out in faith to experience true freedom, it starts in
the heart. <><

January 15, 2013   Gun Control Edition

    this was sent to all my congress critters
    ------- Original Message --------
    Subject:         gun control Michigan edition
    Date:         Mon, 14 Jan 2013 22:32:35 -0500
    From:         isaiah
    To:         Senator Debbie Stabenow <>

    Michigan edition
    for Michigan's Federal Senator
    Senator Debbie Stabenow

    Not having received a response to my last letter .
    I can only hope that you are hard at work teaching yourself, and the imposter Barry Soetoro(Barrack Husaine Obam) that neither
    congress nor the president with executive orders has any Authority, Power , OR RIGHT ,To infringe on a feel good compromise on the
    Second Amendment!
    Below is a response to another person on the second Amendment that should clear the air also comments and Definitions from that
    time in history by the web master,
~submitted by Gray Beard

My note:  The above message also included all the information from the post below, dated 1/14/13 - Well Regulated Militia vs. Constitutional Militia?  For
sake of space, and redundancy I didn't add it again with this message. So, read the above message then follow with the below message for accuracy of
what was sent to congress.


    "The 2nd Amendment does not say anything about a Constitutional Militia, it states a Well Regulated Militia. This Amendment useing the term Well
    Regulated  has nothing at all to do with any government,  it in fact means that you are proficient in the use of your arms. It tells government  that
    they shall not infringe on  that right that is bestowed on us by our creator. In this country years ago we burned witches at the stake and also burned
    lawyers at the stake for practicing witchcraft. A constitutional militia will get you nowhere.  The  2nd Amendment was put in place so the people have
    a recourse against what we have in the White house today."  ~submitted by Gray Beard

    Second Amendment:
    "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."

    1828 Definition:   REG'ULATE, v.t.

    1. To adjust by rule, method or established mode; as, to regulate weights and measures; to regulate the assize of bread; to regulate our moral
    conduct by the laws of God and of society; to regulate our manners by the customary forms.  [emphasis added <><]

    2. To put in good order; as, to regulate the disordered state of a nation or its finances.[emphasis added <><]

    3. To subject to rules or restrictions; as, to regulate trade; to regulate diet.

    1913 Definition Regulate (regulate)
    v. t. (-lt)
    [imp. *** p. p. Regulated (- l&amacr]`td); p. pr. *** vb. n. Regulating.] [L. regulatus, p. p. of regulare, fr. regula. See Regular.]

    1.To adjust by rule, method, or established mode] to direct by rule or restriction; to subject to governing principles or laws.
    The laws which regulate the successions of the seasons. Macaulay.

    The herdsmen near the frontier adjudicated their own disputes, and regulated their own police. Bancroft.

    1.To put in good order; as, to regulate the disordered state of a nation or its finances.  [emphasis added <><]
    1.To adjust, or maintain, with respect to a desired rate, degree, or condition; as, to regulate the temperature of a room, the pressure of steam, the
    speed of a machine, etc.
    To regulate a watch or clock, to adjust its rate of running so that it will keep approximately standard time.

    Syn. -- To adjust; dispose; methodize; arrange; direct; order; rule; govern.

My thought:  If you read the complete Second Amendment, then follow it with the definition of "regulate" from that era it certainly does give more clarity of
what, and why this Second Amendment is included in the BILL OF RIGHTS.  Our rights do NOT come from the Bill of Rights, our rights come from Almighty
God, our Creator, could this be why they worked so hard to strip all evidence of a Creator from all public records, including what has been taught to our

Our Bill of Rights is in place to BIND the power of the government, but WE the "well regulated militia," which is the PEOPLE, have failed to do OUR DUTY!
Our De Jure REPUBLIC WAS ENTRUSTED TO THE PEOPLE, but we didn't understand that in order to keep our De Jure Republic we had to keep
Almighty God first in the equation, for it was given to us by HIM, though many would say otherwise, and our greatest mistake was, "listening to them".  

Our de jure Republic is one of "self-governance by a virtuous people", which again, could be a solid argument for the peoples militia.  Have you noticed
everything is upside down, right is wrong, and serious criminals go free while good people go to jail for defending themselves against those that would do
them harm?  We are now living in a lawless, godless death culture, but it doesn't have to be!!  It is this way because we "SAY NOTHING".  If we want true
lawful change and the bindings of our founding documents on those put in positions to SERVE AND REPRESENT US, then we need to stand UNITED AND
DEFEND THEM.  Not allow false new legislation by the same usurpers to be put in place to quiet the people under the false illusion it will "protect us", we
don't need their kind of protection, WE CAN, AND HAVE THE RIGHT TO PROTECT OURSELVES.

What we do need is to send them all home without severance pay and make things right with Almighty God first, and then return this country to its original
freedom for All PEOPLE, and the very first step to take would be to make null and void all the UCC laws and codes on the people restricting it to
commercial only, as it should be.  Restore the TEN COMMANDMENTS to our schools, we need to unwind the past 60 years of restrictive statues and
codes placed on the people to liberate us, but move forward with common sense, values, and principles based on natural/common law, release the new
energy technologies that will free us from the tyranny of power.

The Ten Commandments isn't about "religion" as many will "scoff" and accuse it of such, especially those that are among the "lawless."  Our founding
documents were/are for ALL PEOPLE AND ALL RELIGIONS.  If our founding documents are adhered to, and most importantly the TEN
COMMANDMENTS, nobody would have to fear another race or religion, or lack of.  Basic human rights would be protected and all would be free to
worship as they believe because they would not be allowed to infringe on the rights or safety of others; in fact our FREE WILL would then be protected, as
it was given to us since the beginning of time. Righteous law brings order, peace, and justice, while unrighteous law creates tyranny with no justice for

The abuses that have taken place in the past under numerous  "religions" would be a personal choice to the individual if they decided to follow a religion
that would subject them to abusive laws, but this law could not be applied to society as a whole, and there would be the freedom to leave that religion at
any time without recourse from those controlling it.  

