For decades, government’s power, at every level, has increased exponentially to the point where the people are no longer sovereign. They are but hapless “victims” of a centralized government whose constitutional limits were breached beginning as far back as the Civil War. The people of America, thanks to the 14th Amendment, are now just “citizens UNDER THE JURISDICTION THEREOF of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.” It was supposed to be that the United States and the State wherein we reside were under the JURISDICTION of WE THE PEOPLE, not the other way around. Continue reading
Michigan House Passes Bill to Ban “Material Support or Resources” for Warrantless Federal Surveillance
Posted:Wed, 17 Jan 2018 20:26:39 GMTPosted:2018-01-17T20:26:39Z
LANSING, Mich. (Jan. 17, 2018) – Today, the Michigan House overwhelmingly passed a bill that would ban “material support or resources” for warrantless federal surveillance programs. This represents an essential step states need to take at a time when the federal government seems unlikely to ever end its own spying. Continue reading
BEWARE! The roadside drug tests via saliva also gives your DNA to the state. Such an invasion of privacy is unconscionable AND unconstitutional.
JUST SAY NO–TO ROADSIDE DRUG TESTING LINK
Established by the Michigan Legislature, under Public Acts 242 and 243 of 2016, the program involves having specially trained police officers (Drug Recognition Experts or DREs) do roadside drug tests of saliva of those suspected of driving while impaired (DWI) by common drugs such as amphetamines, opiates, marijuana, meth, cocaine and benzodiazepines.
Each of 26 Drug Recognition Experts, working for a dozen police agencies within the five counties, will carry a device called the Alere DDS2 oral fluid test instrument, which will be used to measure for the presence of drugs in drivers’ saliva. A specialized swab inserted into the drivers’ mouth tells officers when there is enough saliva on it to be tested. This swab is then inserted into the bottom of the device and in about five minutes it gives either a positive or negative result.
In those counties, the police still need a valid reason to make a traffic stop, and the DREs are trained to only conduct a saliva test after several other protocols have been followed, including well known field sobriety tests, to alert them that impairment may be present. Due to the intrusive nature of the test, a driver has the right to refuse the oral swab. This right comes with a cost just like refusing to consent to a breathalyzer, however, in that the driver will be given a civil infraction with a hefty $200 fine.
Yet, if you do happen to venture into one of these counties and get stopped and are asked to submit to an ‘oral fluid test’, I would recommend you take the $200 fine and refuse their offer. I suggest you do this even if you’re like me and you’ve never taken one of these drugs in your life. Even if you are okay with having your rights violated, refuse. It potentially can save you from being criminally convicted and/or suffering monetary damage of which a couple of hundred dollars would seem cheap. Trust me, but if you don’t…
This land grab is taking place in every state to some degree. If the people do not stand for one another there will be no privately owned left to leave as an inheritance to your children or children’s children.
MORLEY DENIED JURY TRIAL
Folks we have a constitutional crisis. We have public servants, yes judges are servants and they work for us, who are absolutely out of control. They have created a lawless legal system and are using it to crush property owners. Please post this and share with others. We need folks to wake up and realize what is happening. Why would the STATE go to such extremes to deny having a jury hear this man’s case? And how about all these other cases they have used to “justify” denying this man a jury trial, what happened in those cases. Does the STATE not want the people to know what is happening behind the closed doors of the court?
Please read Art I § 14 Jury trials and Art III § 7 Common law and statutes, continuance below from the Constitution for Michigan before reading the excerpt concerning the right to a jury trial from the Jack Morley property rights case involving wetlands in Michigan. You do not need to be an attorney to read and understand the courts double talk and circular logic depriving Mr. Morley a jury to hear this unjust case against him. I have attached the whole Appeals Courts opinion for those who care to read the whole tyrannical court opinion.
1963 Michigan Constitution
Art I § 14 Jury trials. The right of trial by jury shall remain, but shall be waived in all civil cases unless demanded by one of the parties in the manner prescribed by law. In all civil cases tried by 12 jurors a verdict shall be received when 10 jurors agree.
Art III § 7 Common law and statutes, continuance. The common law and the statute laws now in force, not repugnant to this constitution, shall remain in force until they expire by their own limitations, or are changed, amended or repealed.
Before: SAAD, P.J., and STEPHENS and O’BRIEN, JJ.
Defendant Jack O. Morley appeals as of right the final order of the circuit court granting judgment in favor of plaintiff, the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). We affirm. Continue reading
We were not surprised at the actions of our constitutionally bankrupt state. Until more people see and understand what is happening, nothing will change.
Today we plead with our legislators…
Please… Don’t search my home, car, email, or person without a warrant!
Please… Don’t take away my right to keep and bear arms!
Please… Don’t confiscate my legal, private property!
Please… Don’t force me into government healthcare!
Please… Don’t nationalize and militarize our local police!
