Enlarge to read
Here’s the transcript from the DOJ Press Release this morning. I copied & pasted so all errors are their errors as are the CAPS.
My opinion on this ..it’s SES CYA… the new video, “American SS Exposed”, that was released about the ‘unpackaging’ of their hidden reports they’re required by law to file spurred them into action for ‘Damage Control’. It is my thought this message is speaking about the Abel Danger & Field McConnell exposing the SES Treason. Their Report had numerous ‘traps’ set for anyone that tried to ‘unpackage’ the report. It is my thought, ONLY my thought this is the cyber-hacking they are speaking up and using Iran for cover.
I think they’re speaking to their own people and letting them know there won’t be an ‘investigation’ for their protection and conveniently the Iranian Hackers are in Iran.
They had to come up with HACKERS to pass blame for what they’ve been doing. Listen to the video below or use this LINK if you haven’t already listened to it then read this DOJ Press Release.
Remember the Russian Dossier FABRICATED to impeach President Trump. When you have total control over all law enforcement agencies at the highest level anything can be anything you want it to be. Especially nice how they say ‘innocent until proven guilty in America’ for the Iranians but railroaded Hammond’s, Bundy’s and others by fabrication and omission of evidence.
I’m glad I ‘captured’ the transcript because I just checked the ‘live feed’ link of DOJ Press Release and the transcript is no longer there, so it was only available during the live-feed.
TRANSCRIPT OF DOJ LIVE FEED PRESS RELEASE ON ‘CYBER HACKING’ 03/23/2018 – (Rosenstein and others) click continue reading to go to transcript:
Department of Justice
U.S. Attorney’s Office
Southern District of West Virginia
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Tuesday, March 20, 2018
Federal & State Law Enforcement Authorities Announce Formation of Special Unit to Fight Public Corruption LINK
Citizen Assistance Encouraged
Innovative Corruption “Button” Rolled Out
CHARLESTON, W.Va. — United States Attorney Mike Stuart and representatives from federal and state law enforcement announced today the formation of a Public Integrity Special Investigations Unit to investigate corrupt public officials, the misuse of public funds, campaign and election law violations and suspected criminal activity.
The Public Integrity Special Investigations Unit includes representatives from federal and state agencies including the Federal Bureau of Investigation; the United States Postal Inspection Service; the Internal Revenue Service – Criminal Investigation Division; the Inspector General’s Offices of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, the United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Department of Defense and the Department of Homeland Security; the West Virginia State Police; the West Virginia Commission on Special Investigations; and the West Virginia State Auditor’s Office. The West Virginia Secretary of State’s Office will assist in investigating campaign and election law violations.
“Maintaining public integrity is a tremendous priority for me and for the Southern District of West Virginia,” said U.S. Attorney Stuart. “Public corruption is a cancer on our system of government. If it’s not rooted out, the cancer grows. It causes the public to be cynical about the honesty of public officials and public institutions. There is an absolute burden on public officials and persons in a position of public authority to be honest brokers to protect the integrity of public service and the taxpayers’ wallets. Dirty politicians and dirty public officials must and will be held accountable for violations of the public trust,” Stuart continued. Continue reading
BILL OF RIGHTS PDF
THE Conventions of a number of the States having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best insure the beneficent ends of its institution…
Amendment I — Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Amendment II — A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Amendment III — No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.
Amendment IV — The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Amendment V — No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
Amendment VI — In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.
Amendment VII — In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.
Amendment VIII – Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.
Amendment IX — The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
Amendment X — The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
Received this complaint about new Land Assessment:
Have you gotten this years assessment yet?
MY 5 A WENT UP $600.00 MY 40 A WENT UP $10,100.00. A LATE 70’S POLE BARN AND A 1986 MOBILE HOME AND NO OTHER IMPROVEMENTS SINCE. SO HOW COULD THIS GO UP THAT MUCH IN VALUE? Now so you know the tax payer is paying for the assessor and then they are paying for.their yearly traning, and the board of review which is a joke!!
I think this assessing should be 10 or 15 yrs not every year ????
The assessor has never seen the property. [end]
Below is the form you have to use to protest your new tentative tax assessment.to your local review board.