Our founding documents would stand as they are written and all the legal interpretations of confusion could be laid to rest, permanently.  This is true
FREEDOM!  Understanding, wisdom, common sense, logic, and the two greatest commandments that sum up the law is what is needed.  We can do this if
we all search our heart for truth, and realize there is "absolute truth, but it will not be found in a godless society.  IMO to properly enforce and defend the
THEY ALL FALL, and this is what they've been doing all along, a slow erosion of our rights, had we so vigorously defended the others we'd not be at the
edge of complete tyranny as we are today, Praise God, He also gave us our Declaration of Independence, so there is remedy<><

January 13, 2013      COMMONWEALTH VS. CORPORATION - Is our de jure republic for Michigan a commonwealth or corporation, what say

READ THE FULL ARTICLE HERE  or watch VIDEO  ~submitted by Cathy C

    On Jan. 12, Sheriff Denny Peyman held a press conference & he explained that a Sheriff's supercede the powers of federal and state agents.
    Jackson County Kentucky Sheriff Denny Peyman has made it clear that gun laws which violate the United States Constitution or the Kentucky
    Constitution will not be enforced in his county. He has no intention of backing down. During the press conference, he took time to explain his powers
    as sheriff:
    I am responsible for the people inside this county. I am the highest elected official in this county, & this is the only opportunity the people have to
    speak for themselves and say 'this is what we want.'
    I can ask federal people to leave, they have to leave. I can ask state people to leave, they have to leave. & it doesn't matter what laws Obama
    passes, the sheriff has more power than the federal people.
    He said that if federal gun-grabbers don't understand this, then "they need to go back and study it," because Kentucky "is a commonwealth."
    Sheriff Denny Peyman represents everything good and brave about America, and about the great state of Kentucky. He is a patriot, first class.
    Investigate Oathkeepers. We are organizing police and military to honor their oath to the constitution. [emphasis added <><]

The County Sheriff: America's Last Hope (Paperback) by Sheriff Richard Mack   PURCHASE

    1828 Definition:    COMMONWEALTH, n.

    1. An established form of government, or civil polity; or more generally, a state; a body politic, consisting of a certain portion of men united by compact or tacit
    agreement, under one form of government and system of laws. This term is applied to the government of Great Britain, which is of a mixed character, and to other
    governments which are considered as free or popular, but rarely or improperly, to an absolute government. A commonwealth is properly a free state; a popular or
    representative government; a republic; as the commonwealth of Massachusetts. The word signifies strictly, the common good or happiness; and hence, the form of
    government supposed best to secure the public good.

    2. The whole body of people in a state the public.

    3. The territory of a state; as, all the land within the limits of the commonwealth.

My thought:  Yes, according to our founders we were/are a Commonwealth or Republic.  In the past I have purchased this book to give away to others.  
We have Sheriff Mack video's on our
video resource page, and I suggest everyone research OATHKEEPERS  and follow your heart.  Will you continue to
go along just to get along?  There are worse things than death and to live in fear is one of them! <><

    “The time is now near at hand which must probably determine, whether Americans are to be, Freemen, or Slaves; whether they are to have
    any property they can call their own; whether their Houses, and Farms, are to be pillaged and destroyed, and they consigned to a State of
    Wretchedness from which no human efforts will probably deliver them. The fate of unborn Millions will now depend, under God, on the
    Courage and Conduct of this army”
    -- Gen. George Washington, to his troops before the battle of Long Island

January 12, 2012   Grand Jury
    I would just like to say that I think we should be bringing grand jury indictments against all MI politicians who are not demanding Obama be
    tried for treason!! All this other stuff we can deal with latter. At this time we have no lawful anything, we must start holding our politicians
~submitted by David W    


    Senator Levin

    We will start off with the gun control issue.
     You are hereby put on notice that congress and the president have no authority to infringe on the peoples rights!!
     The second Amendment is very clear where it tells government you SHALL NOT INFRINGE!! THAT MEANS YOU CANNOT PASS GUN
    OF A FELONY. THAT SUPERSEDES ALL STATE AND LOCAL LAWS, With Barry Soetoro(Barrack Hussain Obamba no documentation of
    change) not being eligible to hold the office he has extorted !
    We will hold anything you pass as null in void.
    Remember that a armed society is a peaceful society.

    Tax Reform
     With the fact that anybody that can get on the internet can look up and find the facts that the IRS and Federal Reserve are not any part of
    our      government!
    The best thing you can do is abolish the so call income tax IRS and the federal reserve and replace it with nothing!!!
      Just think what a impact this will have on stimulating the economy???
      We do not need a full time congress so cut your work day and pay to help put the economy back on its feet!
                     ~submitted by Gray Beard

Wyoming To Preserve the Second Amendment

n response to current threats from the Federal Government on banning firearms, firearms accessories and ammunition, States are beginning to take
action to hold the Federal Government to its constitutional limits under the 2nd Amendment. “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a
free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”
Wyoming Rep. Kendell Kroeker has sponsored and introduced HB0104. the Firearms Protection Act. Representatives Baker, Burkhart, Jaggi, Miller,
Piiparinen, Reeder and Winters and Senators Dockstader and Hicks have co-sponsered this bill.
Wyoming’s Firearms Protection Act, is “an act relating to firearms; providing that any federal law which attempts to ban a semi-automatic firearm or to limit
the size of a magazine of a firearm or other limitation on in this state shall be unenforceable in Wyoming; providing a penalty; and providing for an
effective date.” This act nullifies all federal laws made after Jan. 1, 2013.
“We need the second amendment because it is the protection for all of our other rights. Without it, those rights have no protection,” Kroeker said.
~submitted by Cathy C