Please… Don’t indoctrinate my kids with socialism, perversion, and Satanism!
Please, Please, Please … and the list goes on and on and on.
We are now living in a KINGDOM and can only plead a case in front of one of the KINGDOMS JUDGES without a jury!
Thank you for posting, you are one who understands the attack on our freedom and is doing something about it. Thank you for all you do.
One other thing you can do.
Ask your state Representative and Senator to support House Bill 4847
House Bill 4847 would allow anyone bring a cause of action against the state the right to bring that suit in the County of origin and have that case heard by a jury or to have the case heard by an appointed judge in Detroit, Lansing, Troy or Grand Rapids at the court of claims.
A number of options exist and still considering, will keep you posted.
Drifting from the Constitution is how one gets lost in a sea of tyranny.
[Received this evening via email thank you Greg]
Just to show you how tricky our public servants have become I have copied an article from the Midland Daily New below with the link to the article. I highlighted below in the article the reporters very important comment “That’s because someone’s assets are tried in civil court, separate from the criminal process.” Our public servants in black robes are using legal foot work to steal from the people.
V Amendment says “; nor shall be compelled in any “criminal case” to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;” However, it also says “;nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.” , somehow the black robes feel they have a contract with us and have control over our property. Note how important commas and semicolons are in the law and the understanding of jurisdiction. Until we all learn some basic “law” this will continue un-checked.
Our Founders are turning in their graves and we should be fighting this with every breath. Bill Clinton is not the only “slick willie” in our public servants ranks.
Michigan’s civil asset forfeiture system under scrutiny [Article begins]
Updated: Sat May 30, 2015, 12:02 pm.
Michigan’s civil asset forfeiture system under scrutiny Associated Press
LANSING, Mich. (AP) — Gin Hency and Annette Shattuck describe themselves as soccer moms, active in their communities and in their children’s lives.
FEDERAL COURT JURISDICTION
Received the following message with pdf files today, thank you RB. It is published as I received it other than one word I placed “x’s” due to the nature of the word.
Email message received from: “This came in today on Skype from old Republicers. Don’t know where the case stands, but it is perfectly waged against the basxxxds! RB Landmark Income Tax Case: Supreme Court No. 14-1305 MAY 21, 2015 SUPREMECOURTCASE Relying on the provisions of the Constitution as ultimate proof, this petition presents incontrovertible evidence that no contemporary federal court has jurisdiction anywhere within the exterior limits of any of the 50 freely associated compact states of the Union.”
LII has no control over and does not endorse any external Internet site that contains links to or references LII.
Under a socialist government, few people have the right to own and control property. The government assumes ownership and control of private property, depriving the people of the rights that we value here in the United States.
However, as our government has started adopting socialistic agendas, they have followed the patterns of other socialist nations. One of those patterns is taking control of private property by means of the Environmental Protections Agency (EPA) and the Army Corps of Engineers.
BY CONSENT OF THE GOVERNED
A Film by Steve: Bates which took almost 9 months to make covering the multiple aspects and uses of the term, ‘consent of the governed’. Something members of the World Freeman Society have revoked by Claim of Right.
Governments, Police all operate by consent. They require your consent by acquiescence to make rulings, statutes, acts and war & taxes, all by your consent. Some things are good, we like Peace Officers keeping us safe, but do not consent to their revenue making activities. There are many good reasons to have a government, but we must remember who we are and who ‘they’ are.
We are the Public and they are the Public Servants. And when they forget that, and start treating us like their property, it is our duty to inform others, help educate and hold accountable those whose actions do not reflect the mandate we as the people demand.
“Consent Of The Governed: The Freeman Movement Defined” is nearly 3 hours long, and covers a wide range of topics that effect and hinder our human freedom when dealing with civil SERVANTS who seek to claim authority over us, so be prepared to set aside some educational viewing time … however, I promise you, it will be time well spent.