This form is issued under the authority of P.A. 206
Annex 1 and 2 (Manual for Courts-Martial)
2018 Amendments to the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States
LAW & JUSTICE. LINK
Issued on: March 1, 2018
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code (Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. 801-946), and in order to prescribe amendments to the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, prescribed by Executive Order 12473 of April 13, 1984, as amended, it is hereby ordered as follows:
Section 1. Part II, Part III, and Part IV of the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, are amended as described in Annex 1, which is attached to and made a part of this order.
Sec. 2. The amendments in Annex 1 shall take effect on the date of this order, subject to the following:
(a) Nothing in Annex 1 shall be construed to make punishable any act done or omitted prior to the date of this order that was not punishable when done or omitted.
(b) Nothing in Annex 1 shall be construed to invalidate the prosecution of any offense committed before the date of this order. The maximum punishment for an offense committed before the date of this order shall not exceed the maximum punishment in effect at the time of the commission of such offense.
(c) Nothing in Annex 1 shall be construed to invalidate any nonjudicial punishment proceeding, restraint, investigation, referral of charges, trial in which arraignment occurred, or other action begun prior to the date of this order, and any such nonjudicial punishment proceeding, restraint, investigation, referral of charges, trial in which arraignment occurred, or other action shall proceed in the same manner and with the same effect as if the amendments in Annex 1 had not been prescribed. Continue reading
The following 1990-2018 timeline and supporting facts provide unmistakable evidence of dereliction of duty, fraud,public corruption, the appearance of impropriety, racketeering, monopoly and anti-trust by senior United States government officials, Harvard, Yale and Stanford academics and alumni, judges,law firms and their commercial accomplices. American patent law itself has been hijacked by these individuals and their organizations.Alternatively, go to an interactive database library for a list and links to all the files, listed by date and alphabetically,at https://www.fbcoverup.com/docs/library
PDF link below of the above excerpt –
They’ve been doing this spraying since the 60’s. I use to have a military file that mentioned ‘Bio-warfare’ and using it on ‘citizens’.
What happened to our blue skies? Why do we get a ‘white shade’ pulled across the sky? Why are there no longer ‘ConTrails’ which are ice crystals that form from high altitude and dissipate within 30 – 45 seconds as they drop to warmer air? Why do so many people now have asthma, lung issues, coughs, sore throats and other upper respiratory illnesses and diseases?
This is not by accident – research ‘Weather Wars” click on Resources above and scroll down to the files. Education is key, not ‘Indoctrination’.
Relevant climate response tests for stratospheric aerosol injection: A combined ethical and scientific analysis
In this paper, we focus on stratospheric sulfate injection as a geoengineering scheme, and provide a combined scientific and ethical analysis of climate response tests, which are a subset of outdoor tests that would seek to impose detectable and attributable changes to climate variables on global or regional scales. We assess the current state of scientific understanding on the plausibility and scalability of climate response tests. Then, we delineate a minimal baseline against which to consider whether certain climate response tests would be relevant for a deployment scenario. Our analysis shows that some climate response tests, such as those attempting to detect changes in regional climate impacts, may not be deployable in time periods relevant to realistic geoengineering scenarios. This might pose significant challenges for justifying stratospheric sulfate aerosol injection deployment overall. We then survey some of the major ethical challenges that proposed climate response tests face. We consider what levels of confidence would be required to ethically justify approving a proposed test; whether the consequences of tests are subject to similar questions of justice, compensation, and informed consent as full-scale deployment; and whether questions of intent and hubris are morally relevant for climate response tests. We suggest further research into laboratory-based work and modeling may help to narrow the scientific uncertainties related to climate response tests, and help inform future ethical debate. However, even if such work is pursued, the ethical issues raised by proposed climate response tests are significant and manifold.
1 Introduction Continue reading
If you know someone living in CA it’d probably be good to given them this information. The AlIENS that are already there are going to have some competition. See how corrupt these Communist Global Democrats are? RINO’s are right there with them as well.
Maxine Waters tells United Bank that she needs their money to get elected but doesn’t want anyone to mention the 41,000 Somalian Refugees being re-located in LA until after the November elections bc it may hurt her chances of re-election.