[My thought - why do we have to once again create legislation for rights we already have? Didn't the "DICK ACT" supposedly do this?  By creating more
legislation we are in essence saying our founding documents do not carry the weight of the law or our RIGHTS... They are eroding our founding
foundation and we are allowing them to do so by continuously feeling the need to legislate for more protection, ENFORCE what we already have in
place!!   Doesn't the Tenth Amendment support and defend the rights of the free states that are supposed to defend the rights of its people?  I'm not
saying this isn't good, I'm just saying, "think deeper than the surface" because to me it is yet another law and what good is it if the people will not defend
what we already have?  It is an attempt to appease the people, but by agreeing to this we are actually admitting our founding documents mean nothing!  
Such political games, no wonder the people aren't listened to anymore.  This nullifies all federal laws made after Jan 1, 2013 only, what about all the other
laws put into place such as the Patriots Act, the NDAA?  It also states we need the Second Amendment to protect our other rights, really?   We've had our
other rights and the second amendment and how has it stopped our "other rights" from being taken?   Please people, discern truth,  the way to protect
OUR RIGHTS IS TO KNOW WHAT THEY ARE AND WHERE THEY COME FROM, and it isn't from government.   When we allow one right to be diluted by
deception and misinterpretation, we opened the door to losing all our rights as we are witnessing today.  Let us not be fooled again by being deceived
with more false hopes of new legislation that will supposedly protect our rights, the TRUTH is, WE MUST PROTECT OUR RIGHTS AS THEY WERE
WRITTEN BY OUR FOUNDING FATHERS, they knew what we were up against <><]

THE LAW  by Frederic Bastiat
Posted by Keith B

The Law, by Frederic Bastiat with a forward by Walter E. Williams. (2007, Foundation for Economic Freedom; ISBN-13: 978-1-57246-214-4).
The Law is must reading for anyone who wants to understand what law ought to be. It was written by a Frenchman, Bastiat, and published around 1850,
which was quite some time ago. But this slim volume, just 77 pages with supplementary materials like its index, is not difficult to read. In a short space, it
fully explains the premises of liberty, a free society and free markets.
A lot of people skip introductions and forewards. But I urge you to read the foreward by Walter Williams. He summarizes well much of what Bastiat
explains, namely, that “the greatest single threat to liberty is government.”
The most important concept that you can get from this book is Bastiat’s explanation of legal plunder. He tells us to look at our government and its laws:
“See if the law takes from some persons what belongs to them, and gives it to other persons to whom it does not belong. See if the law benefits one citizen
at the expense of another by doing what the citizen himself cannot do without committing a crime.”
As Williams notes, “with such an accurate description of legalized plunder, we cannot deny that most government activities, . . . are legalized plunder, or
for the sake of modernity, legalized theft.” So right he is.
Bastiat sums up the proper role of law in this way:
“The law is the organization of the natural right of self defense. It is the substitution of common force for individual forces. And this common force is to do
only what the individual forces have a natural and lawful right to do: to protect persons, liberties and properties; to maintain the right of each, and to
cause justice to reign over us all.” In other words, the law’s “mission is to protect persons and property.” The law is not meant to legalize plunder, or be the
source of “organized injustice.”
Bastiat addresses the tyranny of socialism, how socialists want to play God, and how they actually despise Mankind, contrary to what they profess. He
also explains how socialists typically want to deny or ignore reason and facts and how they want to regiment people – and how, ultimately, they want
tyranny. It’s not just that socialism results in tyranny, but that tyranny is what socialists want to impose, that tyranny is ultimately their goal.
And, all of this was written in 1850 in France!  [you'd think he was writing it today <><]
Don’t just read the foreward. Read all of Bastiat’s work, so you can understand what law ought to be.  

    Quotes from "The Law" by Frederic Bastiat
    "The state is the great fiction by which everybody seeks
    to live at the expense of everybody else."

    “But how is this legal plunder to be identified? Quite simply. See if the law takes from some persons what belongs to them and gives it
    to other persons to whom it does not belong. See if the law benefits one citizen at the expense of another by doing what the citizen
    himself cannot do without committing a crime.”

    "When law and morality contradict each other, the citizen has the cruel alternative of either losing his moral sense or losing his respect
    for the law".
    "There is in all of us a strong disposition to believe that anything lawful is also legitimate. This belief is so widespread that many
    persons have erroneously held that things are “just” because the law makes them so."

    “Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property
    existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.”

    “It is not because men have made laws, that personality, liberty, and property exist. On the contrary, it is because personality, liberty,
    and property exist beforehand, that men make laws. What, then, is law? As I have said elsewhere, it is the collective organization of the
    individual right to lawful defense.”
    “As long as it is admitted that the law may be diverted from its true purpose--that it may violate property instead of protecting it--then
    everyone will want to participate in making the law, either to protect himself against plunder or to use it for plunder.”

    "The law is guilty of the evils it is supposed to punish".
    "See if the law takes from some persons what belongs to them, and gives it to other persons to whom it does not belong. See if the law
    benefits one citizen at the expense of another by doing what the citizen himself cannot do without committing a crime. Then abolish this
    law without delay, for it is not only an evil itself, but also it is a fertile source for further evils because it invites reprisals."  READ MORE
~submitted by Cathy C.