COUNTER STRATEGIES FOR AGENDA 21
The last stand against tyranny takes place in the jury box. The legislative branch may pass unconstitutional laws and the judiciary branch may uphold them. However, the individual citizen can nullify any law via jury nullification. Learn your rights as a juror. Most likely, you will not be told about them in the courtroom! Read More here: LINK
YOU HAVE POWER IN THE JURY BOX
Jury Nullification is something you’re not told about but it is your RIGHT as jurors to implement. Of course the judges do not want you to know this because they get paid huge money for judgments processed through their courts. It is your duty to JUDGE THE LAW AT THE SAME TIME YOU ARE JUDGING THE DEFENDANT, and perhaps judge the law first if it is a constitutional law that left a “victim” in its wake. The state can NOT be
the victim! You have power in the JURY BOX…one of the ways to over-turn tyranny is in the JURY BOX… do not avoid jury duty..accept it and bring true justice to the people… do NOT listen to what the Judge INSTRUCTS you to do..just remember if there is “.no victim there is no crime” no matter what the facts say. That is the foundation of our Constitution and Bill of Rights…Please watch the very informative video on a
layman’s guide to jury nullification: LINK
TWO SIGNS THAT CAN BE PRINTED AND POSTED
Constitutional No Trespassing Sign
INCLUDING ALL PUBLIC OFFICIALS
OR AGENTS THEREOF:
This is to put you on notice that the Owner or Tenant of this property requires that all Public Officials abide by the provisions of the Supreme Law of the Land
THE CONSTITUTION of the
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Bill of Rights
Amendment Two: “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed”
Amendment Four:“the right of the people to be secure in their person, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be violated:
ANY OFFICER OF PERSON WITHOUT CONSENT OF THE OWNER OR TENANT WHO ATTEMPTS TO ENTER THIS PROPERTY WITHOUT A PROPER WARRANT AS DESCRIBED BELOW WILL BE TREATED AS ANY OTHER INTRUDER WOULD ATTEMPTING TO TRESPASS, EXTORT, INJURE, OPPRESS, THREATEN, INTIMIDATE, OR IN ANY OTHER WAY JEOPARDIZE THE RIGHTS OF THE OWNERS OR TENANTS OF THIS PROPERTY
THE UNDERSIGNED WILL THEREFORE REFUSE TO PERMIT ANY SEARCH, AUDIT ASSESSMENT, OR INSPECTION WHATSOEVER OF THIS PROPERTY WITHOUT THE PRESENTATION OF A PROPER WARRANT DULY SIGNED AS DESCRIBED BY CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT IV
“AND NO WARRANT SHALL ISSUE BUT UPON PROBABLE CAUSE SUPPORTED BY OATH OR AFFIRMATION AND PARTICULARLY DESCRIBING THE PLACE TO BE SEARCHED AND THE PERSON OR THINGS TO BE SEIZED”
VIOLATORS MAY NOT BE FINED MORE THAN $10,000 OR IMPRISONED NOT MORE THAN TEN YEARS OR BOTH USC TITLE 18 SEC 241 & 242
WARNING! Private Property
Persons entering this property must hold contract or license with the owner granting ingress with indemnity and carry on-person proper identification to verify such contract or license.
You are hereby notified that the owner of this property requires all public officials, agents, or person(s) to abide by the supreme law of the land. The Constitution for the Untied States of America and ratified Amendments thereto.
Owner will refuse to permit and hereby refuses to permit any access, search, audit, assessment, or inspection whatsoever without the presentation of a warrant prepared as prescribed by Constitutional Amendment IV and XVI and â€˜particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons or things to be seized. Alleged zoning or code non-compliances do not establish Constitutional reasons for entering this property. Violators will be trespassers will be treated as intruders.
VIOLATORS TAKE NOTICE
Any official, agent, or person(s) entering this property without the consent or the owner without proper warrant as described above, will be treated as an invasive species and disease vector.
As an intruder attempting to trespass, extort, injure, threaten, harass, intimidate or otherwise jeopardize the rights of the life of the Owner of this property.
Violators will be fined according to the amount allowed by law.
Broken Oath, Broken Law
|THE MICHIGAN PENAL CODE (EXCERPT) Act 328 of 1931
750.478 Willful neglect of duty; public officer or person holding public trust or employment; penalty.
When any duty is or shall be enjoined by law upon any public officer, or upon any person holding any public trust or employment, every willful neglect to perform such duty, where no special provision shall have been made for the punishment of such delinquency, constitutes a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment for not more than 1 year or a fine of not more than $1,000.00.
History: 1931, Act 328, Eff. Sept. 18, 1931 ;– CL 1948, 750.478 ;– Am. 2002, Act 672, Eff. Mar. 31, 2003
What if order is unconstitutional?
|THE MICHIGAN PENAL CODE (EXCERPT) Act 328 of 1931
750.481 Neglecting or refusing to execute process; penalty.
Neglecting or refusing to execute process—Whenever any constable, marshal, deputy or assistant marshal, coroner, sheriff or deputy sheriff of any township, city, village or county, shall at any time wilfully neglect or refuse to execute any lawful process of any court, or judicial officer having authority to issue the same, and which shall be duly issued, or whenever such officer shall, at any time, wilfully neglect or refuse to discharge or execute any special duty imposed on any such officer by any provision of law, such officer shall be guilty of a misdemeanor: Provided, That in all cases where such process shall be taken out
in the name of a party, other than the people of this state, it shall appear on the trial for such offense that the legal fees for serving such process have been tendered or paid to such officer.
History: 1931, Act 328, Eff. Sept. 18, 1931 ;– CL 1948, 750.481
Former Law: See section 1 of Act 9 of 1861, being CL 1871, § 7680; How., § 9262; CL 1897, § 11332; CL 1915, § 14999; and CL 1929, § 16594.
© 2009 Legislative Council, State of Michigan