    "To all militia members in Michigan....Support the Patriot Union and Veteran Defenders of America initiative for States Rights now Through the
    Balance of powers Act...Things are moving, we need your support....."
    .~submitted by JJ

[I posted this when I received it before I did research, I will leave it up, but the Patriots Union is a LLC with a fee to join.  Check out the document link the
Balance of Powers Act and look at the address at the bottom, it says a great deal since it is a corporation,  and I haven't checked the Veteran Defenders
of America yet.  I will post more information as I receive it.
Here is another document I found doing a search, perhaps someone can look at this and
discern for validity then compare it to the patriot unions document for validity as well, it is nice to receive feedback from others TIA]

Every time there is a mass shooting, staged or not, there is an agenda that follows:  someone must pay!  Doesn't really matter who or what, but there
must be retribution, and ah yes! The defacto politicians always just happen to have the solution...there mantra for years has been to band guns, disarm
the American people.  

What we don't realize is we're in the pot and the water is getting hot, close to the boiling point (for those that do not know, I'm referring to the frog science,
if you put a frog in boiling water they know and will quickly jump out, but if you put that frog in cold water and slowly turn up the heat it will cook to death
because it gradually adjusts to the temperature without knowing it is being cooked).  

When was the frog (America) put in the pot of cold water, almost as soon as we were liberated by our Declaration of Independence, but I'll fast forward to
current events and our Second Amendment right, when was it put in the pot of cold water, probably when we didn't say no to the registering of our
firearms or when we didn't say no to the law that Felons could not own firearms, and that law was a huge step towards where we are today, because that
law made it possible to reduce more firearm owners by creating more felons, elementary my dear Watson!  There wasn't even a time limit put on this
"felon denial of firearms" so if a person truly had a change of heart, as we most do as we get older, even after ten or twenty years they still could not
legally own a firearm. Praise God, He forgives, even if the US Corporate government does not.  To make it worse maybe the felony didn't even  involve a
firearm, wonderful justice isn't it?   Registering firearms put us in the pot, Regulating turned up the heat, Allowing a ban on ANY firearm is bringing us to a
full boil!    Saying NO is jumping out before we completely boil!

Do we have laws on the books against crime, of course we do but we, the people are manipulated by mainstream media (MSM) to get caught in the
emotion of the moment and their continuous brainwashing of "misplaced blame."  I think ALL people, no matter the race, ideology, religion, faith, or
indifference will agree that as a society we do NOT KILL, STEAL, OR LIE.  This is why we have laws to prosecute those that do not adhere to this basic
moral code or law. When you make politics and/or money your god there is no foundation for truth to stand on.  If you are a murderer, thief or liar, would
you legislate against it?  Or would you redirect blame elsewhere and in an arena that would provide for even greater control and security against those
that know the truth and will stop you?  Our protection is first, our Creator, second our Bill of Rights, third our Declaration of Independence, and last our
Constitution.  Their security is removing these protections given us by our very wise founding fathers.  TRUTH  NEVER BECOMES OBSOLETE... IT'S

When is the last time you heard anyone demand "CAPITAL PUNISHMENT" for murder or rape?  We have the technology today to absolutely convict most
crimes on DNA alone, why isn't this information being used to enforce JUSTICE  and rid society of those that perpetrate such evil against innocent
people?  Could it be they are protecting themselves and those they assign to certain tasks for them?  How quickly would murder and rape disappear if the
criminal were given the death sentence?  Could it be that we no longer seek justice because of our own nature and ability to do what we know we
shouldn't be doing? Crimes that leave a victim in its wake need to be dealt with harshly, but how is it true justice or protecting the people by placing more
regulations and laws on those that do not break the law?  Where is the logic and common sense in this? Some might even say, wait a minute, what about
forgiveness?  Yes, we are to forgive but forgiveness does not always negate consequences to criminal actions that take another's life, does forgiveness
bring them back, no it doesn't, neither does capital punishment, but when one human being willfully and deliberately takes another human beings life it
should be a capital offense to deter others from carrying out the same action.  Again "misplaced blame" if murderers were given a death sentence it
certainly would make people think about what they are about to do and what it will cost them, but when their crimes are just passed onto the law abiding
people, there is no real deterrent against the crime, and people are still dying, but INNOCENT people instead of the guilty, its insanity!

When have you heard our legislatures target "VIOLENT VIDEO GAMES"?  Oh, there might be a mention here and there, but no, their goal is to disarm
their greatest fear!  There was an excellent episode of Touched By An Angel on last night (GMC) it was called, "Virtual Reality Series" and I suggest every
parent view that episode, it is  #918 and was released in 2003.  Please view this show and share with others.  I think it can be watched on but not
sure.  You'll have to do your own homework on that one but if you have children and are concerned about what is happening I strongly suggest you watch
it and rethink your allowing your children to continuously play violent video games that "train and desensitize" them to become Killers, there is a
connection whether you want to acknowledge it or not.

Then there is the psychotropic drugs that our children and young people are getting now, with more frequency than antibiotics and vaccinations!  There is
a list that was mentioned on a radio program of the drug that each mass murderer was taking, or just coming off,  at the time of their shootings, and all of
the shootings that have taken place psychotropic drugs were involved.  Why isn't there a loud cry for these to be banned?  Yes, there are some calling for
it, but nothing will happen because that is not their agenda, but they will use this symptom to turn the burner up higher.  Instead of banning psychotropic
drugs they will again decree that anyone using psychotropic drugs cannot own firearms and it will be so broad in language it will again reduce our armed
population, and isn't it curious that one of the first things they do is medicate our veterans  how handy is that?  And so many of our children have been or
currently are medicated so actually banning guns is all saber rattling because they know exactly what they are doing, and the compromise the people will
make to keep their second amendment right is to allow the denial of firearms to people that take prescription medications, of course, at first it will only be
the psychotropic drugs, and hey, I don't use those. The NEW healthcare plan gives no patient/doctor confidentiality to anyone and your doctor is dictated
to by DC on the care you can and cannot receive.  When the medical records show that psychotropic drugs have been taken, it will be the same as felony
charges, you will be forever banned from owning firearms legally.  The water is ready to boil America, do you feel it yet?

The grass roots people can see and understand the problems, they have good common sense and know right from wrong.  If the people can see the root
problem why is it that we are being made to believe that most Americans don't?  Remember the MSM is very controlled.  Only stories that are fabricated
towards their agenda will be released to the public.  Not all alternative media can be believed either.  People, we have to discern truth for ourselves,
connect with one another, share notes of what we know to be true based on actual documented fact, and even then it still could be questionable.  We do
know biblical truths, principles, and values; and maybe if we model these for others and let our voices be heard for truth and Justice, just maybe, by the
grace of Almighty God, He'll hear from Heaven and heal our land, if it is in accordance with His Will. <><  

In God Is Our Trust,
Bonnie Frownfelter

Reach out to people in your local communities face to face by holding town hall meetings, build jural assemblies in your area to bring a voice of the people
to your local government.  Do not attempt to approach your local government  alone, but do your ground work first in bringing the people together, then
as a group, and a fairly large group, approach those that hold elected positions, especially your local sheriff.    The local sheriff is supposed to serve and
protect the people that elect him/her.  If they will not honor their oath and work for you, replace him/her with someone that will.  Depending how large your
geographical location is will determine the size of the group that will be needed to have a strong voice in your community.
This can be done by publishing in the local paper that a town hall meeting for the people is going to take place with the date, time, and location of the
meeting included.  You can also reach people by handing out flyers or maybe even knocking on your neighbor’s door to get acquainted.  If you hold a
meeting, let the first meeting just be a meet and greet with a brief summary of the coming agendas.  Ask for input about what they’d like to discuss and
what their complaints are, usually zoning is an issue in most communities because of Sustainable Development, which is the new political correctness for
the Agenda 21 Agenda.  Try to find out what is affecting them the most in your area, whether it is regulations on businesses, traffic violations (speed
traps) excessive taxes etc.    When the problems that concern them are brought to the table then offer to help them find a solution, this does not mean to
do it for them, but help them and others to be proactive in solving the problems, and this is where the Jural Assembly comes into being.
Do not immediately start talking about all the “conspiracy theory” information.  We know it is fact, but most do not.  People don’t care how much you know,
until they know how much you care!  Let the first meeting just be about growing awareness and fellowship in the community for support of one another, a
true, “of, by, and for the people” working together as a community for solutions, and to educate them about the usurpation of our de jure republic.
In the coming days I will speak more on procedures and how to effectively gain control over the agenda’s that are being implemented in your local areas.   

January 07, 2013  Sermon - Christian Patriot - Boston, 1840
July 05, 1840
Rev. Mellish Irving Motte (1801-1881) was originally from Charleston, South Carolina. He obtained a Bachelors of Arts from Harvard in 1821 and became
pastor of the South Congregational Church in Boston on May 21, 1828. In this 1840 sermon, Rev. Motte encourages Christians to fully engage the
culture, especially in the political arena. He decries politicians acting out of self-interest and greed rather than making decisions based upon what is
morally right and wrong. Motte insists that religious morality is the very first manifestation of true patriotism and "Public virtue is the strongest spirit of
national vitality." He reminds his listeners that nations must be judged in the present since they do not exist in eternity and national ruin awaits national
unrighteousness. Rev. Motte states that America's Fathers founded the country on Christian principles and intended for the United States to be a
Christian nation. According to Motte, the realization of this goal is to be found in individual piety and allegiance to righteousness over any political party.
Excerpt from the  sermon:

    "And, then, to make all that is given to us safe for us, and to expect a blessing continuance, we must remember God, and insist on a religious
    morality as the very first manifestation of a true patriotism. Ay, patriotism, that most abused words. Alas! That it is every vaunted and
    bravadoed by the scoffer and the profligate, not knowing, that blessed is that people, and that alone, whose God is the Lord. Without him
    they may speak great swelling words of vanity; but bombastic professions and oratorical displays are not the disinterested self-denial and
    sober toils of a virtuous citizen, who fears God and honors government, and serves and saves the state without boasting. He alone is a
    patriot. By such alone the country stands.

    The Ruler of nations hath uttered the decree. From beginning of time his world has illustrating it. As surely as he is just and the King of
    nations as of individuals; as surely as there is truth taught by experience, and the unvarying certainty of the same effects from the same
    causes, according to the natural constitution he has impressed on his universe, the past, in all quarters of the globe, bids us look well to it.
    You may be the traitor within the garrison, though treason to the country be furthest from your thoughts. You may invoke ruin upon it when
    you are shouting, louder than any, the glory of its institutions. You may be the deadly enemy, though you shed your blood for it. Look into the
    nature of things. When hath a righteous nation perished? Where is there one doing justice and judgment, and it is not well with it? Public
    virtue is the strongest spirit of national vitality; and private virtue is the life-blood, coursing through every artery and vein, large and small, of
    the public institutions.

    On the other hand, is it not undeniable from reason, scripture, and experience, that predominance of selfish principles and corrupt morals is
    the unfailing cause of calamities, perplexities, and ruin in a country? Reason tells us, that the character of the Judge of all the earth is the
    pledged to have it so. Vice, in the individual, may not always meet its retribution, nor virtue its reward, in this world, because there is to be
    another, of more perfect retribution for individuals. But nations exist here alone. Unlike the soul, they are annihilated at their temporal
    dissolution. Therefore, if their fortunes and fate be subject of the Divine Providence, to their present existence, which is the only one, must be
    applied the principle of its moral rule."
    Read complete  SERMON

[Until "We, the people" are willing to see the true root of the problem in American there can be no true change for we, the people.  Almighty God, through
His biblical principles needs to be re-crowned KING over our land, or we need to strike "In God We Trust" and "GOD BLESS AMERICA" from all public
records as it has been suggested in the past.  Our de jure republic is one of "SELF-GOVERNANCE" that springs forth from a virtuous people, if the
virtuous people of America are unwilling to stand up, unite and let their voice be heard to make these corrections, and to do it right where we are in our
communities, and if we are not willing to get involved face to face then we need to quietly go back to our "lukewarm" life to wallow in what we blindly think is
safe and secure until one day we are no longer able to bury our head in the sand because the sand is gone.  It is time for Almighty God's "Christian
Soldiers" to unite peaceably, but with a STRONG RESOLVE, we've been quiet too long <><]

January 06, 2013  From the Canada Press:  The War Against The UN Agenda 21 Just Got Hotter  by Dr. Ileana Johnson Paugh
The war against U.N. Agenda 21 just got hotter in Virginia. Thinking Americans understand now what U.N. Agenda 21 is and are not backing down from
fighting the anti-American, anti-prosperity, wealth redistribution scheme of the United Nations against our way of life.

The U.N. has deemed commercial agriculture unsustainable and has used taxpayer dollars and local supervisors to re-zone, re-shape, and prohibit land
use for local agriculture or building that is not approved by their bio-diversity plan of limiting human habitation – all in the name of saving the planet.

Our planet does not need saving, Mother Earth is doing fine . The problem lies with progressive humans in positions of power who want to control
everything we do while they line their pockets with our hard-earned taxpayer dollars.

Unfair regulatory actions against Martha Boneta, a farmer in Fauquier County, Virginia, “violate fundamental rights and unfairly restrict her property
rights.” Delegate L. Scott Lingamfelter (R-Woodbridge/31st district) plans to strengthen Virginia’s Right to Farm Act and to “protect farmers against future
encroachments by local government.”

[The above action is exactly why people need to find out what is happening in your LOCAL area's.  We can no longer sit back and say nothing just
because it does not affect us, because it is affecting us and the quality of our food.  It is the independent farmers that are being driven out of business so
the big AG Farms have total control.  This is what the UN Agenda 21, also know as "SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT" is doing here and around the world.  
We need to stand behind these local businesses and support them with our business and our VOICE <><

January 04, 2013  House Speaker John Boehner’s address to the opening session of the 113th Congress (Transcript)
This might mean something and it might not, he is a politician and we know they say pretty much anything to appease the people, but I'm an eternal
optimist so I choose to hope it reveals that the scales are starting to tip back towards our constitutional Republic of, by, and for the people, however,
being also the realist that I am the opening line is a red flag but I do know time reveals all:

    HOUSE SPEAKER JOHN BOEHNER: Leader Pelosi, members of the House and Senate, dear family and friends, fellow countrymen:

    We meet again at democracy’s great port of call. Every two years, at this hour, the Constitution brings a new order to this House. It is an
    interlude for reflection, a glimpse of old truths.
    To our new members and their families, welcome. You are likely feeling awestruck right about now. History runs through here. And now you
    are among a select few to share in this privilege.  
    For those who are returning, who have walked these aisles before, maybe it’s time we feel awestruck again.
    The way our founders envisioned it, the republic would be led by citizens who recognize that the blessing of governing ourselves requires
    that we give something of ourselves. Everything depended on this. So they made each other – and their successors – swear an oath of
    In a few moments, I will take this oath for the twelfth time as representative of the Eighth District of Ohio. It is word for word the same oath we
    all take.Note that it makes no mention of party, faction, or title … contains no reference to agendas or platforms – only to the Constitution
    The one addition we dare to make, as George Washington did at the first inaugural, is to invoke the assistance of our Heavenly Father.
    This covenant makes us servants of posterity. It calls us to refuse the pull of passing interests and follow the fixed star of a more perfect
    Put simply, we are sent here not to be something, but to do something – to do the right thing.
    It’s a big job, and it comes with big challenges.
    Our government has built up too much debt. Our economy is not producing enough jobs. These are not separate problems.
    At $16 trillion and rising, our national debt is draining free enterprise and weakening the ship of state.
    The American Dream is in peril so long as its namesake is weighed down by this anchor of debt. Break its hold, and we begin to set our
    economy free. Jobs will come home. Confidence will come back.

    We do this not just to boost GDP or reduce unemployment, but to secure for our children a future of freedom and opportunity. Nothing is
    more important.
    As Washington wrote in his farewell address, we should not “throw upon posterity the burden which we ourselves ought to bear.”
    Well, the burden is ours and so is the opportunity.
    There is no substitute for the wisdom of the people. We are their servants. As Speaker, I pledge to listen and do all I can to help you carry
    out the oath you are about to take.
    Because in our hearts, we know it is wrong to pass on this debt to our kids and grandkids. Now we have to be willing – truly willing – to make
    this right.
    Public service was never meant to be an easy living. Extraordinary challenges demand extraordinary leadership.
    So if you have come here to see your name in lights or to pass off political victory as accomplishment, you have come to the wrong place.
    The door is behind you.
    If you have come here humbled by the opportunity to serve; if you have come here to be the determined voice of the people; if you have
    come here to carry the standard of leadership demanded not just by our constituents but by the times, then you have come to the right place.
    There is a time to every purpose under Heaven. For the 113th Congress, it is a time to rise. When the day is over, and the verdict is read,
    may it be said that we well and faithfully did our duty to ensure freedom will endure and prevail.    So help us God. END

January 03, 2013   Do Not Fear Hypothetical Dangers (excerpt from, "HOW TO WIN THE WAR FOR YOUR MIND" by Brandon Smith, link below)
    "Fear is the weapon of choice when it comes to totalitarian proponents. Conquering armies and bureaucracies are notorious for exaggerating their
    strength and numbers in order to squelch the fighting spirit of those they intend to rule. Genghis Kahn, for instance, used the tactic of exaggerated
    numbers, along with vicious genocide, to strike terror in regions he had not yet attempted to overtake. Upon his arrival, the Mongol hordes had
    received such a reputation (some of it fabricated) that many regions surrendered immediately without question.

    When becoming an activist against a criminal establishment, it is very common to be the target of fear campaigns. Today, those of us in the liberty
    movement hear warnings from “random” concerned parties constantly telling us that our efforts are “all for nothing,” that we are “making ourselves
    targets.” That the globalist system is far too strong and far too advanced to be defeated. That they have predator drones and NSA databases and
    soldiers without empathy etc, etc.

    Their hope is to make us afraid of hypothetical situations which can neither be confirmed nor denied. To make us obsess over the "odds" rather
    than the objective. In other words, they hope to encourage a state of mass cowardice. To undo this tactic, you must remain focused on your goal
    regardless of the possible danger. That is to say, the strength of the enemy, whether real or fantasy, is irrelevant. It is meaningless. Goliath is
    nothing but an obstacle, and all obstacles can be dealt with. Move forward toward the objective and never stop " READ COMPLETE ARTICLE
~submitted by Cathy C.

January 02, 2013    An Email to Send to Your County Sheriff
The following letter is a sample of a letter that I suggest that you email to your County Sheriff. We need hundreds if not thousands of Patriots to send
emails to their County Sheriff. We need to find out which of the Sheriffs are working for the people and which ones are working for the Federal
government. Copy the following letter and send it to all of your friends and neighbors and ask them to do the same. Ask everyone to email their Sheriff
and demand that he or she make a commitment to honor their oath of office.

    Dear Sheriff ________________,
    As the Chief Law Enforcement Officer in _______________County you were required to take an oath to preserve, protect and defend the
    Constitution against all enemies both foreign and domestic. Having taken that oath I would like to know if you will honor your oath by refusing
    to enforce Federal rules, regulations and directives that violate the Constitution and/or the Bill of Rights.
    The Second Amendment clearly proclaims that the people have a right to own guns and in the Bill of Rights, the government is prohibited
    from infringing on the right of the people to own guns if they choose to do so. Your primary job is to preserve, protect and defend the
    Constitution and the rights of the people that live in ______________ our County.
    The Supreme Court has ruled that the Federal government has no lawful jurisdiction in the counties and that when a Sheriff chooses to
    enforce an unconstitutional directive, he is violating his Constitutional Oath.
    The people of _______________ County are the employer and you are the employee and we expect you to represent us and not the
    Federal government. As your employer, I would like to know if you are given an order that violates the Constitution, will you honor your oath
    or will you do as directed by the President of the United States.
    xxxx  xxxxxxxx [your name here]
    (xxx) xxx-xxxx  [your phone number here]
~submitted by Keith B

[It might be good to refer to the "Dick Act of 1902" or more properly known as the "Efficiency of Militia Bill H.R. 11654" as well; it can be found HERE.
The Dick Act’s most quoted synopsis is: The Dick Act of 1902 also known as the Efficiency of Militia Bill H.R. 11654, of June 28, 1902 invalidates all so-
called gun-control laws.   
 MILITIA HANDBOOK- Regulations for the Organized Militia

Send a letter if you cannot email, call or even better, stop in and talk to him/her face to face.  Relationships are built on a better foundation when started
in person or at least on the phone where a real voice can be heard.  Email can sometimes project a different tone than the one intended. Which brings me
to the below message I also received <><]

    Subject: It is Your Patriotic Duty
    I am requesting that someone or a group of individuals make an appointment to visit with your County Sheriff and that you ask him or her if they will
    honor their oath of office and preserve, protect and defend the Constitution against unconstitutional Federal rules and regulations. The voters in
    each County needs to know if their Sheriff will honor their oath or turn their back on their Constituents and the Constitution that they have sworn to
    Every County Sheriff needs to sign a pledge to honor their oath and it is the responsibility of Patriots like yourself to hold them accountable. Will
    you contact your Sheriff and ask him to honor his oath? If you are willing to do so, please let us at the Constitutional Sheriff's Website know if your
    Sheriff is working for the people or the criminals on Capitol Hill.
~submitted by WRAM
excerpt from the "
War Department,
March 12, 1910.
The following regulations governing the Organized Militia of the several States, Territories, and the District of Columbia, in its relations with the War
Department, under the provisions of the Constitution of the United States and the laws of Congress thereunder, are promulgated for the guidance of all
concerned, and will be strictly observed.
J. M. Dickinson,
Secretary of War.

E. M. Weaver,
Colonel, General Staff Corps,
Assistant to the Chief of Staff)
Chief of Division.

    constitutional provisions pertaining to the militia and
    Federal Laws Enacted in Accordance Therewith.

    1. The relations of the War Department to the Organized Militia
    of the several States, Territories, and District of Columbia are governed
    by the provisions of the Constitution of the United States
    which pertain to the militia and by the federal laws which have been
    enacted by Congress pursuant to the authority conferred by the
    constitutional provisions. These constitutional provisions and federal
    laws may be enumerated as follows:
    constitutional provisions.

    2. A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a
    free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be
    infringed. (Art. II, amendments.) [emphasis mine]

    3. The Congress shall have power * * *
    (a) To provide for calling forth the militia to execute the laws of
    the Union, suppress insurrections, and repel invasions.
    (b) To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining the militia
    and for governing such part of them as may be employed in the
    service of the United States, reserving to the States, respectively, the
    appointment of the officers and the authority of training the militia
    according to the discipline prescribed by Congress. (Art. I, sec. 8.)
    (c) To make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying
    into execution the foregoing powers and all other powers vested
    by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any
    department or officer thereof. (Art. I, sec. 8.)

    4. The executive power shall be vested in a President of the United
    States of America. (Art. II, sec. 1.)

    5. The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and
    Navy of the United States and of the militia of the several States
    when called into the actual service of the United States. (Art. II,
    sec. 2.)

    6. The United States shall guarantee to every State in. this Union
    a republican form of government, [emphasis mine] and shall protect each of them
    against invasion; and on application of the legislature or of the
    executive (when the legislature can not be convened) against domestic
    violence. (Art. IV, sec.

I received the following information from Donna Streier concerning Tim Turner's court case.  I'm posting it for those that would like an update on his case
and others that would like the information for educational purposes or both.  There are links to the attachments that were included with it:

    January 1, 2013
    Dear Free State Governors:
    Attached is a follow-up filing into President Turner’s case. It is actually a Criminal Complaint that is being filed with the United States House and
    Senate Judiciary Committee at the Dirksen Senate Office Building in Washington D.C.  PLEASE PASS THIS ON TO EVERYONE IN YOUR
    The House and Senate Judiciary Committee handles oversight of matters concerning the Department of Justice, the FBI and Territorial Courts,
    especially actions criminal in nature, whenever it is known that a judge or justice official commits a felony to conspire against an accused as has
    been done against James Timothy Turner.
    Listed below is a quick and brief synopsis of the attached filing. Reading of the actual eleven page filing is more in-depth and thorough. Be sure to
    look up all the referenced laws, acts, citations, cases, etc.
    The United States District Courts only have jurisdiction over civil cases and not criminal, as they have fraudulently claimed with Mr. Turner. The
    United States District Court of Alabama’s actions are under Color of Law. The judge in Mr. Turner’s case has violated his oath of office and is
    actually practicing law, by preventing Mr. Turner from filing anything into his case.
    The United States District Court of Alabama has denied and restricted Mr. Turner from his fundamental and Constitutional right to “assistance of
    counsel” by forcing him to employ counsel. The United States District Court of Alabama has denied Mr. Turner from Due Process of Law.
    Most of the charges against Mr. Turner are based on Title 18 of the United States Code; but, Title 18 is not law because it was never passed
    according to the quorum clause of the Constitution, Article 1, Section 5.
    A serious charge in the attached Criminal Complaint is against the Dept. of Justice for representing a foreign entity which in this case is the Internal
    Revenue Service, which is Fraud on the Court.
    Many of the charges in Mr. Turner’s case are direct violations of the Citizen Protection Act of 1998, such as “absence of probable cause seeking
    indictment”, “acting to impede right of discovery”, “failure to release information that would exonerate”, “attempting to influence/limit testimony to
    grand jury”, and failure to allow his right to defend himself before the Grand Jury in violation of the Constitution.

    These allegations could also very well lead to a violation of the Anti-Kickback Act by all the government participants involved. This is a very serious
    crime frequently committed these days in our country by courts and law enforcement officers who use prisoner’s names and case numbers by
    constructing “prisoner bonds,” using people as chattel to profit the government itself, public and private prisons and the large corporations who
    invest in these fraudulent securities.
    ANY ONE of these numerous charges would lead to an immediate dismissal of James Timothy Turner’s case and for his immediate release from
    incarceration. The system we are under in our country has gotten by with all of the above injustices and this needs to stop. Your help is needed to
    get these things out to the public immediately. “They” will not like to see this. Our public exposure of these gross injustices will go a very long way in
    helping our President and all our fellow Americans.
    The TRUTH is that Tim Turner did NOT commit any crimes; the only crimes here are the ones committed by the very judicial system set up to
    protect the innocent!  We are asking and imploring everyone reading this material to send it out to everybody you know.
    We need everyone to write to their Washington D.C. Senators and Representatives! You can find their contact information at http://www.usa.
    gov/Contact/Elected.shtml. Write up a simple note of complaint and include the attached 11 page filing.
    If each of us does not stand up now, we are likely to be in a similar situation one day.

    ATTENTION: We will be setting up a website this week solely for this cause. We are very serious! More exposure will be coming out. Documentation
    will also be made available to help the people who face various legal entanglements. PLEASE stay tuned!    
    PS: Also included is a “Bill of Particulars” that is being filed directly to the US District Court of Alabama
~submitted by Donna S


"A general dissolution of principles and manners will more surely overthrow the liberties of
America than the whole force of the common enemy. While the people are virtuous they
cannot be subdued; but when once they lose their virtue they will be ready to surrender
their liberties to the first external or internal invader. "
~Samuel Adams, letter to James Warren, February 12, 1779
[1828 Webster Dictionary: "Virtue is nothing but voluntary obedience to truth".]

"The man who reads nothing at all is better educated than the man who reads nothing but
~Thomas Jefferson
"We...the people" of Michigan
have inhabited our     FREE DE JURE STATE
Archived 2013 First